Campus Activewear Limited (CAMPUS.NS) Bundle
Who is quietly shaping the share register of Campus Activewear Limited and why should investors care? With promoter holdings hovering around 72% (notably recorded at 72.12% in September 2025) and Foreign Institutional Investors boosting their stake from 5.35% in March to 6.61% by June 2025, the ownership mix tells a story of sustained promoter conviction alongside rising global interest; mutual funds collectively held 10.88% in June 2025 (18 schemes), DIIs have consistently stayed near 11% over the past year, and the number of FII investors expanded from 83 to 89 between March and June 2025-signals that institutional appetites and diversification are shifting. Major names add color to the ledger: ICICI Prudential boosted its stake by 2% in Q2 2023, GIC trimmed its exposure from 8% to 6.5% the same quarter, Reliance Nippon Life sits at about 7.2%, Xiaomi (India) holds ~5.89%, and Franklin Templeton about 3.21%-each move reflecting strategic views on growth, risk and retail trends; dive into the full analysis to understand who's buying, who's trimming, and what these shifts mean for Campus.NS investors
Campus Activewear Limited (CAMPUS.NS) - Who Invests in Campus Activewear Limited (CAMPUS.NS) and Why?
Campus Activewear Limited exhibits a concentrated promoter base alongside growing institutional interest. The following breakdown highlights who holds the stock, recent movements (Mar 2025 → Jun 2025), and the likely motives behind those positions.
- Promoters: Stable at ~72% (Mar 2025 → Jun 2025), signaling sustained insider confidence in long-term growth and capital allocation strategy.
- Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs): Increased from 5.35% to 6.61% - also saw investor count rise from 83 to 89, reflecting rising international recognition and portfolio diversification into branded apparel exposure.
- Mutual Funds: Slight rise from 10.26% to 10.52%, indicating cautious accumulation driven by steady revenue growth, margin expansion potential, and consumption-led demand.
- Domestic Institutional Investors (DIIs): Around ~11% consistently over the past year, implying steady domestic institutional conviction in the retail and distribution model.
- Retail & Other Investors: Relatively unchanged holdings, showing a stable retail base and low short-term churn among small investors.
| Investor Category | Mar 2025 (%) | Jun 2025 (%) | Investor Count (FII) | Primary Investment Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoters | ~72.00 | ~72.00 | - | Long-term control, strategic growth, confidence in margins |
| FIIs | 5.35 | 6.61 | 83 → 89 | International diversification, branded apparel exposure, secular demand |
| Mutual Funds | 10.26 | 10.52 | - | ISE (institutional steady accumulation), earnings growth prospects |
| DIIs | ~11.00 | ~11.00 | - | Domestic allocation to consumer discretionary & retail recovery |
| Retail & Others | Remainder | Remainder | - | Stable retail conviction, brand affinity |
- Why FIIs are adding: increasing global appetite for Indian branded consumer names, improving distribution metrics, and relative undervaluation vs. growth potential.
- Why Mutual Funds/DII maintain positions: predictable cash flows, improving operating leverage, and portfolio diversification within consumer discretionary.
- Why Promoters remain high: desire to retain strategic control while executing expansion and brand-building strategies.
For detailed financial metrics and deeper health analysis tied to these investor movements, see: Breaking Down Campus Activewear Limited Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors
Campus Activewear Limited (CAMPUS.NS) - Institutional Ownership and Major Shareholders of Campus Activewear Limited (CAMPUS.NS)
Campus Activewear Limited has seen measurable shifts in institutional participation through 2024-2025, with growing foreign interest, steady domestic institutional confidence and a slight promoter dilution to accommodate new investors. For background on the company's structure and evolution, see: Campus Activewear Limited: History, Ownership, Mission, How It Works & Makes Money- Mutual funds: 10.88% of equity as of June 2025, invested via 18 schemes (unchanged at 18 schemes through Sept 2025).
- Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs): 6.66% in June 2025, up from 5.35% in March 2025; number of FII investors rose from 83 to 89 between March and June 2025.
- Domestic Institutional Investors (DIIs): maintained ~11% stake over the past year, indicating steady domestic institutional confidence.
- Promoters: stake decreased from 73.84% in Dec 2024 to 72.12% in Sept 2025, reflecting modest dilution.
| Holder Category | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoters | 73.84% | 73.00% | 72.50% | 72.12% |
| Mutual Funds (No. of schemes) | 10.50% (est.) | 10.60% (est.) | 10.88% (18 schemes) | 10.88% (18 schemes) |
| FIIs (No. of investors) | 5.00% (83) | 5.35% (83) | 6.66% (89) | 6.80% (89) |
| DIIs | ~11.0% | ~11.0% | ~11.0% | ~11.0% |
| Public / Others | ~(-) | ~(-) | ~(-) | ~(-) |
- FII investor count rising (83 → 89) between Mar-Jun 2025 indicates broader international appeal beyond mere percentage change.
- Stable mutual fund scheme count (18 between Jun-Sep 2025) suggests institutional allocation is maintained rather than actively rotated away.
- Promoter dilution of ~1.72 percentage points from Dec 2024 → Sep 2025 likely facilitated increased institutional participation without major control change.
Campus Activewear Limited (CAMPUS.NS) - Key Investors and Their Impact on Campus Activewear Limited
Institutional and strategic holdings in Campus Activewear Limited (CAMPUS.NS) reveal who is backing the company's growth story and why. The following investor positions (noted below) from Q2 2023 highlight shifts in conviction, portfolio rebalancing and strategic interest that influence liquidity, governance and market perception.
| Investor | Reported Stake (Q2 2023) | Change (Q2 2023) | Nature of Investor | Immediate Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund | - increased by 2% (relative holding rise in Q2 2023) | +2 percentage points | Domestic institutional mutual fund | Signaled growing confidence; increased buying pressure and funds inflow |
| Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC) | Reduced from 8% to 6.5% | -1.5 percentage points | Sovereign wealth fund | Portfolio rebalancing; reduced strategic stake but remains a sizable investor |
| HDFC Asset Management | Consistent long-term holding (no major change reported) | Stable | Domestic asset manager / mutual fund | Provides steady institutional support and signals conviction in sector growth |
| Reliance Nippon Life Asset Management | ~7.2% | Stable / maintained | Domestic asset manager | Brings retail-insights-driven allocation and sustained buying capacity |
| Franklin Templeton Investment Funds | ~3.21% | Stable | Global asset manager | International vote of confidence; supports valuation stability |
| Xiaomi (India) Private Limited | ~5.89% | Stable / strategic investor | Strategic corporate investor | Indicates cross-industry strategic interest and potential partnership optics |
- Liquidity and float: Institutional accumulations (ICICI Pru, Reliance Nippon, HDFC) increase free-float trading volumes and can lower intraday volatility when concentrated buys occur.
- Valuation signaling: International and sovereign investors (GIC, Franklin Templeton) anchoring positions lend credibility to forward growth expectations.
- Strategic alignment: Xiaomi's ~5.89% stake suggests non-traditional strategic interest, potentially opening distribution, co-marketing or tech-enabled retail initiatives.
- Governance and stewardship: Large asset managers maintaining or increasing holdings typically engage on ESG, board composition and reporting - factors that can improve institutional sentiment and access to capital.
- Portfolio rebalancing effects: GIC's reduction from 8% to 6.5% in Q2 2023 reflects macro-driven reallocation; such moves can cause short-term share-pressure but do not necessarily reflect company fundamentals.
Key quantitative snapshot (Q2 2023 investor moves):
| Metric | Value / Note |
|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund change | Increased holding by 2 percentage points |
| GIC stake change | Reduced from 8% to 6.5% (-1.5 pts) |
| Reliance Nippon Life Asset Management stake | ~7.2% |
| Franklin Templeton stake | ~3.21% |
| Xiaomi (India) Private Limited stake | ~5.89% |
| HDFC Asset Management | Maintained position (long-term) |
Investor actions also interact with operational and market metrics: institutional buying supports share-price momentum around earnings releases, while strategic stakes can catalyze partnerships and distribution scale. For Campus Activewear's stated mission and strategic priorities, see: Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values (2026) of Campus Activewear Limited.
Campus Activewear Limited (CAMPUS.NS) - Market Impact and Investor Sentiment
Recent ownership movements in Campus Activewear Limited (CAMPUS.NS) highlight shifting sentiment among global and domestic investors, while promoter confidence remains a stabilizing force.
- Foreign Institutional Investors (FII) holdings rose from 5.35% in March 2025 to 6.61% in June 2025, signaling increasing international confidence in the company's growth prospects.
- Promoter holdings have remained steady at around 72%, underscoring strong internal confidence and governance continuity.
- Mutual fund holdings edged down slightly from 10.88% in June 2025 to 10.52% in September 2025, suggesting cautious repositioning by institutional domestic investors amid market volatility.
- Domestic Institutional Investors (DII) holdings have hovered at approximately 11% over the past year, indicating steady domestic institutional conviction.
| Metric | March 2025 | June 2025 | September 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| FII holdings (%) | 5.35 | 6.61 | 6.61 |
| Number of FII investors | 83 | 89 | 89 |
| Mutual fund holdings (%) | - | 10.88 | 10.52 |
| Number of mutual fund schemes invested | - | 18 | 18 |
| Promoter holdings (%) | ~72 | ~72 | ~72 |
| DII holdings (approx.) | ~11 | ~11 | ~11 |
- The increase in FII holdings and the rise in the count of FII investors (83 → 89 from Mar→Jun 2025) point to broader international appeal, which can support liquidity and valuation multiples.
- Stable promoter ownership (~72%) limits free float volatility and signals management alignment with shareholder interests, often attracting long-term investors.
- The slight contraction in mutual fund weights (10.88% → 10.52% Jun→Sep 2025) paired with an unchanged number of schemes (18) suggests selective trimming by funds rather than wholesale exits.
- Consistent DII exposure (~11%) reinforces domestic institutional steadiness, which can moderate sharp intra-day price swings.
For context on the company's broader positioning, capital structure and history, see: Campus Activewear Limited: History, Ownership, Mission, How It Works & Makes Money
0 0 0
Campus Activewear Limited (CAMPUS.NS) DCF Excel Template
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.