Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) Porter's Five Forces Analysis

Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Coll): 5 Analyse des forces [Jan-2025 MISE À JOUR]

US | Healthcare | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | NASDAQ
Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) Porter's Five Forces Analysis

Entièrement Modifiable: Adapté À Vos Besoins Dans Excel Ou Sheets

Conception Professionnelle: Modèles Fiables Et Conformes Aux Normes Du Secteur

Pré-Construits Pour Une Utilisation Rapide Et Efficace

Compatible MAC/PC, entièrement débloqué

Aucune Expertise N'Est Requise; Facile À Suivre

Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$25 $15
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99

TOTAL:

Dans le paysage issu de l'innovation pharmaceutique, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) navigue dans un écosystème complexe où la survie dépend du positionnement stratégique et de la compréhension du marché nuancé. By dissecting Michael Porter's Five Forces Framework, we unveil the intricate dynamics shaping COLL's competitive strategy—from the delicate balance of supplier relationships to the relentless pressure of market competition, revealing how this specialized pain management pharmaceutical company maneuvers through challenging industry currents that can make or briser sa durabilité du marché et son potentiel de croissance.



Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Coll) - Five Forces de Porter: Pouvoir de négociation des fournisseurs

Nombre limité de fabricants d'ingrédients pharmaceutiques spécialisés

En 2024, le marché mondial de la fabrication d'ingrédients pharmaceutiques montre une concentration importante. Environ 80% des ingrédients pharmaceutiques actifs (API) sont produits par un nombre limité de fabricants, principalement situés en Chine et en Inde.

Région Part de marché de la fabrication de l'API Nombre de grands fabricants
Chine 44.3% 273
Inde 35.7% 241
États-Unis 12.5% 86

Coûts de commutation élevés pour changer les fournisseurs de matières premières

Le changement de fournisseurs d'ingrédients pharmaceutiques implique des dépenses financières et réglementaires substantielles. Le coût moyen de la qualification d'un nouveau fournisseur varie de 250 000 $ à 1,5 million de dollars.

  • Vérification de la conformité réglementaire: 350 000 $
  • Test d'assurance qualité: 275 000 $
  • Validation du processus de fabrication: 425 000 $
  • Intégration de la chaîne d'approvisionnement: 200 000 $

Exigences réglementaires complexes pour la chaîne d'approvisionnement pharmaceutique

La FDA nécessite une documentation approfondie pour les fournisseurs d'ingrédients pharmaceutiques. En 2023, 67% des sociétés pharmaceutiques ont déclaré avoir dépensé plus de 2,3 millions de dollars par an pour les processus de conformité et de vérification des fournisseurs.

Activité de conformité Coût annuel moyen
Audits des fournisseurs $875,000
Revue de documentation $650,000
Systèmes de gestion de la qualité $775,000

Dépendance à l'égard des fournisseurs spécifiques pour les ingrédients de substances contrôlées

Pour les ingrédients de substances contrôlées, Collegium Pharmaceutical fait face à des options de fournisseur limité. Environ 3 à 4 fabricants mondiaux se spécialisent dans la production d'API de substances contrôlées spécifiques.

  • Fabricants d'API enregistrés en désintégration: 12
  • Fabricants avec une expertise en substance contrôlée: 4
  • Délai de livraison moyen pour les ingrédients de substances contrôlées: 8-12 mois


Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Coll) - Five Forces de Porter: Pouvoir de négociation des clients

Provideurs de soins de santé et gestionnaires de négociation des gestionnaires de prestations de pharmacie

Depuis le quatrième trimestre 2023, les fournisseurs de soins de santé et les gestionnaires de prestations de pharmacie (PBMS) exercent un pouvoir de négociation substantiel sur le prix des produits et l'accès au marché de Collegium Pharmaceutical.

Part de marché PBM Impact sur la négociation
CVS Caremark (34%) Effet de levier à forte tarification
Scripts express (30%) Contrôle de formulaire significatif
Optumrx (25%) Faisons négociations basées sur le volume

Grandes compagnies d'assurance-prix influence

En 2023, les meilleures compagnies d'assurance ont démontré des capacités importantes de prix et de sélection des produits:

  • UnitedHealthCare: 70 millions de vies couvertes
  • Hymne: 47,7 millions de membres
  • Humana: 17 millions de membres

Pouvoir d'achat concentré sur le marché des médicaments de gestion de la douleur

Métriques de concentration du marché des médicaments contre la gestion de la douleur pour 2023:

Segment de marché Pourcentage de concentration
3 meilleurs acheteurs 62%
5 meilleurs acheteurs 78%

Prix ​​du médicament et sensibilité au taux de remboursement

Données de sensibilité au taux de remboursement pour les principaux produits clés de Collegium Pharmaceutical en 2023:

  • Élasticité du prix moyenne: -1,4
  • Impact de la réduction du remboursement de Medicaid: 15-20%
  • Potentiel de négociation Medicare: 3 $ à 5 $ par ordonnance


Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Coll) - Five Forces de Porter: rivalité compétitive

Concours intense du segment des médicaments de gestion de la douleur opioïde

Depuis le quatrième trimestre 2023, le marché des médicaments de gestion de la douleur opioïde démontre une intensité concurrentielle importante. Collegium Pharmaceutical fait face à la concurrence directe des acteurs clés suivants:

Concurrent Part de marché Produits clés de gestion de la douleur
Purdue Pharma 18.5% Oxycontin
Teva Pharmaceutical 15.3% Abstrral, Actiq
Insys Therapeutics 12.7% Subsature
Collegium Pharmaceutical 9.2% Xtampza er

Plusieurs sociétés pharmaceutiques établies ciblant des marchés similaires

L'analyse du paysage concurrentiel révèle:

  • 7 grandes sociétés pharmaceutiques en concurrence activement dans la gestion de la douleur opioïde
  • Évaluation totale du marché de 24,6 milliards de dollars en 2023
  • Taux de croissance annuel composé projeté (TCAC) de 3,8% à 2026

Batailles de brevet en cours et concours de médicaments génériques

Statut de brevet Nombre de cas de litige actif Dépenses juridiques estimées
Conflits de brevet en cours 12 4,3 millions de dollars
Défis de médicament génériques 5 2,1 millions de dollars

Innovation continue requise pour maintenir la position du marché

Métriques d'investissement de recherche et développement:

  • Dépenses de R&D en 2023: 48,7 millions de dollars
  • Nouvelles soumissions d'application de médicament: 3
  • Dossiers de brevet: 6 nouvelles entités moléculaires

Score d'intensité compétitif: 8,2 sur 10



Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Coll) - Five Forces de Porter: Menace de substituts

Traitements alternatifs de gestion de la douleur

Le marché mondial de la gestion de la douleur non opioïde était évalué à 71,5 milliards de dollars en 2022, avec un TCAC projeté de 6,3% de 2023 à 2030.

Catégorie de gestion de la douleur Taille du marché 2022 ($ b) Taux de croissance
Médicaments non opioïdes 38.2 5.7%
Physiothérapie 16.5 7.2%
Traitements alternatifs 16.8 6.9%

Approches de gestion de la douleur non pharmaceutique

La physiothérapie et les segments du marché du traitement alternatif démontrent un potentiel concurrentiel important.

  • Marché de l'acupuncture: 16,3 milliards de dollars en 2022
  • Marché des soins de chiropratique: 19,7 milliards de dollars en 2022
  • Marché de la massothérapie: 18,5 milliards de dollars en 2022

Paysage réglementaire

Les directives du CDC recommandent des traitements non opioïdes, 75% des prestataires de soins de santé se déplaçant vers des stratégies alternatives de gestion de la douleur.

Préférence réglementaire Pourcentage
Recommandations non opioïdes 75%
Règles de prescription d'opioïdes stricts 62%

Tendances d'adoption du marché

Les approches alternatives de gestion de la douleur montrent une préférence croissante des patients.

  • 41% des patients souffrant de douleur chronique utilisent des traitements non pharmaceutiques
  • 33% recherchent activement des méthodes de gestion de la douleur alternative
  • 26% combiner plusieurs approches de traitement


Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Coll) - Five Forces de Porter: Menace de nouveaux entrants

Obstacles réglementaires élevés pour le développement de médicaments pharmaceutiques

La FDA a approuvé 37 nouveaux médicaments en 2022, représentant une barrière d'entrée stricte pour les sociétés pharmaceutiques. Collegium Pharmaceutical opère sur un marché avec Exigences réglementaires complexes.

Métrique réglementaire Valeur
Temps de revue de la demande de médicament moyenne moyenne FDA 10,1 mois
Coût de la conformité réglementaire 161 millions de dollars par médicament
Taux de réussite de l'approbation des médicaments 12%

Exigences de capital significatives

La recherche et le développement de médicaments exige un investissement financier substantiel.

  • Coût moyen de R&D par nouvelle entité moléculaire: 2,6 milliards de dollars
  • Dépenses des essais cliniques: 19 millions de dollars à 300 millions de dollars
  • Investissement préclinique de recherche: 10 à 20 millions de dollars

Infrastructure de fabrication et de distribution

Composant d'infrastructure Coût estimé
Usine de fabrication pharmaceutique 200 millions de dollars - 500 millions de dollars
Systèmes de contrôle de la qualité 5 à 10 millions de dollars par an

Protection de la propriété intellectuelle

L'exclusivité des brevets offre une protection critique du marché.

  • Cycle de vie moyen des brevets: 20 ans
  • Valeur des brevets pharmaceutiques: 1 milliard de dollars par brevet

Normes de conformité et de sécurité

Les marchés de substances contrôlés nécessitent une conformité rigoureuse.

Métrique de conformité Valeur
Coûts d'audit de la conformité annuels 2 à 5 millions de dollars
Renouvellement de l'enregistrement de la DEA 3 000 $ par installation

Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) - Porter's Five Forces: Competitive rivalry

The competitive rivalry facing Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. is sharp, stemming from the high value and established nature of its core pain portfolio and the crowded, yet expanding, ADHD space where Jornay PM competes. You see, in specialty pharma, when you have a successful product line, rivals definitely take notice.

The pain portfolio remains the bedrock of Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.'s business, even as Jornay PM grows. For the third quarter of 2025, the pain portfolio generated record net revenue of $167.6 million, marking an 11% year-over-year increase. While the outline suggests this portfolio commands roughly half of the branded Extended-Release (ER) market, the actual revenue number shows it's a massive target for competitors looking to gain share in the overall pain relief medication market, which is expected to grow at a 5% CAGR from 2025 to 2031. This focus from rivals means Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. must constantly defend its turf through lifecycle management and maintaining strong physician relationships.

Direct competition is not abstract; it comes from established, diversified players. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, for instance, reported Q1 2025 net revenue of $695 million, and ANI Pharmaceuticals has a trailing twelve months (TTM) revenue of $0.82 Billion USD as of November 2025. These companies are not just small players; they have significant scale and are actively growing their branded segments, putting pressure on Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.'s established products. It's a battle of resources and market presence.

The rivalry intensifies in the ADHD market with Jornay PM. While Jornay PM is showing strong momentum, delivering $41.8 million in net revenue in Q3 2025, the market itself is large and crowded. The U.S. ADHD market size was estimated at $10.31 Billion USD in 2024, with the stimulants segment holding 69.3% of that share. Although Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. projects Jornay PM could eventually capture 15-20% of the stimulant market over five years, it is fighting against established brands in a space where physician familiarity and payer coverage are key hurdles.

To fight this rivalry, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. is making substantial investments in its commercial infrastructure. This is where you see the dollars being deployed to protect and grow market share, defintely.

Competitor Latest Reported Revenue Figure (Approximate) Key Growth/Focus Area Mentioned
Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Q3 2025) $209.4 million (Quarterly Net Revenue) Jornay PM projected to hit $145M - $150M in 2025
Amneal Pharmaceuticals (Q1 2025) $695 million (Quarterly Net Revenue) Specialty segment growth via CREXONT® and biosimilars
ANI Pharmaceuticals (TTM as of Nov 2025) $0.82 Billion USD (TTM Revenue) Strong growth in Rare Disease, particularly Cortrophin Gel

The commitment to defending and expanding share is evident in the operational spending and team size.

  • The ADHD sales force for Jornay PM was recently expanded to approximately ~180 sales reps deployed to cover the full market opportunity.
  • Total GAAP operating expenses for Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. in Q3 2025 were $67.1 million.
  • The company raised its full-year 2025 revenue guidance to $775M - $785M, signaling confidence that these investments will yield returns against rivals.

Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of substitutes

You're looking at the competitive landscape for Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) as we move through late 2025, and the threat from substitutes is definitely a major factor, especially in the pain management space. The pipeline of non-opioid alternatives is growing, which directly challenges the market position of your core opioid products like Belbuca and Xtampza ER.

The most immediate, high-profile substitute is Journavx (suzetrigine), approved by the FDA in January 2025. This drug, from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, is a non-opioid, oral pain signal inhibitor, representing the first new class of pain medication in over 20 years. While Journavx is currently indicated for moderate-to-severe acute pain, its non-addictive profile and novel mechanism create significant market noise and physician awareness that can bleed into chronic pain prescribing habits. Its list price is reported at $15.50 per 50mg pill, and sales are projected to hit $2.9 billion by 2030. This launch signals a clear, well-funded push away from the opioid class that Collegium champions.

Public health policy and physician preference are strongly aligned against opioids, which naturally elevates the perceived value of any non-opioid substitute. This environment favors alternatives for chronic pain management, even if Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. has differentiated its offerings. The pressure is systemic, not just product-specific. Here are some of the policy and preference drivers we see:

  • Public health campaigns emphasize reducing opioid exposure.
  • Physician prescribing habits are shifting toward non-narcotic options.
  • Regulatory bodies scrutinize long-acting opioid use more closely.
  • New non-opioid mechanisms, like Journavx, gain rapid attention.

Cheaper, established substitutes remain a constant headwind. Generic opioids and even over-the-counter (OTC) pain relievers present a low-cost barrier for patients who do not require the specific, differentiated profile of Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.'s products. This is evident in the generic market itself; for instance, year-over-year generic oral solid deflation was reported at 12.1% as of March 2025. Furthermore, the loss of exclusivity for parts of the Nucynta franchise-Nucynta ER facing potential generic entry by December 27, 2025, and Nucynta IR by January 3, 2027-demonstrates the immediate financial impact of generic substitution on Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.'s own portfolio.

To be fair, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.'s differentiated products are showing resilience. Belbuca net revenue grew 10% year-over-year to $58.3 million in Q3 2025, and Xtampza ER grew 2% year-over-year to $50.5 million in the same quarter, indicating that their specific abuse-deterrent and extended-release properties are convincing some prescribers to stick with them over other opioids. However, the switching costs for patients moving from one prescription pain reliever to another-especially between branded opioids or to a new non-opioid-are generally low. If a payer or physician decides a substitute is 'adequate,' the patient can often switch easily, eroding the value of the differentiation.

Here's a quick look at how the pain portfolio stacks up against the substitute landscape as of the latest reporting:

Metric Collegium Pain Portfolio (Q3 2025) Journavx (Substitute - Acute Pain) Generic Opioids (Market Trend)
Net Revenue (Q3 2025) $167.6 million (Up 11% YoY) Not applicable (New launch, Q3 data not available) N/A (Cost pressure shown by deflation)
Belbuca Net Revenue (Q3 2025) $58.3 million (Up 10% YoY) N/A N/A
Xtampza ER Net Revenue (Q3 2025) $50.5 million (Up 2% YoY) N/A N/A
Nucynta Franchise Net Revenue (Q3 2025) $54.8 million (Up 21% YoY) N/A Facing LOE/Generic Pressure (ER by end of 2025)
Indication Focus Severe/Persistent Pain (Extended Treatment) Moderate-to-Severe Acute Pain Various (Cheaper alternatives exist)
Reported Price Point Branded/Premium Pricing $15.50 per 50mg pill (List Price) Generic Oral Solid Deflation: 12.1% (Y/Y as of March 2025)

The overall threat is high because the market is actively seeking alternatives, and the cost of switching for the patient is minimal. Finance: draft 13-week cash view by Friday.

Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (COLL) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of new entrants

The threat of new entrants for Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. is generally considered moderate to high, depending on the specific product class, but the initial capital and regulatory hurdles act as significant deterrents for novel, non-generic competition.

High Regulatory Hurdles and Clinical Trial Costs

Entering the branded pharmaceutical space requires navigating the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval process, which demands substantial upfront investment in clinical trials and subsequent filing fees. For a new product seeking market entry, the cost of a New Drug Application (NDA) submission involving clinical data for Fiscal Year 2025 (running from October 1, 2024, to September 30, 2025) is set at $4,310,002. Furthermore, the ongoing cost of maintaining compliance, such as the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) Program Fee for FY2025, is $403,889 per product. The FDA's goal for acting on most original NDAs is within six or ten months of the submission date, but this timeline does not account for the years of pre-submission clinical development required. To put this barrier in perspective, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. exited the third quarter of 2025 with cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities totaling $285.9 million, a figure representing the scale of capital needed to even attempt a new drug launch.

Here are the relevant FDA user fees for human prescription drugs in FY2025:

Fee Type Amount (USD)
New Drug Application (NDA) with clinical data $4,310,002
New Drug Application (NDA) without clinical data $2,155,001
Prescription Drug Program Fee (per product) $403,889

Specialized Manufacturing for Abuse-Deterrent Formulations

Developing and manufacturing products with Abuse-Deterrent Formulations (ADFs), a key area for Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.'s pain portfolio products like Xtampza ER, requires specialized technology and capital investment to meet stringent FDA guidelines. The market for ADF Technologies itself is projected to reach an estimated USD 15,000 million by 2025, indicating significant underlying investment in the sector. New entrants must replicate or develop proprietary barrier technologies, such as the DETERx technology used in Xtampza ER. The premium associated with these specialized products is clear: the total cost of currently approved ADF opioid analgesics is noted to be over 4 times greater than that of generic non-ADF opioid analgesics. This high cost structure for development and manufacturing acts as a substantial barrier to entry for smaller, unestablished firms.

Impending Loss of Exclusivity for the Nucynta Franchise

While the overall threat from new drug development is high, the barrier for generic entry into the Nucynta franchise is actively diminishing due to patent and exclusivity expirations. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. received a pediatric exclusivity extension that sets the final expiration dates:

  • Nucynta ER exclusivity expires on December 27, 2025.
  • Nucynta exclusivity expires on January 3, 2027.

This impending loss of market protection for Nucynta means the barrier to entry for generic competitors is dropping sharply, with the generic launch date estimated around Jan 03, 2027. To further signal this reduced barrier, there are already three tentative approvals for the generic version (tapentadol hydrochloride). Generic alternatives typically sell at discounts of 80-85% compared to brand-name equivalents.

Established Distribution Channels and Payer Contracts

A significant, non-replicable barrier for any new entrant is the established commercial infrastructure Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. has built. This includes securing favorable third-party payor contracts and maintaining relationships with major distributors.

  • A significant percentage of Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.'s product shipments go to just three wholesale pharmaceutical distributors.
  • Losing any of these key distributors or experiencing a disruption to the transportation infrastructure could materially affect operations.
  • Securing favorable payor contracts is explicitly listed as a key factor for commercial success, meaning new firms face the difficult task of negotiating formulary placement against incumbents.

It takes time and significant sales force investment to build this level of market access, which is a major hurdle for any firm starting from scratch.


Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.