Breaking Down RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors

Breaking Down RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors

IL | Healthcare | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | NASDAQ

RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL) Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$25 $15
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99

TOTAL:

You're looking at RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL) and seeing a classic biotech tightrope walk: commercial traction versus critical balance sheet pressure. Honestly, the first half of 2025 showed a real operational pivot, with net revenues jumping to $4.1 million, a solid 59% increase over the same period last year, largely driven by their flagship product, Talicia. That's the good news-they're selling more. But here's the quick math on the risk: as of June 30, 2025, the company's cash balance stood at a lean $3 million, while total liabilities were around $22.8 million, which is a significant gap for a firm with a recent market capitalization of only $3.53 million. Plus, the Nasdaq recently flagged them for a minimum stockholders' equity deficiency, a hurdle they believe they cleared post-October with a transaction that pushed them past the $2.5 million minimum. The near-term opportunity is defintely tied to their pipeline-like the potential $60 million out-licensing deal for RHB-102-but you need to understand how quickly that $5 million in net cash used in operating activities for H1 2025 burns through their current liquidity.

Revenue Analysis

You're looking for a clear picture of RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL)'s current financial engine, and the most recent data for the first half of the 2025 fiscal year shows a significant shift: the company is successfully pivoting to a leaner, product-focused model. Net revenues for the first half of 2025 hit $4.1 million, marking a substantial 59% increase over the same period in 2024.

Honestly, that 59% jump is a strong signal of commercial focus, but it's crucial to understand what's driving it. The bulk of the revenue is now highly concentrated in one key product, with a new licensing deal providing a smaller, but important, non-dilutive stream. It's a risk, but it's defintely focused.

Primary Revenue Streams: Talicia and Licensing

RedHill Biopharma Ltd.'s revenue structure is now overwhelmingly dependent on Talicia, their drug for treating H. pylori infection. This is the core commercial asset, and its performance is the primary metric to watch. In the first half of 2025, Talicia generated $3.8 million in net revenues, meaning it accounted for roughly 92.7% of the total net revenue.

Here's the quick math on where that money came from:

  • U.S. Product Sales: $3.3 million (This is the domestic workhorse, showing an increase in units sold compared to the prior year).
  • Ex-U.S. Sales and Royalties: Approximately $0.6 million (This includes $0.5 million in product sales from the United Arab Emirates partnership and $0.1 million in royalties).

The second, newer segment is non-dilutive revenue from out-licensing. This is smart business for a biotech. The global (ex-North America) licensing deal for RHB-102 (Bekinda) with Hyloris Pharmaceuticals contributed $0.3 million in the first half of 2025, which includes an upfront payment and the present value of future minimum annual payments. This is a segment that could grow as they explore additional licensing opportunities. You can review the company's long-term strategy in their Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL).

Year-over-Year Growth and Segment Contribution

The 59% year-over-year net revenue growth is impressive, but it's not just about increased sales of Talicia; it's also about cleaning up the balance sheet from past divestitures. Specifically, the divestiture of Movantik significantly reduced contra-revenues (money set aside for product returns or other deductions). In the first half of 2024, Movantik actually generated negative net revenues of $0.9 million due to returns. That drag was essentially eliminated in the first half of 2025, which dramatically improved the net revenue figure.

What this estimate hides is that while the gross sales of Talicia are up, the huge percentage increase in net revenue is partially a one-time benefit from scrubbing the Movantik liability. Still, the underlying commercial engine is moving in the right direction, as evidenced by the increase in Talicia units sold in the U.S.

For a clear look at the composition of the revenue, here is the breakdown for the six months ended June 30, 2025:

Revenue Segment H1 2025 Net Revenue (in millions) Contribution to Total Revenue
Talicia Product Sales (U.S. & Ex-U.S.) $3.8 million ~92.7%
RHB-102 Licensing & Other $0.3 million ~7.3%
Total Net Revenues $4.1 million 100%

The clear action here is to monitor Talicia's U.S. prescription volume and watch for any announcements on new ex-U.S. licensing deals, as those are the two primary growth levers right now.

Profitability Metrics

You're looking at RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL) to see if their operational improvements are finally translating into profit, and the simple answer is: the gross margin is strong, but the company is still deep in the red. The good news is that their cost-cutting is showing up in the operating loss, which was nearly halved in the first half of 2025.

For the six months ended June 30, 2025 (1H 2025), RedHill Biopharma Ltd. reported Net Revenues of $4.1 million and a Gross Profit of $2.5 million. This translates to a Gross Profit Margin of approximately 60.98%. That's a solid margin for a specialty biopharma company, sitting comfortably within the typical industry range of 60% to 80% for pharmaceutical products. It's a clear win on product pricing and manufacturing costs.

Here's the quick math on their core profitability for the first half of the year:

  • Gross Profit Margin: 60.98%
  • Operating Profit Margin: -107.32%
  • Net Profit Margin: -100.00%

The operational efficiency story is defintely a mixed bag when you look past the gross profit. While the Gross Profit Margin is healthy, the Operating Loss for 1H 2025 was $4.4 million, resulting in a deeply negative Operating Profit Margin of -107.32%. This is far from the industry average, which is typically around 20% to 40% for pharmaceutical companies, indicating that Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) and Research & Development (R&D) expenses are still overwhelming their revenue base.

The trend in profitability shows a company executing a major cost overhaul. The Operating Loss dropped significantly from $8.4 million in the first half of 2024 to $4.4 million in 1H 2025. This 47.6% improvement is a direct result of continued cost-cutting measures. Plus, Gross Profit doubled year-over-year, driven by a 59% increase in net revenues and managing to keep the Cost of Revenues low at just $1.6 million for the period, partly due to royalty income that has no associated Cost of Goods Sold (COGS). This is a great sign of operational leverage starting to kick in.

Still, the bottom line tells a different story. The Net Loss actually widened to $4.1 million in 1H 2025, up from a $3.1 million net loss in 1H 2024. This increase was primarily driven by a significant decrease in financial income, which was related to the revaluation of warrants in the prior year. So, while operations improved, a one-time financial item made the net result worse. The TTM (Trailing Twelve Months) Net Profit Margin sits at a similarly challenging -97.52%. This is why you need to look at operating profit (EBIT) and net profit separately; they tell different stories about the core business versus financing activities.

The key takeaway is that RedHill Biopharma Ltd. has made substantial progress in operational efficiency and gross margin expansion, but reaching true net profitability-the 10% to 30% industry average-will require a massive increase in commercial sales of their key products like Talicia to cover the high fixed R&D and SG&A costs. For a more complete picture of the company's financial standing, you should check out the full analysis: Breaking Down RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.

Debt vs. Equity Structure

You're looking at RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL) to understand how they fund their operations, and the quick takeaway is this: the company is relying almost entirely on equity-linked financing, not traditional debt. This is a common, but risky, structure for a development-stage biopharma company, especially one with negative shareholder equity.

As of the first half of 2025, RedHill Biopharma Ltd.'s balance sheet shows a minimal amount of total debt, reported at just $0.21 million USD. That's incredibly low for a publicly traded company. However, the total liabilities stood at $22.8 million as of June 30, 2025, which means most of their obligations are short-term payables, accrued expenses, and derivative liabilities, not long-term bank loans or bonds. The real issue here isn't the debt; it's the equity.

Here's the quick math: with total assets of $18.4 million and total liabilities of $22.8 million as of mid-2025, RedHill Biopharma Ltd. has a negative shareholder equity of approximately $-4.4 million. A negative equity position means the company's liabilities exceed its assets, which is a serious financial stress signal. Because of this, the Debt-to-Equity (D/E) ratio is technically a negative value, which is not a useful metric for comparison. You have almost no debt, but you also have no shareholder cushion.

The industry comparison is stark. The average D/E ratio for the U.S. Biotechnology industry as of November 2025 is around 0.17. RedHill Biopharma Ltd. is far below this benchmark in terms of debt, but the negative equity makes its financial position fundamentally weaker than a peer with a modest, positive D/E ratio. The lack of debt is a feature, not a bug, given the company's financial fragility.

So, how is RedHill Biopharma Ltd. financing its work? They are funding growth and operations almost exclusively through equity. In the first half of 2025, the company reported $3.3 million in Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities. This cash inflow was driven by the use of an At-the-Market (ATM) program, which allows them to sell new shares into the market over time. They also have access to up to approximately $13.5 million through ATM and Any Market Purchase agreements. This strategy is a constant trade-off:

  • Debt Financing: Low usage; avoids interest payments and covenants, but limits access to large, one-time capital injections.
  • Equity Funding: High usage; provides immediate capital but results in significant shareholder dilution.

The constant issuance of new shares to raise capital is defintely the main risk for current investors. You can read more about the investor base and dilution risk in Exploring RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL) Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why?. The company is essentially trading future ownership for today's cash burn.

Your next step should be to look at the cash runway. Finance: calculate how many quarters the $3 million cash balance (as of June 30, 2025) will last, given the $5 million net cash used in operations during the first half of 2025.

Liquidity and Solvency

You need to know if RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL) can cover its near-term bills, and the simple answer is: not comfortably. The company's liquidity position remains tight, requiring continued reliance on financing activities to bridge the gap created by negative operating cash flow.

As a seasoned analyst, I look straight at the Current Ratio (Current Assets / Current Liabilities) and Quick Ratio (Acid-Test Ratio), which tell the real story of short-term financial health. RedHill Biopharma Ltd.'s current ratio sits at a concerning 0.56, and its quick ratio is even lower at 0.37. A ratio below 1.0 means the company's current assets-cash, receivables, and inventory-cannot cover its current liabilities. Honestly, in the biotech space, a ratio this low is a flashing red light for immediate liquidity risk, even with the potential for future milestone payments.

Here's the quick math on their working capital (Current Assets minus Current Liabilities): it's negative. The most recent reporting indicates a working capital deficit of approximately -$10.31 million. This negative figure means current liabilities are towering over current assets, limiting maneuverability and signaling a dependence on external funding or asset sales to meet obligations coming due within the next year. The company is defintely striving to manage this, but a deficit this large is a structural problem, not a temporary blip.

The cash flow statement overview for the first half of 2025 (H1 2025) maps out the flow of money and shows where the pressure is coming from. While the company has made strides in cost-cutting, cash is still flowing out of core operations.

  • Operating Cash Flow: RedHill Biopharma Ltd. used $5 million in cash for operating activities in H1 2025. This is an improvement from the prior year, but it's still a net cash burn.
  • Investing Cash Flow: This is minimal, with a net cash use of only $0.01 million (Trailing Twelve Months ending June 2025). This suggests very little capital expenditure, which is typical for a streamlined biopharma focused on R&D and commercialization.
  • Financing Cash Flow: In H1 2025, the company brought in $3.3 million from financing activities. This cash infusion, primarily from equity offerings like the At-the-Market (ATM) program, is what's keeping the lights on.

The clear action for you, the investor, is to recognize that RedHill Biopharma Ltd. is in a precarious financial position where its operational success is directly tied to its ability to raise capital. The main strength is the significant reduction in cash burn, which dropped by a further 19% in H1 2025, but the core liquidity metrics are weak. What this estimate hides is the potential for non-dilutive funding, like the up to $60 million global out-licensing deal for RHB-102. Still, the current financial structure points to a material going concern risk due to insufficient funding to cover overdue obligations. You need to weigh the clinical pipeline's potential against this immediate financial risk. For a deeper dive into the market dynamics, consider Exploring RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL) Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why?

Valuation Analysis

You're looking at RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL) and wondering if the current price reflects its true potential, especially with the volatility in the biotech space. The direct takeaway is that RedHill Biopharma Ltd. appears significantly undervalued based on its Enterprise Value (EV) relative to its sales, but this low valuation is a clear reflection of its severe financial instability and high-risk profile, not a hidden bargain.

As of late 2025, the company's valuation metrics are largely distorted by its financial structure. Here's the quick math on why traditional metrics are unhelpful: RedHill Biopharma Ltd. has a negative shareholder equity of approximately -$4.4 million, which is a major red flag. This negative equity makes the Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio negative, sitting around -3.27, so you can't use it for a simple comparison.

The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio is also effectively 0.00 or 'N/A' because the company is not profitable, reporting a trailing twelve-month (TTM) Earnings Per Share (EPS) of around -$2.32. This isn't unusual for a biopharma company focused on research and development (R&D), but it means you must focus on cash flow and pipeline progress instead of net income. The Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) ratio is also negative, around -0.09, for the same reason-negative earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). The market capitalization is small, at about $3.60 million, but the Enterprise Value is even lower, at just $765,099. This suggests the market is assigning almost no value to the equity after accounting for liabilities and cash.

  • P/E Ratio: N/A (Due to negative earnings)
  • P/B Ratio: -3.27 (Due to negative equity)
  • EV/EBITDA: -0.09 (Due to negative EBITDA)

What this estimate hides is the true risk: the company is facing a minimum stockholders' equity deficiency notification from Nasdaq. You need to look past the ratios and focus on their cash runway. For a deeper dive into the company's long-term strategy, you can check out the Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL).

Stock Price and Analyst Sentiment

The stock price trend over the last 12 months is defintely concerning. The price has plummeted by over -85.46% in the 52 weeks leading up to November 2025, with a 52-week range of $1.01 to $8.75. The stock is trading near its 52-week low of $1.01. This steep decline reflects the market's reaction to ongoing financial challenges and dilution from recent equity raises to fund operations.

When we look at shareholder returns, RedHill Biopharma Ltd. does not currently pay a dividend. The dividend yield is 0.00% and the payout ratio is 0.00%, which is standard for a growth-focused biopharma firm that needs to reinvest every dollar into R&D and commercialization efforts.

Analyst consensus is cautious. While many firms do not have a formal 12-month price target, the limited coverage that exists points to a 'Sell' consensus rating. One analysis model even suggests an 'Underperform' rating with a target of $1.00, indicating a slight downside from the current price. This sentiment is driven by the company's persistent negative cash flow from operations, which was -$5 million in the first half of 2025, and the overall financial instability.

Your action item is clear: treat RedHill Biopharma Ltd. as a speculative investment tied to its drug pipeline success (like Talicia's performance, which saw net revenues of $3.8 million in the first half of 2025) and its ability to manage its cash runway, not as a value play based on traditional valuation metrics.

Risk Factors

You've seen the positive headlines-net revenues up 59% in the first half of 2025 to $4.1 million, and a doubled gross profit-but as a seasoned investor, you know that a specialty biopharma company like RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL) always carries significant risk. The core challenge is simple: the company is still losing money and needs capital to fund its pipeline. It's a classic biotech balancing act.

The most immediate, near-term risk is financial stability and liquidity, which feeds directly into a material going concern risk. Honestly, despite the operational progress, the company's current working capital is not enough to commercialize its existing products or complete the research and development (R&D) for all its therapeutic candidates. As of June 30, 2025, the cash balance was only $3 million, while total liabilities stood at $22.8 million, a clear imbalance. That's a tight spot.

Operational and Financial Headwinds

The recent financial reports highlight a few key operational and financial risks you need to track. First, while the operating loss dropped significantly to $4.4 million in the first half of 2025, the net loss still increased to $4.1 million, primarily due to a decrease in financial income from warrant revaluations. That shows that external, non-core finance activities can still swing the bottom line. Plus, the most significant risk, according to some analysts, remains negative margins and cash flow problems. It's a simple equation: you need more cash coming in than going out, and the burn rate, while reduced, is still a factor.

Here's a quick snapshot of the core operational risks:

  • Regulatory Hurdles: Every pipeline candidate, including the promising Crohn's disease program, requires successful additional clinical trials and regulatory approvals (like from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA) before it can generate commercial sales.
  • Market Competition: The gastrointestinal and infectious disease markets are highly competitive. RedHill Biopharma Ltd.'s commercial product, Talicia (for H. pylori infection), must continually fight for market share against established and new treatments.
  • R&D Expense Creep: Research and Development expenses for the first half of 2025 actually increased to $1 million (up from $0.7 million in H1 2024), driven by costs for clinical activities and regulatory work for Talicia. This is necessary, but it pressures the already tight cash position.

Strategic and External Risks: The Nasdaq Hurdle

The most public risk in late 2025 was the Nasdaq listing compliance issue. RedHill Biopharma Ltd. received a Staff Determination letter on October 16, 2025, for failing to meet the minimum stockholders' equity requirement of $2.5 million. This is a serious threat-a delisting could severely limit the stock's liquidity and investor interest. However, to be fair, the company acted fast.

The mitigation strategies are clear and action-oriented. They are fighting the fire on multiple fronts:

Risk Area Mitigation Strategy (2025 Actions) Financial Impact/Value
Nasdaq Non-Compliance Appealing the Staff Determination; Strategic transaction with Cumberland Pharmaceuticals. Stockholders' equity now believed to exceed $2.5 million minimum.
Liquidity/Capital Shortfall Secured At-the-Market (ATM) and Any Market Purchase agreements. Up to approximately $13.5 million in available liquidity.
Commercialization/Funding Co-commercialization partnership with Cumberland Pharmaceuticals for Talicia. $4 million investment from Cumberland.
Legal/Asset Recovery Final New York Supreme Court judgment win against Kukbo Co. Ltd. Over $10.5 million judgment win, bolstering financial stability.

The recent partnership with Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, including a $4 million investment, is a defintely smart move. It not only helps with the Nasdaq issue but also provides a U.S. co-commercialization partner for Talicia, which should help drive sales growth beyond the $3.8 million in net revenues it generated in the first half of 2025. This is a company making strategic, high-stakes moves to survive and grow. For a deeper dive into who is betting on these moves, you can check out Exploring RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL) Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why?

Growth Opportunities

You're looking at RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL) and trying to figure out if the recent strategic moves translate into sustainable growth. The direct takeaway is this: RedHill has successfully shifted from a high-burn R&D model to a commercial-focused one, leveraging key partnerships and pipeline advancements to stabilize its financial footing in 2025, but the revenue base is still small.

Here's the quick math on their core product, Talicia (omeprazole magnesium, amoxicillin, and rifabutin), which treats H. pylori infection. In the first half of 2025 (H1 2025), Talicia generated U.S. net revenues of $3.3 million. That's a strong anchor, but the real upside comes from the strategic co-commercialization deal signed in October 2025 with Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CPIX).

This partnership is a game-changer for market expansion. Cumberland invested $4 million for a 30% stake in the global Talicia business, and they will share U.S. net revenues equally while Cumberland provides national sales and marketing support. This move immediately bolstered RedHill's balance sheet, helping them regain compliance with the Nasdaq minimum stockholders' equity requirement, which they believe is now in excess of the $2.5 million threshold. That's a critical stability factor.

The competitive advantage for Talicia is its intellectual property protection, extending through 2042, plus eight years of U.S. Qualified Infectious Disease Product (QIDP) exclusivity. This long runway gives the Cumberland partnership time to execute on their joint U.S. commercial strategy.

Beyond the flagship product, the pipeline offers the next big potential growth drivers:

  • RHB-204 (Crohn's Disease): Received positive U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) feedback for a next-generation program. This is a precision medicine approach, planning the first-ever clinical study in a defined Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP-positive) Crohn's disease patient population. This is a novel, high-value strategy.
  • Opaganib (Advanced Prostate Cancer): A Phase 2 combination study with darolutamide is underway, supported by Bayer AG. This is a non-dilutive, externally funded R&D program, which is defintely the smart way to manage clinical risk.
  • RHB-102 (Gastrointestinal): Secured an out-licensing deal with Hyloris Pharmaceuticals SA for up to $60 million globally (excluding North America). This provides a significant, non-dilutive cash inflow.

The financial picture for the full 2025 fiscal year is still developing, but the trends are clear. RedHill reported a 59% increase in net revenues for H1 2025, totaling $4.1 million, up from $2.6 million in H1 2024. Their gross profit also doubled year-over-year in the first half of 2025. While the company still posted a Net Loss of $4.1 million in H1 2025, the operating loss was significantly reduced. Some forecasts project a high revenue growth of 372.5% for the full 2025 fiscal year, which, if achieved, would put total revenue around $38.04 million (based on 2024's $8.04 million), but this is an aggressive projection that hinges on a massive Q4 sales push and licensing revenue recognition.

What this estimate hides is the high-risk nature of biopharma revenue. The key is execution on the Talicia co-commercialization and advancing the RHB-204 program. They also have a legal tailwind, securing a judgment against Kukbo Co. Ltd. for approximately $10.5 million in September 2025, which further fortifies their cash position.

For a deeper dive into the balance sheet and valuation, you can check out the full post on Breaking Down RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors. Your next concrete step should be to track the Q4 2025 Talicia sales figures and any new updates on the RHB-204 Phase 2 trial initiation.

DCF model

RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (RDHL) DCF Excel Template

    5-Year Financial Model

    40+ Charts & Metrics

    DCF & Multiple Valuation

    Free Email Support


Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.