NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS) Bundle
You're defintely looking at the numbers for NSTS Bancorp, Inc. and asking a fair question: why are institutional investors still buying a community bank with a market capitalization of just $57.69 million that just posted a negative price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of -68.81? The surface data is rough; their Q3 2025 earnings reported only $0.01 EPS on $2.51 million in revenue, plus analysts maintain a consensus 'Sell' rating. But, institutional ownership is still a substantial 23.70% of the stock, and firms like Alliancebernstein L.P. are quietly increasing their position, adding to their 518,324 shares worth nearly $6 million in the third quarter of 2025. So, is this a deep-value play on the bank's underlying loan portfolio-which hit $130.4 million in net loans at the end of 2024-or are these sophisticated players simply betting on a future acquisition premium? You have to wonder: what are they seeing in the balance sheet that the market's 'Sell' consensus is missing?
Who Invests in NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS) and Why?
You're looking at NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS) and trying to figure out who's actually buying a regional bank with a small market cap. The investor base is a classic mix of local long-term holders and institutional value players, but the motivations are starkly different, especially since the company doesn't pay a dividend.
Key Investor Types and Ownership Breakdown
The ownership structure of NSTS Bancorp, Inc. is split between large, professional money managers and a significant base of retail and insider investors, which is typical for a community bank. As of late 2025, institutional investors hold approximately 23.70% of the stock. This is a notable chunk, but it means the majority of shares are still held by non-institutional players, including individual retail investors and company insiders.
The insider ownership-directors and executives-stands at a substantial 6.20%, which suggests a deep, vested interest in the long-term success of the Illinois-based North Shore Trust and Savings. The institutional side is led by firms like Alliancebernstein L.P., which reported owning 518,324 shares in their Q3 2025 filing, a stake worth about $5.98 million. That's a serious commitment from a major player.
Here's the quick math on the major holders:
| Investor Type | Ownership Percentage (2025) | Approximate Motivation |
| Institutional Investors | 23.70% | Value, M&A Speculation, Low Beta |
| Insider Holders | 6.20% | Long-Term Stability, Local Commitment |
| Retail/Other Investors | ~70.10% | Local Loyalty, Post-IPO Hold |
Investment Motivations: Value Over Income
Honestly, no one is buying NSTS Bancorp, Inc. for income. The company does not currently pay a dividend, so you can immediately rule out the traditional dividend-focused investor. Instead, the primary motivation for institutional money is a deep-value play based on the balance sheet, plus the potential for an acquisition.
The core attraction is the company's valuation relative to its assets. The Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio for NSTS Bancorp, Inc. was around 0.78 in Q2 2025, meaning the stock trades at a discount to its book value (the theoretical value of its assets if liquidated). The book value per share as of September 30, 2025, was approximately $15.08, while the stock price was hovering around $11.01. That's a significant margin of safety for a value investor.
Growth prospects are also improving, albeit slowly. The Net Interest Margin (NIM)-the difference between interest income and interest paid to depositors-improved to 3.08% in Q3 2025, up from 2.96% in the prior year. This shows the core banking business is becoming more profitable in a rising rate environment, even though the company reported a year-to-date net loss of $521,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025. You're betting on the turn, not the current results. For a deeper dive into the company's strategic focus, you should review the Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS).
Investment Strategies: M&A Speculation and Value
Given the low P/B ratio and the small market capitalization of about $57.69 million, the most common institutional strategy here is a classic value investment coupled with merger and acquisition (M&A) speculation. Regional banks often become targets for larger financial institutions looking to expand their footprint or acquire deposits at a discount.
This isn't just theory, either. At the May 21, 2025 Annual Meeting, a non-binding stockholder proposal recommending the sale or merger of the Company was put to a vote. This concrete action shows that a significant portion of the shareholder base is actively pushing for a sale to 'unlock value' from the discounted book price. It's a clear, near-term catalyst many investors are banking on.
- Buy-and-Hold: Long-term investors, especially local retail holders, focus on the stability of the community bank model.
- Value Investing: Buying below book value (P/B of 0.78) and waiting for a market correction or M&A event.
- Activist/M&A Strategy: Taking a stake to push for a sale or merger, which was demonstrated in the 2025 proxy vote.
For the value investor, the current price is defintely attractive against the book value, but you must acknowledge the risk of a negative P/E ratio and the ongoing net loss. The strategy is simple: Buy low, wait for the bank to be acquired, or for the market to recognize the intrinsic value of the assets.
Institutional Ownership and Major Shareholders of NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS)
If you're looking at NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS), you need to know who the major shareholders are. Institutional investors-the mutual funds, pension funds, and asset managers-hold a significant piece of the pie, and their actions are a clear indicator of market sentiment. As of the most recent filings, institutional investors collectively own about 23.70% of the company's stock. That's a quarter of the company, and it gives them real power over the company's direction.
The investor profile here is typical for a smaller, regional bank: you see a mix of local retail investors and larger asset managers looking for value plays or stable, if slow, returns. The total market capitalization is relatively small at approximately $57.69 million, which means a single large institutional trade can have a disproportionate impact on the stock price.
Top Institutional Investors and Their Holdings
When we look at the 13F filings-the quarterly reports that institutional investment managers must file-one name stands out clearly in the third quarter of 2025: Alliancebernstein L.P. They are the anchor investor, and their stake is substantial enough to warrant close attention. This isn't just a passive investment; it's a conviction bet.
Here's a quick look at the most significant institutional holding data available for the 2025 fiscal year:
| Institutional Investor | Shares Held (Q3 2025) | Value (Q3 2025) | Percentage of NSTS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliancebernstein L.P. | 518,324 | $5,981,000 | 9.89% |
| Miracle Mile Advisors LLC | N/A | N/A | 0.21% |
| Other Institutions (Collective) | N/A | N/A | ~13.60% |
Alliancebernstein L.P.'s position, valued at nearly $6 million, represents a very high concentration of institutional capital in NSTS Bancorp, Inc. For a company with only 5,247,826 shares outstanding as of March 27, 2025, that 9.89% stake is defintely a controlling interest in the institutional segment.
Recent Shifts in Institutional Ownership
The near-term trend in institutional buying is more important than the static ownership list. In the third quarter of 2025, the largest holder, Alliancebernstein L.P., actually increased its position. They bought an additional 3,022 shares, representing a 0.6% increase in their stake. This is a small but telling vote of confidence from a major player, especially when the stock has been trading below both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages.
What this tells me is that despite the company's recent weak fundamentals-a negative P/E ratio of -68.81 and a negative return on equity (ROE) of -1.04%-some large investors see a catalyst coming. They aren't buying for current earnings, which were only $0.01 EPS in the last quarter on $2.51 million in revenue. They are buying for a future event.
- Major holder increased stake by 0.6% in Q3 2025.
- The market cap of $57.69 million makes the stock highly sensitive to institutional trading.
- Low trading volume-just 206 shares traded on a recent day-amplifies the impact of any large institutional move.
The Impact of Institutional Investors on Strategy
Large institutional investors are not just passive shareholders; they are a powerful force shaping corporate strategy. When nearly a quarter of your stock is held by these entities, management has to listen. For NSTS Bancorp, Inc., this influence is already visible in the strategic discussions happening right now.
The most concrete example of institutional influence is the non-binding stockholder proposal scheduled for the May 21, 2025, Annual Meeting: a recommendation that the company engage an investment banking firm to guide a potential merger or sale of the Company. This is the ultimate catalyst play, and it's what drives many institutional investors in a small-cap bank like this.
Here's the quick math: If a bank has a low price-to-book value (P/B) ratio-NSTS Bancorp, Inc.'s is 0.76-it makes them an attractive acquisition target. Institutional investors, especially those with a large stake, will push for a sale because it often results in a quick, significant premium over the current trading price, maximizing their return. Their buying activity suggests they believe this path to Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS) may be changing soon. The Board is already recommending a vote on the ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2025, which shows they are preparing for the year ahead, but the merger proposal is the real swing factor.
Key Investors and Their Impact on NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS)
The investor base for NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS) is a unique mix, dominated by a large retail shareholder component, but with a few key institutions and insiders who exert disproportionate influence, particularly around strategic direction. The core takeaway is that the company's future is currently being debated between a small group of institutional holders who favor growth or a sale, and the large block of retail and insider owners who may prefer the status quo of a community bank.
As of the most recent filings, institutional investors hold only about 23.70% of the stock, which is relatively low for a publicly traded bank. This leaves a massive 69.66% of the shares in the hands of individual retail investors, plus the 6.20% held by company insiders. This structure means that while a few big funds can move the stock, the collective will of the local, long-term retail base and management carries significant weight in a proxy vote. It's a bank where the small investor truly matters.
Notable Institutional and Insider Holders
The institutional landscape is led by Alliancebernstein L.P., which is the single largest institutional owner. Their position gives them a clear voice in the company's direction, even if they aren't a traditional activist fund.
- Alliancebernstein L.P.: Holds a 9.89% stake, equating to 518,324 shares valued at approximately $5.981 million (based on the Q3 2025 filing price). This is a substantial position relative to the company's modest market capitalization of about $57.69 million.
- Vanguard Group Inc.: One of the world's largest asset managers, holding a significant passive stake that tracks the market.
- Stephen G. Lear: The Chairman, CEO, and President, he is the largest individual shareholder, owning 67,599 shares or 1.29% of the company. Insider alignment is defintely a factor here.
Here's a quick look at the top institutional ownership as of the most recent 13F filings:
| Investor Name | Shares Held | Ownership Percentage | Value (Approx.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliancebernstein L.P. | 518,324 | 9.89% | $5.981 Million |
| Vanguard Group Inc. | 248,312 | 4.74% | $2.73 Million |
| Raffles Associates LP | 93,774 | 1.79% | $1.03 Million |
| Geode Capital Management LLC | 46,610 | 0.89% | $512.71 Thousand |
Investor Influence: The Push for a Strategic Sale
The key influence of these investors maps directly to the company's strategic future. For a small bank with total assets of $269.8 million as of September 30, 2025, and a book value per share of approximately $15.08, the stock trading around $11.01 suggests a significant discount to tangible value. This gap is the primary driver of activist-style investor interest.
This valuation disconnect led to a critical moment at the May 21, 2025 Annual Meeting, where a non-binding stockholder proposal was put forth. The proposal recommended that the company engage an investment banking firm to guide a merger or sale of the Company. This is the clearest sign of shareholder pressure to unlock the value hidden in the balance sheet. For context on the company's financial standing, you should review Breaking Down NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
The institutional investors, especially those focused on value like Alliancebernstein L.P., are often the ones pushing for such strategic alternatives (a sale or merger) to close the price-to-book value gap. Here's the quick math: if the stock traded at book value, its price would be closer to $15.08 per share, a roughly 37% premium to the current market price.
Recent Moves and Actionable Insights
The most important recent moves show a subtle but real tug-of-war between management and value-focused investors. The increase in Alliancebernstein L.P.'s stake by 0.6% in the third quarter of 2025 suggests they are doubling down on their position, likely in anticipation of a strategic event or a belief that the management team will eventually act to close the valuation gap.
- Institutional Buying: Alliancebernstein L.P. increased its stake, signaling confidence in the long-term value, which often means an expectation of a sale or significant operational improvements.
- Activist Pressure: The non-binding merger/sale proposal in May 2025 is a clear action point. While non-binding, it forces the Board to formally consider a sale process.
- Insider/Board Action: The appointment of John S. Pucin to the Board of Directors in June 2025 is a move to strengthen the leadership, which could be a defensive measure against activist pressure or a proactive step toward a strategic review.
The net income of $65,000 reported for Q3 2025, an improvement over the prior year's loss, gives management some breathing room, but it doesn't solve the core valuation problem. You need to watch the next few proxy filings; if more institutions join the call for a sale, the pressure on the Board will become overwhelming. The small float and high retail ownership mean any coordinated institutional move could have a sharp impact on the stock price.
Market Impact and Investor Sentiment
If you're looking at NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS), the immediate takeaway is a deep split in sentiment: Wall Street analysts are bearish, but a significant portion of the shareholder base is actively pushing for a strategic change. The consensus among the one analyst covering the stock is a firm Sell rating, with Weiss Ratings specifically reaffirming a 'sell (d-)' as of October 2025.
The institutional investor profile for NSTS Bancorp, Inc. is thin, which is often a red flag for a small-cap bank. Institutional investors hold only 23.70% of the company's stock. The largest institutional holder, Alliancebernstein L.P., increased its stake slightly in Q3 2025, now owning 9.89% of the shares, valued at approximately $5,981,000. This small increase from a major player suggests a long-term, value-oriented position, not a conviction play on near-term growth.
Here's the quick math on the ownership structure:
- Institutional Ownership: 23.70%
- Insider Ownership: 6.20%
- Largest Institutional Holder: Alliancebernstein L.P. (9.89%)
Recent Market Reactions and Liquidity Risk
The stock market's response to NSTS Bancorp, Inc. has been one of low interest and low liquidity, which is a near-term risk. On a recent trading day in November 2025, only 206 shares changed hands, representing a staggering 95% decline from the average daily volume of 4,553 shares. Low liquidity means any large block trade, either buying or selling, can disproportionately move the stock price. The stock is defintely trending down, trading at around $11.01, which is below both its 50-day moving average of $11.36 and its 200-day moving average of $11.85.
The stock's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is negative at -68.81, reflecting the company's weak profitability, despite a Q3 2025 net income of $65,000 (or $0.01 EPS). The market capitalization is small, sitting around $57.7 million, which further explains the low trading volume and high volatility risk.
Analyst Perspectives on Investor Impact
The single analyst perspective is clear: a Sell rating is tied to the fundamentals-a negative net margin of 6.17% and a negative return on equity (ROE) of 1.04% for the recent quarter. However, what this analyst estimate hides is the internal pressure for a sale or merger, which is the real investor catalyst to watch. At the May 21, 2025 Annual Meeting, a non-binding stockholder proposal recommending the sale or merger of the Company received a substantial vote of 1,564,131 shares For the proposal.
This suggests that nearly 40% of the shares voted at the meeting are looking for a strategic exit, which is a powerful signal of dissatisfaction with the current trajectory. The key investors here are those who voted For the proposal. They are betting on an acquisition premium, not organic growth. For a deeper dive into the company's background and structure, you can read NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS): History, Ownership, Mission, How It Works & Makes Money.
The table below summarizes the core financial data driving the negative analyst view versus the potential shareholder action:
| Metric | Value (Q3 2025 / Nov 2025) | Investor Takeaway |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus Analyst Rating | Sell | Negative outlook on current operations. |
| Q3 2025 Net Income | $65,000 | Marginal profitability, but an improvement from Q3 2024 loss. |
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | -68.81 | Fundamentals are weak; the company is not generating consistent profit. |
| Votes for Sale/Merger Proposal | 1,564,131 | Significant shareholder base is pushing for a strategic exit. |
| Stock Price (Nov 2025) | $11.01 | Low trading volume and below key moving averages. |
Your action now should be to monitor SEC filings for any new 13D or 13G filings, which would signal a new activist investor taking a large stake. Finance: track the non-accrual loans, which rose to $285,000 as of September 30, 2025, a small but important credit quality indicator.

NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS) DCF Excel Template
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.