Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI) Bundle
You're looking at Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI) and trying to reconcile the high-stakes clinical progress with the grim financials, right? Honestly, the investor profile tells a clear story: this isn't a broad institutional conviction play, but a deeply concentrated insider bet on the Phase III Flamingo-01 trial. The Q3 2025 financial results showed $0 in revenue, pushing the year-to-date net loss to $11.4 million, and the cash position stood at a lean $3.81 million as of September 30, 2025, so you'd expect institutions to be running for the hills. But, while institutional ownership sits at only about 10.45%, insiders own a staggering 53.23% of the company, with CEO Snehal Patel recently buying another 10,600 shares in November 2025 alone. This is a management-backed gamble, pure and simple. What you need to know is whether the small institutional presence-firms like BlackRock, Inc. holding roughly 309K shares-is a sign of quiet confidence in the immunotherapy pipeline or just index-driven noise, and if that insider conviction is defintely enough to bridge the capital gap until the next major clinical milestone.
Who Invests in Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI) and Why?
You're looking at Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI) and trying to figure out who is buying this stock and what their game plan is. The quick takeaway is that this company is overwhelmingly a bet on its lead drug, GLSI-100, and its investor base is split between deeply committed insiders and a speculative mix of index funds and the general public.
The ownership structure is highly concentrated, which is typical for a clinical-stage biotech. Insiders, meaning executives and directors, own the lion's share, giving them effective control and a huge vested interest in the company's success. That means their decisions are defintely aligned with the stock price.
Key Investor Types and Their Holdings
The investor profile for Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. is not the usual mix you see in a large-cap stock. It's dominated by insiders and then rounded out by passive institutional money and the general public. As of late 2025, the breakdown shows a clear center of gravity.
Individual Insiders hold a commanding 52.5% of the company, representing the largest single group of shareholders. The CEO, Snehal Patel, is the most influential shareholder, holding an estimated 41% to 42% of the company's stock. This is a massive stake. Institutional Investors, which include mutual funds and pension funds, hold about 10.1% of the outstanding shares. These are not activist hedge funds; they are mostly passive index trackers.
The General Public, which includes individual retail investors and other non-institutional holders, accounts for the remaining 37.4% of the ownership. This high percentage often signals a speculative, high-conviction retail following, willing to ride the volatility of a Phase III clinical trial.
| Investor Type | Ownership Percentage (2025) | Shares Held (Approx.) |
|---|---|---|
| Individual Insiders | 52.5% | 7,268,698 |
| General Public (Retail/Other) | 37.4% | 5,187,720 |
| Institutional Investors | 10.1% | 1,398,121 |
Investment Motivations: Betting on a Blockbuster Drug
Investors aren't buying Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. for dividends-the company has none-or for current earnings. The motivation is pure growth potential tied to its single asset, GLSI-100, an immunotherapy to prevent breast cancer recurrence. The company is clinical-stage, so its revenue for the 2025 fiscal year is forecast to be $0, and the average analyst forecast for the full-year net loss is -$15,474,135.
The investment thesis hinges on the Phase III Flamingo-01 trial. The market opportunity is significant: the HER2-positive breast cancer treatment market is valued at $10.95 billion in 2025. If GLSI-100 is approved, analysts project that capturing just 5% of this market could translate into $685 million in annual revenue. That's a transformative figure for a company with a current market capitalization hovering around the $150 million mark.
- Growth Prospects: Success in the Phase III trial for GLSI-100.
- Market Position: Potential for a novel, well-tolerated immunotherapy in a multi-billion-dollar market.
- Catalyst: Interim analysis results from the Flamingo-01 trial, expected as early as mid-2026, which could trigger a massive stock price pop.
Investment Strategies: Long-Term Conviction vs. Short-Term Speculation
The strategies at play are a microcosm of the biotech sector: high-conviction long-term holding mixed with intense short-term trading. It's a high-stakes, binary-outcome stock.
Long-Term Holding and Value: This is the strategy of the insiders. CEO Snehal Patel has been consistently buying shares on the open market throughout 2025, even at prices higher than the current trading price. For example, he made an open market purchase on November 6, 2025, at $8.43 per share. This heavy insider buying signals a deep, long-term conviction that the company is undervalued relative to the future value of GLSI-100. This is a classic 'bet-on-management' scenario.
Passive Index Investing: Major institutional holders like BlackRock, Inc. and Vanguard Group Inc are present because Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. is included in indices like the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). These institutions are not making an active, fundamental bet on the drug; they are simply buying the stock because their index fund mandates require them to. They are passive, long-only holders.
Short-Term Trading and Speculation: The stock also sees significant short-term trading activity, which is a bet against the company. The high short interest-21.07% of the float as of November 13, 2025-indicates a substantial number of traders are betting the Phase III trial will fail. This is a high-risk, high-reward trade, and it's why the stock price can be so volatile. You can read more about the company's foundation and business model here: Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI): History, Ownership, Mission, How It Works & Makes Money.
Institutional Ownership and Major Shareholders of Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI)
You're looking at Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI) and wondering who the big money players are, and honestly, the ownership structure here is a bit unique. The direct takeaway is that while institutional investors provide a layer of credibility, this company is overwhelmingly controlled by its insiders, which changes the risk profile.
As of late 2025, the total institutional ownership sits at roughly 10.45% of the company's shares outstanding, representing about 1.5 million shares held by 120 different institutions. That's not a huge slice for a publicly traded biotech, but it's enough to signal professional interest. The real power lies with the insiders, who collectively own a massive 53% of the company, with CEO Snehal Patel holding a direct stake of around 41%.
Top Institutional Investors and Their Stakes
The institutional buyers are primarily passive funds-the big index trackers and asset managers-which is typical for a small-cap stock included in major indices like the Russell 2000. These funds buy GLSI because it's part of an index they must mirror, not necessarily because a portfolio manager did a deep-dive valuation on the GP2 immunotherapy program.
Here's a quick look at the top institutional holders and their share counts reported as of mid-2025:
| Institutional Investor | Shares Held (as of Jun/Sep 2025) | % of Shares Outstanding |
|---|---|---|
| BlackRock, Inc. | 367,181 | 2.69% |
| The Vanguard Group, Inc. | 269,002 | 1.97% |
| Geode Capital Management, LLC | 138,982 | 1.02% |
| iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 158,432 | 1.16% |
| State Street Global Advisors, Inc. | 82,247 | 0.60% |
BlackRock, Inc. and Vanguard Group Inc. are your two largest single institutional holders, owning a combined total of over 636,000 shares. They are mostly buying through their index funds, like the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Investor Shares (VTSMX).
Recent Shifts: Institutional Selling vs. Insider Buying
Looking at the near-term activity, institutional investors have shown a slight net decrease in their positions. In the most recent reporting quarter, institutional shares (Long) saw a net reduction of -5.83%, which translates to a decrease of about 0.09 million shares. This small dip suggests some funds are taking profits or rebalancing, but it's not a mass exodus.
But here's the key contrast, and it's defintely the more important signal: insiders are buying aggressively. Over the last year, insiders have purchased $8.41 million worth of shares in high-impact open-market transactions, with zero sales. CEO Snehal Patel has been particularly active, with purchases in late 2025, including a buy of 10,600 shares on November 6, 2025, for $89,358.00. This strong, consistent insider accumulation is a powerful sign of management's confidence in the company's future, particularly the Phase III clinical trial, FLAMINGO-01.
- Institutional ownership is slightly down, but insider buying is way up.
Impact on Stock Price and Strategy
The impact of institutional ownership on Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI)'s stock price and strategy is secondary to the influence of its insiders. With 53% control, the insiders-especially the CEO-have the final say on the company's direction, capital allocation, and operational execution. This high alignment means management's interests are tightly bound to shareholder returns, which is a significant plus for long-term investors.
The institutional presence, while small, does offer benefits:
- Liquidity: Their trading volume helps ensure there's a market for the stock.
- Credibility: Their ownership suggests the company meets the minimum requirements for inclusion in major indices, attracting other passive capital.
The company's strategy remains laser-focused on advancing its core asset, the GLSI-100 immunotherapy, which is currently in its Phase III clinical trial (FLAMINGO-01). Recent strategic moves, like the expansion of the trial to new European sites in late 2025, including Romania and Austria, are driven by the need to accelerate patient enrollment and reach the planned interim analysis. This clinical progress is what truly drives the stock price, not the modest institutional trading. For a deeper dive into the company's financials, you should check out Breaking Down Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
Here's the quick math on influence: Insider control is over five times that of institutional investors. That means you should track insider buying and clinical trial milestones far more closely than any minor institutional stake change.
Key Investors and Their Impact on Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI)
You're looking at Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI) and trying to figure out who's really driving the bus. The direct takeaway is this: Greenwich LifeSciences is fundamentally an insider-controlled company, not one swayed by the typical institutional giants. This means the CEO's actions are the most important signal, not a massive hedge fund's 13F filing.
As of September 2025, individual insiders own a commanding 53.23% of the company's shares outstanding, which is a huge block of stock. This concentration of ownership means that the strategic direction and long-term vision are tightly held by the management team and board, not dictated by external institutional pressure. The top four shareholders alone control over 51% of the business.
The single most influential investor is CEO Snehal Patel, who holds a massive 41% stake. When one person controls that much, their vested interest in the company's success is defintely aligned with yours, but it also means the stock can be less liquid and more volatile. For a clinical-stage biopharma company, this high insider ownership suggests deep conviction in the Phase III trial, Flamingo-01, and the potential of their immunotherapy, GLSI-100. You can read more about the core strategy here: Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI).
Institutional Buyers: Passive but Present
Institutional ownership remains low for a NASDAQ-listed company, hovering around 10.45% of shares outstanding. This is a classic profile for a micro-cap biotech: the big money is waiting for late-stage clinical data before jumping in with both feet. Still, some of the most recognizable names in asset management are on the roster, mostly through passive index funds.
Here's a quick look at the largest institutional holders, which are mostly passive managers:
- BlackRock, Inc.: A top holder, likely through their index funds, not an active bet.
- Vanguard Group Inc: Another major passive investor, holding shares in their total market and small-cap index funds.
- Geode Capital Management, LLC: An institutional player that has been accumulating shares.
- iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM): The company's inclusion in the Russell 2000 index forces index funds to buy, providing a baseline of institutional demand.
These large, passive positions provide some stability, but they don't exert the kind of activist influence you might see at a company like Apple or ExxonMobil. Their investment is a function of the company's size and index inclusion, not a deep-dive, active bet on the drug pipeline.
Recent Investor Moves and the 2025 Financial Picture
The most telling recent moves come from the insider side. CEO Snehal Patel has been consistently buying shares on the open market throughout 2025, which is a strong signal of confidence. For example, in November 2025, he purchased another 10,600 shares at a price of $8.43 per share, totaling $89,358.00. This isn't a massive amount in the grand scheme of the company's $115.23 million market capitalization, but it shows the CEO is putting his own cash on the line.
On the institutional front, we see quiet accumulation. Geode Capital Management, LLC, for instance, increased its stake by a modest 1.4% in the second quarter of 2025, bringing its total holding to 138,982 shares valued at approximately $1,261,000. Rhumbline Advisers also grew its position by 48.7% in the first quarter of 2025. This slow accumulation suggests institutional investors are monitoring the Phase III trial progress, particularly after the company announced preliminary safety data in April 2025.
Here's the quick math on the company's burn rate for the 2025 fiscal year. As a pre-revenue biotech (revenue was $0.00 for the trailing twelve months ending September 30, 2025), the focus is on cash burn. The net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, was $11,435,485. To fund this, the company successfully used an At The Market (ATM) offering, selling 621,674 shares and netting $6,308,784 between January 1 and September 30, 2025. The insider and institutional buying helps provide a floor for the stock, but the company's valuation is still a pure bet on the clinical outcome.
| Investor Category | Ownership % (Approx. Sep 2025) | Key Action in 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Individual Insiders (e.g., CEO Patel) | 53.23% | CEO purchased 10,600 shares in Nov 2025 for $89,358.00. |
| Institutional Investors (e.g., BlackRock, Vanguard) | 10.45% | Geode Capital Management increased stake by 1.4% in Q2 2025. |
| General Public (Retail) | ~36.32% | Passive investment, highly sensitive to clinical news. |
What this estimate hides is that any major clinical news-good or bad-will completely overshadow these ownership dynamics. The stock's high beta (a measure of volatility) means it's extremely sensitive to market movements and, critically, to any updates on the Phase III trial. Your next step should be to monitor the timeline for the interim analysis of the Flamingo-01 trial, as that is the next true catalyst for investor action.
Market Impact and Investor Sentiment
You're looking at Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI), a clinical-stage biotech, and the immediate takeaway is this: the people who know the company best-the insiders-are overwhelmingly bullish, but the broader market is still showing caution. This creates a fascinating disconnect. Insider sentiment is defintely positive, driven by consistent buying, but the stock's short-term price action remains constrained by the reality of a pre-revenue company.
The core investor profile is dominated by individual insiders, who hold an extraordinary 52.5% of the company's total shares outstanding. This level of ownership is a massive vote of confidence, signaling that management's financial interests are tightly aligned with those of outside shareholders. The CEO, Snehal Patel, is the largest single shareholder, holding a 40.3% stake, which was valued at approximately $46.5 million as of late 2025.
This high insider commitment is the most powerful indicator here. Over the last year, insiders have collectively purchased an estimated $8.41 million worth of shares in high-impact open-market transactions, with zero sales. For a biotech focused on its Phase III Flamingo-01 trial for its GP2 breast cancer immunotherapy, that tells you everything you need to know about the internal belief in the long-term value of the asset. You can read more about their focus here: Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI).
Institutional Ownership and Accumulation Trends
Institutional investors, the big funds and asset managers, hold a smaller but still significant piece of the pie, representing about 10.1% of the shares outstanding. This group includes major players like BlackRock, Inc. and Vanguard Group Inc.. While the percentage is modest for a Nasdaq-listed company, the trend shows recent accumulation, which is a good sign.
For example, in the second quarter of 2025, Marshall Wace LLP acquired a new position valued at $509,000, and Vanguard Group Inc. boosted its position by 4.9% in the third quarter. This institutional buying suggests that professional money managers are starting to build positions ahead of potential clinical milestones, even as the stock price has struggled.
- BlackRock, Inc.: A top institutional shareholder.
- Vanguard Group Inc.: Recently increased its stake.
- Geode Capital Management, Llc: Holds a significant position.
Recent Market Reactions and Short-Term Price Action
The stock market's reaction to news has been volatile, which is typical for a clinical-stage biotech. The stock closed at $8.13 per share on November 19, 2025, down from a 52-week high of $15.47. This drop reflects the market's general risk-off sentiment toward pre-revenue companies, plus the long timeline for the Phase III trial.
However, when Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. announced its Q3 2025 earnings on November 14, 2025, reporting an Earnings Per Share (EPS) loss of -$0.30, which met analyst consensus, the stock traded up 1.5% to $8.32. This positive reaction to simply meeting expectations, rather than missing them, suggests that the market is watching for stability and execution in the clinical trial process. The stock is currently in a short-term falling trend, which means you should expect continued volatility.
Analyst Perspectives and Valuation Disconnect
Wall Street analysts see a massive upside, creating a significant disconnect with the current trading price. The average brokerage recommendation for Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. is a consensus Hold rating, but this is based on an Average Brokerage Recommendation (ABR) score of 1.67 (where 1 is Strong Buy). Two out of three analysts currently rate the stock a Strong Buy.
The average one-year price target is a striking $42.00, with a high forecast of $47.25. Here's the quick math: based on the November 2025 stock price of $8.13, that target represents a potential upside of over 400%.
What this estimate hides is the binary risk of a biotech. The valuation is based on a successful outcome of the Phase III trial, which analysts project will lead to market entry around Fiscal Year (FY) 2028. For FY 2025, the reality is a forecasted annual revenue of $0 million and a projected annual Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT) loss of -$10 million. This is a high-risk, high-reward proposition.
To be fair, the company is executing on its plan, reporting a net loss of $4.15 million for Q3 2025, primarily due to a surge in research and development expenses to $3.52 million. That's the cost of advancing a potential blockbuster drug. As of September 30, 2025, the cash position was $3.81 million, down from $5.82 million at the end of 2024, so capital management remains a key focus.
| Key Financial Metric (FY 2025) | Value/Forecast | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2025 Net Loss | -$4.15 million | |
| Q3 2025 EPS | -$0.30 (Met Consensus) | |
| Cash Position (Sep 30, 2025) | $3.81 million | |
| FY 2025 Revenue Forecast | $0 million | |
| Average Analyst Price Target | $42.00 |
Your next step should be to monitor the Phase III enrollment updates and any new insider buying, as those are the most actionable signals right now.

Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. (GLSI) DCF Excel Template
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.