ShotSpotter, Inc. (SSTI): Análisis PESTLE [Actualizado en enero de 2025]

En el panorama en rápida evolución de las tecnologías de seguridad urbana, ShotSpotter, Inc. emerge como un jugador fundamental, desplegando sensores acústicos de vanguardia que prometen revolucionar cómo las comunidades y la policía responden a la posible violencia armada. A medida que las ciudades se enfrentan a las tasas de criminalidad crecientes y la necesidad urgente de soluciones innovadoras de seguridad pública, este análisis integral de mano de mortero revela las dimensiones multifacéticas que dan forma al posicionamiento estratégico de Shotspotter, explorando la intrincada interacción de factores políticos, económicos, sociológicos, legales y ambientales que Definir su potencial transformador en los ecosistemas de seguridad urbana modernos.

Shotspotter, Inc. (SSTI) - Análisis de mortero: factores políticos

Aumento de las tasas de criminalidad urbana e interés gubernamental

Según el programa de informes de delitos uniformes del FBI (UCR), las tasas de criminalidad violentos en las principales ciudades estadounidenses aumentaron un 5,6% en 2022. La tecnología ShotSpotter se implementa actualmente en más de 130 ciudades en los Estados Unidos.

Ciudad	Cobertura de shotspotter	Aumento de la tasa de criminalidad anual
Chicago	100 millas cuadradas	4.8%
Ciudad de Nueva York	50 millas cuadradas	6.2%
San Francisco	25 millas cuadradas	3.9%

Financiación policial y adquisición de tecnología

El Departamento de Justicia de los Estados Unidos asignó $ 465 millones para soluciones de seguridad pública impulsadas por la tecnología en el año fiscal 2023. Los contratos gubernamentales de Shotspotter totalizaron aproximadamente $ 35.2 millones en 2022.

• Financiación federal para tecnologías de prevención del delito urbano: $ 187.6 millones
• Presupuestos de adquisición de tecnología a nivel estatal: $ 278.4 millones
• Tasa de crecimiento del contrato gubernamental de Shotspotter: 12.3% año tras año

Regulaciones de vigilancia estatal y local

A partir de 2024, 27 estados tienen una legislación específica que aborda las tecnologías de detección de disparos acústicos, con diferentes estándares de protección de la privacidad.

Categoría regulatoria	Número de estados	Complejidad regulatoria
Regulaciones de privacidad estrictas	12	Alto
Restricciones de privacidad moderadas	15	Medio

Debates predictivos de vigilancia y efectividad de la tecnología

Los estudios independientes muestran que los rangos de precisión de ShotSpotter entre 80-92% en entornos urbanos. Las audiencias del Congreso en 2023 discutieron el papel de la tecnología en la aplicación de la ley.

• Audiencias totales del Congreso sobre tecnologías de vigilancia predictiva: 7
• Estudios académicos sobre la precisión de la detección de disparos: 23
• Tasa de precisión tecnológica promedio: 86.5%

Shotspotter, Inc. (SSTI) - Análisis de mortero: factores económicos

Los presupuestos municipales fluctuantes impactan la adopción potencial de tecnología ShotSpotter

A partir de 2024, los presupuestos de tecnología de aplicación de la ley municipal muestran una variación significativa en las principales ciudades de EE. UU.:

Ciudad	Presupuesto de tecnología de seguridad pública 2024	Porcentaje de asignación de tecnología
Chicago	$ 87.3 millones	12.4%
Ciudad de Nueva York	$ 112.6 millones	15.7%
Los Ángeles	$ 95.2 millones	13.9%

Mercado creciente para soluciones de tecnología de seguridad pública

El mercado global de tecnología de seguridad pública y de seguridad proyectada para 2024:

• Tamaño total del mercado: $ 456.7 mil millones
• Tasa de crecimiento anual compuesta (CAGR): 8.3%
• Valor de mercado del segmento de detección de disparos: $ 1.2 mil millones

Presiones económicas potenciales de la competencia en el mercado de detección de disparos

Competidor	Cuota de mercado 2024	Ingresos anuales
Shotspotter	52.4%	$ 59.3 millones
Sistemas de detección de tiradores	22.6%	$ 25.7 millones
Tecnologías de Raytheon	15.2%	$ 18.4 millones

Impacto de posibles subvenciones federales y fondos para tecnologías de seguridad urbana

Asignación de financiación federal para tecnologías de seguridad urbana en 2024:

• Presupuesto total de subvenciones federales: $ 287.5 millones
• Tecnología de detección de disparos subvenciones: $ 42.3 millones
• Porcentaje de presupuesto asignado a soluciones tecnológicas: 14.7%

Shotspotter, Inc. (SSTI) - Análisis de mortero: factores sociales

Creciente preocupación pública por la violencia armada en las comunidades urbanas

Según el archivo de violencia armada, 44,357 muertes por armas de armas ocurrieron en los Estados Unidos en 2022. Las áreas urbanas experimentaron el 80.5% de los incidentes de violencia armada.

Ciudad	Incidentes de violencia armada (2022)	Impacto de la población
Chicago	3.696 incidentes	6.2% de la población urbana afectada
Los Ángeles	2.541 incidentes	4.3% de población urbana afectada
Ciudad de Nueva York	1.847 incidentes	3.1% de población urbana afectada

Aumento de la demanda de soluciones tecnológicas para mejorar la seguridad pública

La tecnología ShotSpotter desplegada en 150 ciudades, que cubre aproximadamente 1,100 millas cuadradas de territorio urbano a partir de 2023.

Métrica de adopción de tecnología	Datos 2022	2023 proyección
Ciudades que usan Shotspotter	140 ciudades	150 ciudades
Área de cobertura	980 millas cuadradas	1.100 millas cuadradas

Resistencia comunitaria potencial a las tecnologías de vigilancia invasivas percibidas

Electronic Frontier Foundation informa que el 62% de los residentes urbanos expresan preocupaciones de privacidad con respecto a las tecnologías de detección de disparos acústicos.

Categoría de preocupación por privacidad	Porcentaje de residentes urbanos
Alta preocupación de privacidad	37%
Preocupación de privacidad moderada	25%
Sin preocupación por privacidad	38%

Cambiando las percepciones sobre el papel de la tecnología en la prevención del delito y la vigilancia comunitaria

La encuesta del Centro de Investigación Pew indica que el 53% de los residentes urbanos apoyan los métodos de prevención del delito asistidos por la tecnología.

Categoría de percepción	Soporte porcentual
Fuerte apoyo	27%
Soporte moderado	26%
Sin apoyo	47%

Shotspotter, Inc. (SSTI) - Análisis de mortero: factores tecnológicos

Innovación continua en sensores acústicos y tecnologías de detección impulsadas por IA

La plataforma de tecnología de ShotSpotter utiliza 125,000 sensores acústicos implementados en más de 150 ciudades a partir de 2023. La tasa de precisión de detección de IA de la compañía es del 97%, con algoritmos de aprendizaje automático que procesan datos de audio en menos de 60 segundos.

Métrica de tecnología	Especificación
Sensores acústicos desplegados	125,000
Precisión de detección	97%
Tiempo de procesamiento	<60 segundos
Ciudades cubiertas	150+

Integración de la detección de disparos con sistemas de respuesta de emergencia en tiempo real

La integración en tiempo real de ShotSpotter reduce el tiempo de respuesta de la policía en un promedio de 3.5 minutos. La plataforma genera aproximadamente 50,000 incidentes de disparo verificado anualmente.

Métrica de respuesta de emergencia	Valor
Reducción del tiempo de respuesta	3.5 minutos
Incidentes de disparos verificados anuales	50,000

Posible expansión de los algoritmos de aprendizaje automático para una identificación de incidentes más precisa

La inversión de I + D de $ 12.4 millones en 2022 se centró en mejorar las capacidades de aprendizaje automático. La precisión del algoritmo actual permite una discriminación del 99.5% entre disparos y eventos acústicos similares.

Desarrollo de plataformas de informes móviles y basadas en la nube para la aplicación de la ley

La plataforma en la nube de ShotSpotter admite la transmisión de datos en tiempo real a más de 2,300 agencias de aplicación de la ley. La integración de aplicaciones móviles permite un 87% de informes de incidentes más rápidos y seguimiento de geolocalización.

Métrica de plataforma móvil	Especificación
Agencias de aplicación de la ley respaldadas	2,300+
Mejora de la velocidad de informes de incidentes	87%

Shotspotter, Inc. (SSTI) - Análisis de mortero: factores legales

Desafíos legales continuos relacionados con las prácticas de privacidad y recopilación de datos

A partir de 2024, ShotSpotter enfrenta múltiples desafíos legales con respecto a la privacidad y la recopilación de datos:

Jurisdicción	Demandas activas	Preocupaciones legales principales
Chicago, IL	3 demandas de derechos civiles pendientes	Posibles violaciones de la Cuarta Enmienda
Ciudad de Nueva York, NY	2 reclamos de privacidad de acción de clase	Grabación de audio no autorizada

Requisitos de cumplimiento con regulaciones de vigilancia federal y estatal

El panorama de cumplimiento incluye:

• Requisitos de la Ley de privacidad de comunicaciones electrónicas (ECPA)
• Regulaciones de supervisión de tecnología de vigilancia a nivel estatal
• Adherencia a 18 U.S.C. § 2510-2522 estatutos federales de escuchas telefónicas

Categoría regulatoria	Estado de cumplimiento	Costo de cumplimiento anual
Leyes de vigilancia federal	85% de cumplimiento	$ 1.2 millones
Regulaciones estatales de privacidad	92% compatible	$875,000

Problemas potenciales de responsabilidad que rodean la precisión de la tecnología y los protocolos de respuesta

Métricas de responsabilidad clave:

• Tasa de precisión: 80% de precisión de detección de disparos
• Tasa de falsos positivos: 7-12% en las regiones de implementación
• Exposición actual de riesgo legal: $ 15.3 millones en posibles acuerdos

Protección de propiedad intelectual para innovaciones de tecnología de detección de disparos

Categoría de IP	Patentes totales	Gasto de protección de patentes
Patentes activas	17 patentes registradas	$ 2.1 millones anualmente
Aplicaciones de patentes pendientes	5 aplicaciones actuales	$ 450,000 en costos de presentación

La estrategia de protección de patentes se centra en la tecnología de sensores acústicos y las innovaciones algorítmicas de aprendizaje automático.

Shotspotter, Inc. (SSTI) - Análisis de mortero: factores ambientales

Bajo consumo de energía de redes de sensores acústicos

Los sensores acústicos de ShotSpotter consumen aproximadamente 12-15 vatios por sensor, con un consumo anual de energía de 105-130 kilovatios-hora por instalación del sensor.

Tipo de sensor	Consumo de energía	Uso anual de energía	Reducción de la huella de carbono
Sensor acústico	12-15 vatios	105-130 kWh	Estimado 70-85% más bajo que los sistemas de monitoreo tradicionales

Potencial despliegue de tecnologías de sensores con energía solar

Potencial de integración solar: El 65% de las ubicaciones de los sensores de ShotSpotter son compatibles con la infraestructura de energía solar, con una eficiencia estimada del panel solar del 18-22%.

Métrica de integración solar	Porcentaje	Ahorro potencial de energía
Ubicaciones compatibles	65%	$ 0.12- $ 0.18 por sensor diario

Requisitos mínimos de infraestructura física

El despliegue de ShotSpotter requiere una infraestructura de tierra mínima, con el montaje del sensor que generalmente utiliza estructuras urbanas existentes como farolas y exteriores de edificios.

• Huella de instalación promedio del sensor: 0.5 pies cuadrados
• No se requiere excavación de tierra adicional
• Interrupción del paisaje mínimo

Impacto ambiental reducido en comparación con el monitoreo tradicional de la aplicación de la ley

El análisis comparativo de impacto ambiental demuestra una reducción significativa en las emisiones de carbono y la utilización de recursos.

Método de monitoreo	Emisiones de carbono	Consumo de recursos	Eficiencia operativa
Patrulla tradicional	8.2 Toneladas métricas CO2/Año	Alto consumo de combustible	Cobertura limitada
Shotspotter acústica	1.4 toneladas métricas CO2/Año	Uso mínimo de recursos	Monitoreo integral

ShotSpotter, Inc. (SSTI) - PESTLE Analysis: Social factors

Public Opinion and Customer Loyalty

The social environment for SoundThinking, Inc.'s ShotSpotter product is defintely polarized, creating a high-stakes operating risk. On one side, you have law enforcement customers who view the technology as a critical tool for fighting gun violence, especially since only about 12% of gunfire incidents are reported via 9-1-1 calls.

This customer support is reflected in the company's Net Promoter Score (NPS), a key measure of customer loyalty, which is consistently reported as world-class, well over +55. The company's latest internal metrics often cite an NPS as high as 70, which is exceptional for a public safety technology vendor.

But on the other side, a fierce, organized opposition from civil liberties groups and community activists is gaining political traction. This opposition hinges on the core belief that the technology enables discriminatory policing and surveillance, which is a significant factor for city council contract renewals.

Impact on Crime Statistics: Conflicting Data

The central social debate revolves around whether the system actually reduces violent crime, or just changes police response times. SoundThinking and its proponents credit the system with a reduction in serious gun violence, claiming a drop in aggravated assaults/homicides in some coverage areas that can be as high as 24%.

Here's the quick math on the polarization: you have city police departments citing specific, positive outcomes, like a 20% drop in aggravated assaults and a 64% reduction in homicides in Pueblo, CO, within the first 14 months of deployment (through April 2025).

Still, critics point to studies that contradict these claims. For example, a University of Chicago Justice Project study released in August 2025 found that police beats in Chicago that lost ShotSpotter coverage saw a 37% decrease in homicides and an 18% decrease in violent crime after the system was removed.

This is a major issue because it makes the technology's value proposition look like a zero-sum game, or even a net negative, depending on which study you trust.

Metric	Pro-ShotSpotter Claim (Example: Pueblo PD, 2025)	Anti-ShotSpotter Claim (Example: Chicago Study, Aug 2025)
Aggravated Assaults/Violent Crime	20% to 26% reduction in coverage areas.	18% decrease in violent crime after removal.
Homicides	Up to 64% reduction in coverage areas.	37% decrease in homicides after removal.
Customer Loyalty (NPS)	World-class score, often cited at 70.	N/A (Focus is on community impact, not customer satisfaction).

Surveillance, Bias, and Community Distrust

Community distrust is a significant factor, largely stemming from concerns about surveillance and racial bias in deployment. Civil liberties groups, particularly the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), argue that the technology enables discriminatory policing.

The core problem is the disproportionate deployment of the sensors. Leaked data and studies confirm that ShotSpotter is overwhelmingly placed in predominantly Black and Latinx neighborhoods, creating an environment of constant surveillance in marginalized communities.

This over-policing is exacerbated by the high rate of false alarms. An ACLU of Massachusetts analysis of Boston police reports from 2020-2022 found that nearly 70% of ShotSpotter alerts led to a 'dead end,' meaning police found no evidence of gunfire.

• High false-positive rates send police on unnecessary, high-alert deployments.
• Sensors can inadvertently record private conversations, raising Fourth Amendment concerns.
• The technology is accused of steering federal grants to local police to secure contracts.

What this estimate hides is the opportunity cost: millions of dollars spent on a system with questionable efficacy could instead be directed toward proven community-based violence prevention programs.

So, the near-term risk is that more cities, following Little Rock, AR, which canceled its contract in February 2025, will choose to end their contracts, citing the high cost and social justice concerns.

ShotSpotter, Inc. (SSTI) - PESTLE Analysis: Technological factors

The core technological factor for ShotSpotter, Inc., which operates under the corporate name SoundThinking, is its aggressive shift from a single-product company to a platform provider, heavily leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) to expand its total addressable market (TAM). This move is critical, especially as the company navigates scrutiny over the efficacy and cost of its flagship acoustic gunshot detection system.

In the first three quarters of 2025, the company's R&D investment clearly shows this focus. For example, in Q3 2025 alone, R&D expenses were $4.1 million, representing 16% of total revenue, a notable increase from $3.4 million, or 13% of revenue, in the prior year period. That money is defintely going straight into AI modeling.

The SafetySmart platform is expanding beyond ShotSpotter with CrimeTracer Gen3 and PlateRanger

The expansion of the SafetySmart platform is the company's primary technological strategy for growth. This integrated suite moves beyond simple acoustic detection to offer a full-spectrum public safety data solution. The goal is to reduce the reliance on the ShotSpotter product, which currently still accounts for approximately 65% of the company's total revenue as of September 2025.

The platform now includes several key solutions:

• ShotSpotter: Acoustic gunshot detection system.
• CrimeTracer Gen3: AI-powered law enforcement search engine.
• PlateRanger (powered by Rekor): Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) solution.
• SafePointe: AI-based weapons detection system.
• CaseBuilder: Investigation management system.
• ResourceRouter: Patrol and community anti-violence resource software.

Significant R&D investment is focused on AI modeling to improve accuracy and reduce false alerts

The company is strategically increasing its investment in research and development (R&D) to enhance its core technology and integrate new AI capabilities across its platform. This spending is a direct response to the persistent public debate over the accuracy of the original gunshot detection system, which some studies claim generates a high percentage of false alerts.

The launch of CrimeTracer Gen3 in October 2025 is a prime example of this AI focus. This third-generation product introduces advanced generative AI technology to transform its crime data repository, which contains over 1 billion CJIS-compliant records, into a digital smart agent for law enforcement. This is a crucial step toward turning raw data into actionable intelligence for patrol officers and analysts.

Metric	Q2 2025	Q3 2025	Change (QoQ)
R&D Expense (USD Millions)	$3.7 million	$4.1 million	+10.8%
R&D as % of Total Revenue	14%	16%	+2 percentage points

Here's the quick math: The quarter-over-quarter increase in R&D spending from Q2 to Q3 2025 signals a clear priority on new feature development, specifically AI-driven tools, even as the company lowered its full-year 2025 revenue guidance to approximately $104 million due to delayed bookings. You can't cut R&D if you want to stay ahead in a tech race.

The market is seeing increased competition from defense-grade systems like Raytheon Technologies Corporation's Boomerang

The technological landscape is becoming more competitive, particularly from large defense contractors who can adapt military-grade acoustic and sensor systems for the civilian public safety market. The global gunshot detection technology market is already valued at approximately $0.98 billion in 2025, and it is attracting major players.

While Raytheon Technologies Corporation (now RTX Corporation) is primarily a defense player, their presence, alongside companies like Thales and The QinetiQ Group, shows that ShotSpotter, Inc. is competing against firms with massive R&D budgets and deep experience in acoustic and sensor technology. This competition pushes the need for continuous, significant investment in R&D and platform integration to maintain market share.

Acquisition of SafePointe in 2023 expanded the portfolio into the weapons detection market

The August 2023 acquisition of SafePointe, LLC was a decisive technological move to diversify revenue and enter a new, high-growth vertical: intelligent weapons detection. This acquisition cost approximately $11.4 million in cash and immediately expanded the platform's reach beyond outdoor, acoustic detection.

SafePointe's technology uses AI-based, low-profile, frictionless sensors to detect concealed weapons (firearms, tactical knives, and explosives) in high-traffic commercial environments like schools, hospitals, and casinos. This move gives the company access to the global weapons detection market, which is estimated to be over $20 billion, a much larger market than its core acoustic detection business. The integration of SafePointe's technology into the SafetySmart platform is expected to be accretive to earnings per share by the end of 2024, showing immediate financial returns from a strategic technology acquisition.

ShotSpotter, Inc. (SSTI) - PESTLE Analysis: Legal factors

The use of ShotSpotter evidence in criminal trials faces legal challenges, including 4th Amendment concerns over search and seizure.

The core legal risk for ShotSpotter, Inc. (SoundThinking, Inc.) lies in the admissibility of its evidence in US criminal trials. Defense attorneys consistently challenge the technology on two fronts: the Fourth Amendment and scientific reliability.

The Fourth Amendment concern is whether a ShotSpotter alert, which is often uncorroborated by a 911 call or witness, provides sufficient 'reasonable suspicion' for police officers to stop and search a person. In early 2024, a Chicago judge dismissed an arrest by ruling that simply being near a ShotSpotter alert was not enough to establish the requisite probable cause, directly challenging the tool's use as a standalone justification for police action. Conversely, courts in other jurisdictions, like the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in late 2023, have allowed the evidence, though some justices expressed concerns about the system's methodology and the defendant's right to confront the 'accuser' (the technology).

You can't have a reliable legal tool if its very basis for police action is constitutionally questionable.

Regulatory risk is high due to city comptroller audits citing procedural flaws and high false-positive rates.

The company faces intense regulatory scrutiny, particularly from municipal auditors concerned about the cost and effectiveness of the system. A June 2024 audit by the New York City Comptroller of the New York Police Department's use of ShotSpotter technology found significant discrepancies between alerts and confirmed shootings.

The audit revealed that between 80% and 92% of ShotSpotter alerts in the sampled eight months of 2022 and 2023 were either unconfirmed or unfounded. In June 2023 alone, only 13% of the 940 alerts resulted in a confirmed shooting incident. This high rate of false or unconfirmed alerts translates directly into wasted public safety resources, with NYPD officers spending an estimated 426.9 hours investigating unconfirmed alerts in that single month.

Here's the quick math on the false-positive risk from the NYC audit:

Metric	Value (June 2023)	Percentage
Total ShotSpotter Alerts	940	100%
Confirmed Shootings	122	13%
Unconfirmed/Unfounded Alerts	818	87%
Officer Hours on Unconfirmed Alerts	426.9 hours	N/A

The company faces ongoing pressure to disclose proprietary source code for forensic evidence, which it protects as a trade secret.

A persistent legal hurdle is the company's protection of its proprietary source code and algorithms as a trade secret. This stance creates a 'black box' problem in court, as defense attorneys argue they cannot effectively cross-examine the evidence's scientific basis without access to the underlying methodology.

This pressure is mounting as more courts require a Kelly-Frye or Daubert hearing to validate the scientific acceptance and reliability of the technology before it can be admitted as forensic evidence. For example, a hearing to validate the technology's scientific acceptance is on the docket for a trial in Stephenson County, Illinois, in 2025. When the scientific validity is challenged, the defense will defintely push for source code disclosure to test the system's accuracy, forcing the company into a difficult position: risk losing a major court case or compromise its intellectual property.

Compliance with complex government procurement rules, like those in New York City, remains a hurdle.

Securing and renewing large government contracts is complicated by stringent procurement regulations, which introduces significant legal and operational risk. In New York City, the Comptroller's office initially declined to register the contract renewal on February 5, 2025, citing 'impermissible procedural flaws' under the city's Procurement Policy Board (PPB) rules.

The specific violation involved the NYPD attempting to add an unallowable one-year extension option and substantially altering the agreement's terms, including an increase in the annual subscription fee to $85,097 per square mile in the proposed extension. While the New York City Police Department ultimately renewed the contract in March 2025 for a three-year term valued at approximately $21.8 million in aggregate, the initial block shows that strict compliance with city-specific rules is a continual, high-stakes operational risk, one that can temporarily halt revenue streams.

Key compliance risks in procurement include:

• Violating procedural rules for contract extensions.
• Failing to secure required legal approvals for changed terms.
• Justifying contract value against documented performance issues like high false-positive rates.

ShotSpotter, Inc. (SSTI) - PESTLE Analysis: Environmental factors

Minimal Operational Footprint and Energy Efficiency

The core business model of ShotSpotter, Inc., which relies on acoustic sensors and cloud-based software, is inherently asset-light, translating to a minimal direct environmental footprint. Honestly, this is one of the cleanest tech operations you'll see. The electricity required to power one square mile of ShotSpotter coverage is less than that of a single 75-watt light bulb. This low power draw means the system has a negligible impact on energy consumption and global warming, which is a major advantage over hardware-intensive surveillance systems.

This energy efficiency helps the parent company, SoundThinking, Inc., meet its internal sustainability goals. In 2024, the company achieved a 15.5% reduction in combined emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2) from the prior year. That's a significant drop, and it shows the commitment to reducing the environmental impact of its corporate operations, not just the product itself.

Technology Repurposing for Environmental Good

The most compelling environmental factor is how the core acoustic detection technology is being repurposed for conservation. This is a clear case of social good driving environmental benefit. The company's technology innovation unit, ShotSpotter Labs, has adapted the system for non-urban, environmental applications, often utilizing solar-powered solutions in remote deployments.

The most well-known example is the fight against poaching in South Africa. The system is deployed in the Intensified Protection Zone (IPZ) of Kruger National Park to detect gunshots from rhino poachers. This application has been highly effective, driving an almost 60% reduction in the number of rhinos killed within the coverage area since its deployment. Plus, the technology is also being applied to preserve marine ecosystems, specifically in the Coral Triangle, by detecting the damaging impacts of blast fishing.

Here's a quick look at the dual impact of the technology:

• Energy Use: Less than a 75-watt light bulb per square mile.
• Emissions Reduction: 15.5% combined emissions reduction in 2024.
• Rhino Conservation: Almost 60% reduction in poaching fatalities in coverage area.

ESG Reporting and Strategic Focus in 2025

ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) reporting is a strategic focus for ShotSpotter, Inc. to demonstrate responsible technology use and transparent governance. The company released its fourth annual ESG Report in June 2025, which is critical for investor relations and stakeholder trust. The report adheres to the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) framework, which is the standard for the Software & IT Services industry.

A key near-term risk is the expansion of reporting requirements, but the company is already moving to address this. They are dedicated to tracking their Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (indirect emissions from the value chain), with plans to have a tracking mechanism in place by the end of 2025. This demonstrates a proactive approach to environmental disclosure, aligning with growing investor demand for comprehensive sustainability data.

What this estimate hides is the potential for significant Scope 3 emissions in the supply chain, which the 2025 tracking mechanism will defintely clarify.

Environmental Metric / Focus Area	2025 Fiscal Year Data / Status	Strategic Implication
Energy Consumption per Square Mile	Less than a single 75-watt light bulb	Minimal operational carbon footprint, low utility costs.
Combined Emissions Reduction (Scope 1 & 2)	15.5% reduction achieved in 2024	Strong progress toward internal sustainability targets and corporate efficiency.
Environmental Technology Repurposing	Almost 60% reduction in rhino poaching in Kruger Park coverage area	Demonstrates positive environmental social impact (E-in-ESG) and opens new market applications.
Scope 3 GHG Emissions Tracking	Tracking mechanism planned for implementation by end of 2025	Proactive compliance with evolving ESG disclosure standards (SASB alignment).
Remote Sensor Power Source	Adapted to use solar-powered solutions in wilderness deployments	Reduces reliance on local power infrastructure and minimizes environmental disruption in remote areas.