Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) Bundle
You're looking at Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) and wondering who is defintely buying into the stock right now, and more importantly, why they are holding given the mixed signals; the short answer is that institutional giants are making a clear, near-term bet on a strong 2025 recovery, positioning for a significant rebound in the company's core social networking segments. Major players like BlackRock, Inc. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. are among the top institutional holders, with filings as of Q3 2025 showing a total of roughly 79.1 million shares held by institutions, representing an institutional ownership percentage around 74.13% of the float. This conviction is grounded in analyst projections for the 2025 fiscal year, which point to an annual revenue consensus of approximately $1.45 Billion and a corresponding Earnings Per Share (EPS) estimate of $0.72. The market is clearly pricing in a successful turnaround, with the average analyst price target sitting at $10.00; so, the real question for you is this: are you comfortable with the risk/reward profile of a stock where the street sees a potential upside of over 46%, or do you see a near-term risk that the company's core Momo and Tantan platforms won't deliver on that projected growth?
Who Invests in Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) and Why?
The investor base for Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) is a fascinating mix, heavily weighted toward professional money managers. The direct takeaway is that institutional investors own the majority of the company, and their investment thesis appears to be a blend of deep value (given the low valuation multiples) and income generation, despite the company's recent revenue deceleration in its core domestic market.
As of mid-2025, institutional players-the mutual funds, pension funds, and insurance companies-control roughly 51% to 52% of the stock. That's a controlling interest, meaning their decisions can significantly influence the stock price and corporate governance. The general public, or retail investors, hold a smaller but still defintely notable stake of about 19%, with company insiders owning around 25%. This ownership structure means you have to pay close attention to institutional sentiment.
Here is a snapshot of the major institutional holders, based on 2025 filings:
| Institutional Holder | Approximate Ownership Percentage (2025) | Shares Held (Approximate) |
|---|---|---|
| J O Hambro Capital Management Limited | 7.29% | 11,630,447 |
| Renaissance Technologies LLC | 5.14% | 8,190,290 |
| The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 4.92% | 7,841,311 |
| The Vanguard Group, Inc. | 3.00% | 4,785,206 |
| BlackRock, Inc. | 2.51% | 3,995,985 |
Investment Motivations: Value, Income, and Overseas Growth
Investors are attracted to Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) for a few concrete reasons that map directly to its financial profile. It's not a pure growth story anymore, but a value-and-income proposition with a clear growth catalyst in its overseas expansion.
The primary draw is the company's valuation and capital return. The stock traded at a very low Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 5.07 as of April 2025. This screams 'value investing' to professional investors, suggesting the market is significantly undervaluing its current earnings power. Plus, the annual dividend payout of $0.30 per share translates to a high dividend yield, sitting between 4.3% and 4.44% in 2025, which is a big magnet for income-focused funds.
The second major motivation is the explosive growth in overseas markets. While total net revenues for Q2 2025 were RMB2,620.4 million (US$365.8 million), a slight year-over-year decrease of 2.6%, net revenues from overseas operations surged by a massive 72.7% to RMB442.4 million (US$61.8 million) in the same quarter. This overseas success, driven by brands like Souchill, is the new growth narrative that keeps the institutional money interested. You can find more on the business model and revenue streams here: Hello Group Inc. (MOMO): History, Ownership, Mission, How It Works & Makes Money.
Investment Strategies: The Value Trap vs. The Activist Play
The strategies used by these different investor types are clear-cut. For a stock with a low P/E and a high dividend yield, you typically see two main approaches:
- Long-Term Value Holding: Large institutional investors like Vanguard and BlackRock, which often manage passive index funds, are long-term holders. They buy because the company is included in their benchmark indices and the valuation metrics suggest a margin of safety. They collect the dividend and wait for the P/E multiple to expand back to historical or peer averages.
- Income and Dividend Harvesting: Many investors are simply buying for the dividend yield. A 4%+ annual yield is hard to find in the tech sector, so they are essentially using the stock as a high-yield bond alternative, betting the company can maintain its profitability and capital return policy.
Then you have the more active players, like hedge funds, which hold about 5.1% of the shares. These funds often employ a different strategy:
- Short-Term Trading and Activism: Hedge funds are looking for a catalyst to create near-term value. Given the low valuation, they might pressure management to increase share buybacks-the company has a remaining buyback program size of US$185.8 million as of September 2025-or to spin off a growing asset like the overseas business. Their trading can make the stock price vulnerable to sudden moves, so you need to watch their filings closely.
This is a classic deep-value scenario. The market sees risk (decline in core domestic revenue), but the investors see a cheap stock with a strong cash flow that pays a hefty dividend, plus a high-growth option in the overseas segment. The action item for you is to weigh the risk of the core business decline against the growth of the overseas segment and the safety of that $0.30 dividend.
Institutional Ownership and Major Shareholders of Hello Group Inc. (MOMO)
You need to know who is really calling the shots at Hello Group Inc. (MOMO), and the answer is that institutional money holds the balance of power, controlling over 50% of the shares outstanding. This high level of institutional ownership-around 51% to 52% of the company-means their collective trading decisions can make or break the stock price in the near term, so tracking their moves is crucial for your investment strategy.
To be fair, the single largest shareholder is still CEO Yan Tang, who holds a substantial 25% of the shares outstanding, a figure that shows significant insider alignment with shareholder interests. But the institutional group, with total holdings valued at approximately $483 million as of the third quarter of 2025, represents the dominant voting bloc outside of the founder.
Top Institutional Investors: Who Holds the Keys?
The institutional landscape for Hello Group Inc. is a mix of quantitative hedge funds, major asset managers, and index funds. This diverse group holds a total of over 79.1 million shares, but a handful of firms account for the bulk of that ownership.
Here's the quick math: the top seven shareholders own more than half the company's shares. This concentration suggests that while the largest institutions have outsized influence, the interests of smaller institutional holders still play a role in balancing the overall strategic direction.
The largest institutional holders, based on the latest filings for the quarter ended September 30, 2025, are:
- Renaissance Technologies LLC: Holding 8,173,090 shares.
- Goldman Sachs Group Inc.: Holding 6,923,918 shares.
- Acadian Asset Management LLC: Holding 6,326,491 shares.
- The Vanguard Group, Inc.: Holding 4,772,747 shares.
- BlackRock, Inc.: Holding 3,440,355 shares.
It's defintely worth noting that J O Hambro Capital Management Limited was also cited as a major holder, owning approximately 7.2% of the common stock earlier in 2025. These are the firms you need to watch, as their investment theses drive major capital flows.
Recent Shifts: Have Investors Been Buying or Selling?
The third quarter of 2025 saw a clear trend of net selling among several of the largest institutional holders, though not uniformly across the board. This isn't a panic, but it is a signal of some re-evaluation of the stock's near-term prospects by key players.
For example, in the quarter ending September 30, 2025, a number of major holders reduced their stakes:
- Goldman Sachs Group Inc. cut its position by 917,393 shares.
- BlackRock, Inc. reduced its holding by 555,630 shares.
- Acadian Asset Management LLC sold 303,181 shares.
Still, other large investors saw this as a buying opportunity. LSV Asset Management increased its position by 173,424 shares, and Causeway Capital Management Llc added a significant 448,123 shares. Plus, Assenagon Asset Management S.A. dramatically increased its shares held by over 406.6% as of October 7, 2025, showing a strong conviction from at least one European asset manager. Overall, institutional investors have purchased a total of over 23 million shares in the last two years, representing about $173.52 million in transactions, indicating long-term accumulation despite recent quarterly shifts.
Impact of Institutional Investors on Stock and Strategy
The role of these large investors is twofold: they exert significant influence on the company's stock price and its corporate strategy. Because institutions own the lion's share of the float, the stock price is inherently vulnerable to their collective trading decisions. If multiple institutions decide to exit a position simultaneously, you could see a rapid and sharp drop in the share price.
More importantly, with over 50% ownership, these institutions can strongly influence board decisions, especially on matters requiring shareholder approval. Hedge funds, which hold about 5.1% of Hello Group Inc. shares, are particularly interesting because they often seek to engage with management to bring about changes that create near-term value. This can translate into pressure for share buybacks, dividend increases, or strategic shifts in the company's focus, such as the evolution of its platforms detailed in Hello Group Inc. (MOMO): History, Ownership, Mission, How It Works & Makes Money.
What this estimate hides is the difference between passive (index) funds and active managers. Passive funds like those from Vanguard Group Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. are essentially permanent holders, while the active managers like Renaissance Technologies LLC are the ones driving the volatility and strategic pressure. You need to distinguish between those who simply track the index and those who are making an active bet on the company's future.
Key Investors and Their Impact on Hello Group Inc. (MOMO)
If you're looking at Hello Group Inc. (MOMO), you need to know who else is sitting at the table, because their moves defintely dictate the stock's near-term trajectory. The direct takeaway is this: institutional investors-the big funds-control the majority of the stock, but the CEO's substantial insider stake acts as a powerful counterbalance.
As of late 2025, institutional ownership hovers around 51% to 52% of the shares outstanding, which is a massive voting bloc. This means the board and management, including CEO Yan Tang, must pay close attention to the preferences of these large institutions. You can't ignore a group that collectively owns over half the company, especially when the total market capitalization is around US$1.4 billion.
However, the single largest shareholder is an insider: CEO Yan Tang. His stake is significant, recently climbing to approximately 28.60% of the company as of September 2025. This dual structure-high institutional ownership alongside a dominant founder stake-creates a unique dynamic where outside pressure meets strong internal control. This is why you see a mix of growth-focused investment and a management team that can still drive its long-term vision.
The Heavy Hitters: Notable Institutional Owners
The institutional roster for Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) includes some of the most recognized names in global finance. These aren't retail investors chasing headlines; they are funds with deep research teams. Their presence lends a certain credibility to the stock, but their collective trading can also make the price vulnerable to sharp moves, a classic crowded trade risk.
Key institutional investors, including BlackRock, Inc. and Vanguard Group Inc., are primarily passive investors, tracking indices, but the list also features active managers and hedge funds like Renaissance Technologies LLC. These active funds, which hold about 5.1% of the shares, are often the ones looking for a medium-term catalyst to unlock value, which is where the potential for activist influence lies.
Here's the quick math on some of the top institutional positions and their recent activity as of the third quarter (Q3) of the 2025 fiscal year, based on 13F filings:
| Institutional Owner | Shares Held (9/30/2025) | Change in Shares (Q3 2025) | Value ($1000s, Est.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologies Llc | 8,173,090 | -17,200 | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 6,923,918 | -917,393 | N/A |
| Acadian Asset Management Llc | 6,326,491 | -303,181 | N/A |
| Vanguard Group Inc | 4,772,747 | -12,459 | $35,414 |
| BlackRock, Inc. | 3,440,355 | -555,630 | N/A |
What this estimate hides is the underlying motivation. The general trend in Q3 2025 shows a number of major holders, including BlackRock, Inc. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc., slightly reducing their positions, suggesting some profit-taking or a cautious stance on the near-term outlook.
Investor Influence: The Power of the 52% Stake
When institutions own over half the company, they have the power to influence major corporate decisions, from approving mergers to electing board members. Their investment motivations are clear, and they are generally focused on two things:
- Seeking exposure to Hello Group Inc. (MOMO)'s strong market position in the Chinese social networking and entertainment space.
- Anticipating continued expansion and increasing profitability, especially from overseas growth.
This pursuit of growth is critical. For instance, the company's Q2 2025 financial results showed overseas net revenues jumping by 72.7% year-over-year to RMB442.4 million (US$61.8 million), a clear signal that management's strategy to diversify is resonating with growth-oriented investors.
Recent Portfolio Shifts: The Q1-Q3 2025 Trading Story
The first three quarters of 2025 saw a flurry of activity, indicating a re-evaluation of the stock by various funds. While some large, passive funds made minor trims, several active managers made significant, conviction-driven moves. This tells you the market is divided on the stock's immediate future, especially after the Q2 2025 net loss of RMB139.4 million (US$19.5 million).
On the buying side, CAUSEWAY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC was a notable accumulator, adding 1,205,166 shares (a 136.2% increase) in Q1 2025. This kind of aggressive buying suggests a belief that the stock is fundamentally undervalued, perhaps betting on a turnaround in the core domestic business or the continued success of the overseas expansion. Similarly, MORGAN STANLEY added over 1.2 million shares in Q1 2025.
Conversely, some funds completely exited their positions, with BRIGHT VALLEY CAPITAL LTD and FIRST BEIJING INVESTMENT LTD removing nearly all their shares in Q1 2025, selling off an estimated $29.3 million and $17.4 million worth of stock, respectively. These large-scale exits often signal a loss of faith in the company's near-term execution or a shift in capital allocation strategy away from the Chinese internet sector. To understand the full context of these moves, you should look at the company's underlying performance: Breaking Down Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
Market Impact and Investor Sentiment
You're looking at Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) and seeing a stock with a split personality, and honestly, that's exactly what the investor profile shows. The sentiment from major shareholders is currently a mix of cautious optimism driven by overseas growth and deep-seated concern over domestic performance, translating into a technical market sentiment that is defintely bearish. As of November 2025, the technical indicators signal a Bearish sentiment, with the Fear & Greed Index sitting at 39 (Fear).
The core of the issue is a stark divergence in the company's business segments. While the domestic operations struggle-Q2 2025 net revenues declined by 2.6% year-over-year to RMB2,620.4 million-the overseas business is surging, with overseas revenues up a massive 72.7% in the same quarter. This means institutional investors, who own a controlling stake, are balancing the risk of a shrinking home market against the opportunity in international expansion. They are looking for a clear path to profitability that doesn't rely on the legacy Momo app's user base, which has been declining.
The Institutional vs. Insider Stake
The ownership structure of Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) is a classic 'insider-controlled with heavy institutional backing' scenario. Institutional investors, the big money like mutual funds and hedge funds, collectively own a controlling stake of approximately 51% to 52% of the company. This is a double-edged sword: their large block ownership lends credibility, but their collective trading decisions can make the stock price extremely vulnerable. You need to watch their 13F filings closely.
Plus, the insiders-the executives and board-hold a significant stake, around 23% to 25% of the shares outstanding. The CEO, Yan Tang, is the single largest shareholder, controlling approximately 25% of the common stock. This high insider ownership is a positive signal for alignment with long-term shareholder interests, but it also concentrates power, which limits the influence of outside activist investors. The top seven shareholders alone hold 50% of the business.
Key institutional investors include:
- J O Hambro Capital Management Limited: Holds 7.2% of common stock.
- Renaissance Technologies LLC: Holds about 5.1% of the company stock.
- Vanguard Group Inc.: One of the top institutional investors.
Recent Market Reactions to Ownership Moves
The stock market has reacted violently to both good and bad news in 2025, underscoring the volatility inherent in a stock with high institutional ownership. When the company hit a US$1.4 billion market cap around July 2025, institutional investors benefited from a one-year return to shareholders of approximately 40%. That's a strong return, but the volatility is real.
For example, the stock had a sharp drop of -9.43% on March 12, 2025, following an analyst downgrade rooted in concerns over user growth momentum. Then, in September 2025, the market punished the stock hard after the Q2 earnings report. The company reported a significant earnings per share (EPS) miss-an EPS of -0.84 against a forecasted 1.66-which caused the stock to fall by 12.56% in premarket trading. That's a clear action-reaction. The market is very sensitive to any signs of domestic struggle, even when overseas revenue growth is strong. You can learn more about the strategic direction that drives this growth in the Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Hello Group Inc. (MOMO).
Analyst Perspectives and Investor Impact
Analyst perspectives on Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) are fractured, which reflects the mixed financial signals. The consensus rating is a 'Hold' based on a broader look at analyst actions over the last 12 months, but the average price target from covering analysts is $10.00, representing a forecasted upside of 46.20% from the current price (as of November 2025). This disconnect tells you analysts see deep value, but also significant near-term risk. The low price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 7.69 suggests the stock is trading at a less expensive valuation than the market average P/E of about 37.01. The valuation indicates potential upside, but the stock is still being priced for a lack of growth in its core business.
The impact of key investors is most visible in the company's strategic shift toward international markets and AI. The institutional pressure to find new growth drivers is evident in the Q2 2025 results: total revenue was $364.4M for the quarter, but the overseas revenue surge of 72.7% is the clear focus. The analysts' bullish price targets are largely predicated on the success of this international expansion and the company's focus on AI-driven product innovations, which are expected to drive profitability and reverse the domestic revenue declines.
Here's the quick math on the Q2 2025 results that drives the analyst debate:
| Metric | Q2 2025 Value (RMB) | Year-over-Year Change |
|---|---|---|
| Net Revenues | RMB2,620.4 million | -2.6% Decline |
| Overseas Revenues | (Portion of Net Revenues) | +72.7% Surge |
| Net Loss Attributable to Company | RMB140.2 million | Shift from Q2 2024 Net Income |
What this estimate hides is the impact of an additional withholding tax accrual in Q2 2025, which exacerbated the net loss. The analysts who maintain a 'Buy' rating are essentially betting that the 72.7% overseas revenue growth will eventually overwhelm the domestic headwinds and tax-related issues. The ones with a 'Hold' or 'Sell' are simply waiting for proof that the domestic decline can be arrested.

Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) DCF Excel Template
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.