First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. (FSEA) Bundle
You're looking beyond the surface of First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. (FSEA), and that's smart-because the investor profile tells a compelling, defintely mixed story right now. While the company posted a net loss of $(0.758) million for the first nine months of 2025, they did manage a sharp turnaround in the third quarter with a net income of $0.39 million, which is a critical data point for anyone assessing a community bank in this rate environment. So, who's buying into this volatility? The ownership structure is unusual: retail investors hold a dominant 68.20%, but a quarter of the float, 24.96%, is held by institutions, led by AllianceBernstein L.P. with 9.25% of shares as of mid-2025. Plus, insiders have been net buyers over the last year, which is a strong signal. Are these large institutional players betting on a strategic event, or are they simply seeing deep value in the $63.16 million of stockholders' equity? We'll map out the exact motivations, the near-term risks, and the clear actions you should consider.
Who Invests in First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. (FSEA) and Why?
The investor base for First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. (FSEA) is a fascinating mix, primarily driven by institutional money looking for a deep-value or turnaround play, plus a loyal contingent of local retail investors. You aren't buying FSEA for a dividend-it pays a 0% yield [cite: 3 in step 1]-you are buying it for a potential revaluation or a strategic event.
As of November 2025, the company has a micro-cap valuation of about $55.71 million, which means even small shifts in investor sentiment can move the stock price significantly. The core motivation for most buyers is the belief that the bank's book value is significantly undervalued by the market, or that its recent efforts to improve profitability will pay off.
Key Investor Types: The Ownership Breakdown
When you look at FSEA's ownership structure, it's clear that institutional investors-the big money managers-hold a substantial stake. This is a common setup for smaller banks that have gone through a mutual-to-stock conversion, where a significant portion of shares are initially held by local depositors (retail) but are gradually acquired by institutions.
Institutional investors own approximately 38.38% of the outstanding shares [cite: 5 in step 1]. That's a high concentration for a company this size, and it tells you the smart money sees a specific opportunity. The key players include:
- Mutual Funds & Investment Managers: Firms like Alliancebernstein L.P. and Vanguard Group Inc. hold large positions, with Alliancebernstein L.P. owning about 9.78% and Vanguard Group Inc. holding approximately 4.41% [cite: 7 in step 1]. They often hold FSEA in their small-cap or value-focused funds.
- Hedge Funds: The presence of firms like Renaissance Technologies LLC, which holds about 0.45% [cite: 7 in step 1], indicates a more speculative or quantitative interest. These are typically short-term, event-driven bets.
- Retail Investors: These are the individual investors, often local customers in the New Hampshire and southern Maine area, who are buying to support a community bank or because they received shares during the initial public offering (IPO). They are often long-term holders, driven by local loyalty and the bank's mission to have a local impact. You can read more about that commitment here: Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. (FSEA).
Honestly, the retail base provides a stable floor, but the institutional investors are the ones who will drive the stock's future movements.
Investment Motivations: Why They Are Buying
The reasons investors are buying FSEA are not tied to current profitability; the company reported a trailing twelve-month (TTM) loss of about -$2.51 million on $14.10 million in revenue [cite: 4 in step 1]. The motivation is entirely forward-looking and based on a value proposition.
Here's the quick math on the attraction:
| Motivation | Investor Type | Concrete Example (as of 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Value Proposition (Book Value) | Institutional, Hedge Funds | The stock trades at a discount to its tangible book value per share (TBVPS), suggesting the bank's assets are worth more than the current stock price. |
| Turnaround Potential | Hedge Funds, Value Funds | The recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) of $0.08 suggests a potential shift toward profitability, despite the negative TTM figures. |
| Acquisition Speculation | Hedge Funds, Short-Term Traders | Small, undervalued community banks are frequent merger and acquisition (M&A) targets in the financial sector, offering a quick exit at a premium. |
| Community Loyalty | Retail Investors | Supporting a New Hampshire-based regional institution with a focus on local decision-making. |
The stock's 52-week price change of +25.96% [cite: 4 in step 1] through November 2025 shows that the market is defintely starting to price in some of this turnaround or acquisition potential.
Investment Strategies: Playing the Turnaround
The dominant strategy among the larger investors in FSEA is a form of Value Investing (buying stocks that appear cheap relative to their intrinsic worth). This is not a growth stock, so investors are not chasing massive revenue acceleration.
- Long-Term Holding/Value Investing: Mutual funds and patient institutions are employing this strategy, betting that management will execute a successful turnaround, driving the Return on Equity (ROE), currently at a negative -4.01% [cite: 4 in step 1], back into positive territory. They are willing to wait three to five years for the stock price to converge with the bank's book value.
- Short-Term Trading/Event-Driven: Hedge funds are likely positioning for a near-term catalyst. This could be a significant improvement in earnings, a strategic balance sheet move, or, most commonly for micro-cap banks, a merger announcement. The low trading volume (average daily volume is small) means a large buyer can quickly move the price.
The risk here is that the turnaround takes longer than expected, or the M&A event never materializes. If the bank cannot sustain positive earnings, the value play becomes a 'value trap.' The recent insider selling by a director, who reduced their personal holdings by 40.1% in November 2025 [cite: 8 in step 1], is a data point that suggests not everyone is universally bullish on the near-term outlook.
Institutional Ownership and Major Shareholders of First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. (FSEA)
You're looking at First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. (FSEA) and trying to figure out who the big money is, and honestly, the ownership structure is more complex than a typical publicly traded company. The direct takeaway is that while institutional investors hold a significant portion of the publicly traded shares, the company's Mutual Holding Company (MHC) structure is the dominant strategic factor. Institutional investors own approximately 38.38% of the total stock, but the MHC still holds a majority stake, which limits the influence of even the largest fund managers.
Top Institutional Investors and Their Holdings
As of the most recent filings in the third quarter of 2025, the top institutional holders in First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. are a mix of large, passive index funds and more active capital managers. This breakdown is crucial because it tells you who has the most skin in the game-and who is likely a passive holder versus a potential activist. AllianceBernstein L.P. is the clear leader, holding a position valued over $5 million.
Here's the quick math on the top three holders based on September 29, 2025, data:
| Institutional Investor | Shares Held (Q3 2025) | Value (In Millions, Q3 2025) | Approximate % of Total Shares |
|---|---|---|---|
| AllianceBernstein L.P. | 458,908 | $5.484 million | 9.25% |
| The Vanguard Group, Inc. | 207,379 | $2.478 million | 4.18% |
| Polaris Capital Management, LLC | 90,537 | $1.082 million | 1.83% |
The presence of The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Geode Capital Management, LLC (another top holder) is typical for a small-cap stock because they manage large index funds (like Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) that mechanically buy shares to track the market. AllianceBernstein, though, is a different animal; their larger, non-index-driven position suggests a more deliberate investment thesis in the bank.
Recent Shifts and Ownership Changes
Looking at the near-term activity, institutional investors have been net buyers over the last two years, purchasing a total of 46,446 shares while selling 6,696 shares. This overall net buying suggests a relatively stable, slightly positive sentiment from the institutional cohort, but it's not a stampede.
Still, you need to watch for specific signals. For example, a director of First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. recently sold 3,450 shares for a total value of approximately $39,099.19 on November 18, 2025. This sale represented a substantial 40.1% reduction in that insider's personal holdings. To be fair, this is a small amount relative to the company's overall market capitalization of around $55 million, but a major reduction in a personal stake is defintely a point of interest for any investor.
- Vanguard Group Inc. was a major buyer, showing index-driven demand.
- Insider sales signal a personal portfolio adjustment.
- Net institutional buying suggests modest, long-term confidence.
The Role and Impact of Large Institutional Investors
The primary role of these large investors in First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. is twofold: price stability and limited strategic oversight. Their trading volume, even from passive funds, provides liquidity and can create buying or selling pressure that influences short-term price movements. When Vanguard or AllianceBernstein buy or sell, the market notices, even if they aren't trying to send a message.
However, their strategic influence is significantly curtailed by the bank's structure. First Seacoast Bancorp, MHC, the federal mutual holding company, owns a majority of the common stock. This means that even if all institutional investors banded together, they could not outvote the MHC on major strategic decisions like a full conversion, a merger, or key corporate governance issues. This structure is designed to keep control local and focused on the community bank mission. You can read more about the core focus here: Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. (FSEA).
Here's what this MHC structure means for you as an investor:
- The MHC acts as a permanent, controlling shareholder.
- Institutional investors primarily influence the public float.
- Their main leverage is through engagement on capital allocation, not control.
What this estimate hides is the potential for a full mutual-to-stock conversion, which would unlock the MHC's shares and dramatically increase the institutional investors' power and the public float. Until then, institutional holders are mostly passive capital providers who want to see consistent performance and a clear path to maximizing shareholder value within the current structure.
Next step: Check the latest SEC filings for any proxy proposals where AllianceBernstein or Polaris Capital Management, LLC have voted against management, as this is where their limited influence is most visible.
Key Investors and Their Impact on First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. (FSEA)
You want to know who is really pulling the strings at First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. (FSEA) and why they are buying or selling shares. The quick answer is that institutional money, not activist hedge funds, holds the most sway, representing a significant chunk of the company's valuation, which was approximately $60 million as of late 2025.
As a community bank, First Seacoast Bancorp's investor base is a mix of local retail holders and larger institutional players. Institutional investors collectively own a substantial 38.38% of the outstanding common stock, meaning their collective buying and selling decisions defintely move the price.
The core of the institutional ownership is dominated by a few major investment management firms, who are likely drawn to the stock for its regional focus and potential for long-term stability, even with the year-to-date net loss of $758 thousand reported for the nine months ended September 30, 2025.
The Big Players: Who Holds the Largest Stakes
The most notable investors are large, established asset managers-not the headline-grabbing activist funds you see at bigger banks. These firms typically hold FSEA as a small-cap value play or as part of a broader index-tracking strategy (passive investing). Their influence is primarily through their sheer holding size, which can affect liquidity and signal market confidence.
- Alliancebernstein L.P.: The largest institutional holder with a stake valued at approximately $5.29 million.
- Vanguard Group Inc.: A major passive investor with holdings valued at about $2.39 million.
- Polaris Capital Management LLC: Holds a notable position valued at around $1.03 million.
These institutions, plus others like Renaissance Technologies LLC, are long-term holders. They aren't typically looking for a quick flip; they're looking for predictable returns from a balance sheet that shows total assets of $609.6 million as of early November 2025.
Investor Influence: How Decisions Get Made
Because the largest holders are institutional managers rather than activist hedge funds, their influence is generally exerted behind the scenes through engagement with the board and management, not public proxy fights. They focus on governance, capital allocation, and long-term strategy, especially after the Q3 2025 net income of $390 thousand showed a return to quarterly profitability despite the year-to-date loss.
The real-time influence you can track is through insider moves. When directors and executives buy or sell, it offers a direct window into management's sentiment about the company's near-term prospects. This is especially true for a smaller bank where insider knowledge is highly relevant to the stock price. You can learn more about the bank's structure and mission here: First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. (FSEA): History, Ownership, Mission, How It Works & Makes Money.
Recent Notable Moves and What They Signal
The most recent and telling moves involve the insiders themselves. On November 18, 2025, a director, J. Thomas Jean, sold a total of 3,450 shares across several transactions, at an average price of $11.33 per share. Here's the quick math: the total value of the sale was approximately $39,099.19.
What this estimate hides is the context: this sale represented a significant 40.1% reduction in the director's personal direct stock holdings. While the dollar amount is tiny compared to the overall market cap-only about 0.065%-the substantial percentage reduction in a personal stake is a strong signal of a director taking chips off the table near the 52-week high of $11.95.
In contrast, another director, Dana C. Lynch, bought 500 shares in May 2024, showing a positive stance at the time, which provides a useful counterpoint. The table below summarizes the key recent insider activity in 2025:
| Insider | Date | Transaction | Shares Involved | Average Price | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Thomas Jean (Director) | Nov 18, 2025 | Sale | 3,450 | $11.33 | Significant personal stake reduction (40.1%) |
| J. Thomas Jean (Director) | Jun 17, 2025 | Sale | 1,700 | $11.0818 | Selling near the high end of the 52-week range |
The takeaway is simple: institutional investors provide a stable foundation, but you need to watch insider selling like the November 2025 move, especially when it represents a massive cut to an individual's holdings. That kind of action suggests an executive sees better risk/reward elsewhere, even if the company is managing its interest margins well, like the Q3 2025 net interest and dividend income of $3.45 million.
Market Impact and Investor Sentiment
The investor sentiment surrounding First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. (FSEA) is currently best described as cautious, leaning toward negative, despite a recent uptick in the stock price following a strong quarterly earnings report. The market is clearly wrestling with the company's mixed financial signals for the 2025 fiscal year. You have a situation where institutional money is parked, but Wall Street analysts are not yet convinced.
The consensus among the handful of Wall Street analysts who cover the stock is a definitive Sell rating. For example, Weiss Ratings recently reaffirmed a Sell (D-) rating on the shares. This negative outlook is largely driven by the company's profitability metrics, which show a negative return on equity of -4.02% and a negative net margin of -9.05% for the recent quarter, signaling the underlying business is unprofitable on a margin basis. Honestly, a negative P/E ratio of -20.80 tells you everything you need to know about current core profitability expectations.
- Consensus Analyst Rating: Sell
- Recent Quarterly EPS: $0.08
- Market Capitalization (Nov 2025): $55.71 million
Recent Market Reactions to Ownership Changes
The stock market's response to ownership changes at First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. has been muted, but the details are telling. A director's recent insider sale of 3,450 shares on November 18, 2025, for a total value of approximately $39,099.19, was a significant personal move-it reduced the insider's stake by 40.1%. However, the transaction was too small to materially affect the market, representing only about 0.065% of the company's total market capitalization of around $60 million, so the market reaction was neutral.
On the other hand, the stock did react positively to the third-quarter 2025 earnings report released in November 2025. Following the report of a diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $0.08, shares of FSEA traded up by $0.26, hitting $11.85. This suggests that while long-term sentiment is weak, the market will reward a quarterly return to profitability, which saw net income rise to $0.39 million compared to only $0.044 million a year ago. It's a classic case of a stock being driven by short-term news, not long-term fundamentals.
The Institutional Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why
A substantial portion of First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc.'s stock, specifically 38.38%, is held by institutional investors, which include major players. This high institutional ownership is a key factor, as these firms often have a longer-term view or are betting on a strategic event, such as a potential acquisition or a successful turnaround. The largest institutional holders are not just holding; they are making calculated moves.
For a deeper dive into the company's operational structure and history, you can read more here: First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. (FSEA): History, Ownership, Mission, How It Works & Makes Money. The institutional buying activity, even with a sell-side consensus, hints at a value play-they see the company's tangible book value or its regional deposit franchise as undervalued.
Here's a quick look at the top institutional positions as of November 2025, which helps you map who has skin in the game:
| Major Shareholder Name | Shares Held (Nov 2025) | Market Value (Nov 2025) | Ownership in Company |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliancebernstein L.P. | 459,988 | $5.29 million | 9.787% |
| Vanguard Group Inc. | 207,379 | $2.39 million | 4.412% |
| Polaris Capital Management LLC | 90,537 | $1.03 million | 1.918% |
| Geode Capital Management LLC | 325,000 (Approx.) | $325K (Approx.) | N/A |
Notice Alliancebernstein L.P. recently increased its position by +0.2%, but Vanguard Group Inc. trimmed its stake by -1.6% in the same period. This mixed activity shows a lack of defintely unified institutional conviction, but the sheer size of the largest positions means their sentiment is the one that ultimately matters most for the stock's stability.

First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. (FSEA) DCF Excel Template
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.