|
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE): PESTLE Analysis [Nov-2025 Updated] |
Fully Editable: Tailor To Your Needs In Excel Or Sheets
Professional Design: Trusted, Industry-Standard Templates
Investor-Approved Valuation Models
MAC/PC Compatible, Fully Unlocked
No Expertise Is Needed; Easy To Follow
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) Bundle
You're watching Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) and wondering if the macro-environment will help or hurt its bottom line. Honestly, the 2025 picture is a tightrope walk: the company is targeting a strong 30.0 million ounces of silver equivalent production, but that margin is constantly squeezed by high inflation pushing up All-in Sustaining Costs (AISC) and the persistent risk of resource nationalism in Mexico. This PESTLE breakdown cuts through the noise to show you exactly where CDE's biggest political, economic, and technological levers are, so you can map the near-term risks to clear, actionable decisions.
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) - PESTLE Analysis: Political factors
The political landscape for Coeur Mining, Inc. in 2025 is defined by a clear risk-reward trade-off: higher geopolitical risk in Latin America versus a push for domestic mineral security in the US, all complicated by cross-border trade friction. Your primary concern should be the immediate, quantifiable impact of new tax proposals in Mexico, which directly threaten the margin stability of two key assets.
Resource nationalism risk in Mexico, impacting concession stability.
Resource nationalism (a government asserting control over natural resources) remains the most tangible political risk to Coeur Mining's Mexican operations, Palmarejo and Las Chispas. The risk is not outright expropriation but rather a creeping fiscal burden and regulatory tightening that erodes project economics. This trend is defintely not abating under the new administration.
The most concrete manifestation of this is the Mexican government's proposal in the 2025 federal budget bill to increase two key mining duties. This move, justified by record metal prices, directly targets the profitability of foreign-owned mines like Coeur's.
Here's the quick math on the proposed tax hike:
| Mining Duty Category | Current Rate (Pre-2025 Proposal) | Proposed Rate (2025 Federal Bill) | Increase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Special Mining Tax (on net profits) | 7.5% | 8.5% | 1.0 percentage point |
| Extraordinary Tax (on gold/silver revenue) | 0.5% | 1.0% | 0.5 percentage point |
For a company like Coeur, whose Las Chispas operation generated an impressive $66 million in free cash flow in Q3 2025 alone, this increase in the extraordinary tax on silver and gold revenue from 0.5% to 1.0% is a direct hit to the top line. Beyond taxes, the broader resource nationalism project includes stricter water-use permits and reduced concession terms, which creates significant long-term operational uncertainty.
US-Canada trade relations influencing cross-border mining logistics.
The trade relationship between the US and Canada, while historically stable, saw significant political friction in early 2025 that complicates logistics and capital planning for Coeur's North American footprint (Kensington in Alaska, Rochester in Nevada, Wharf in South Dakota, and Silvertip in British Columbia). The US administration's imposition of a 25% tariff on all Canadian imports and a 10% tariff on critical minerals in Q1 2025, even with a temporary halt, signaled a profound shift toward nationalism.
This political uncertainty translates directly into higher costs for Coeur's Canadian exploration and development work at the Silvertip polymetallic project in British Columbia. Trade uncertainty has increased capital costs for Canadian junior mining companies by 12.7% compared to US counterparts. For a company that is accelerating investment at Silvertip as a key deliverable for 2025, these tariffs increase development costs for cross-border projects by an estimated 12% to 17%.
- Tariffs raise the cost of Canadian-sourced inputs for US mines.
- Logistical risk premiums increase for cross-border transport.
- Trade uncertainty adds a 300-500 basis point risk premium to projects spanning the border.
Shifting permitting timelines from US federal and state agencies.
The political push for domestic critical mineral production in the US creates a two-speed permitting system. On one hand, the average time to obtain a federal permit for a mine remains a staggering seven to ten years, with the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process alone averaging 4.5 years. This is a structural drag on new project development, a massive barrier to entry.
However, the March 2025 Executive Order on Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production directly aims to expedite this process. This order, along with the FAST-41 program, has led to 28 critical mineral projects being flagged for expedited review by June 2025. The Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 also mandates that federal agencies complete an EIS within a maximum of two years. This political intervention creates an opportunity for Coeur to accelerate any future expansion or new project permitting at its US mines (Rochester, Kensington, Wharf) by leveraging the new, streamlined FAST-41 process, provided the projects are deemed critical to national security. Coeur is already investing heavily, with full-year 2025 capital expenditures guided between $187 million and $225 million, a portion of which is dependent on timely permitting for infrastructure improvements.
Potential for increased royalties or taxes on mining profits in host countries.
The risk of increased fiscal take is a global phenomenon, but it is acutely focused on Coeur's two primary jurisdictions: Mexico and the US. In 2025, Coeur is already on track to pay substantial taxes, with year-to-date cash income and mining taxes totaling $137 million through Q3. This figure is set to rise due to the proposed Mexican tax changes and the company's strong financial performance, with full-year 2025 adjusted EBITDA expected to exceed $1 billion.
The political pressure to increase mining's fiscal contribution is driven by high metal prices-gold averaged $3,148 per ounce and silver averaged $38.93 per ounce in Q3 2025-which governments view as an opportunity to capture a larger share of the resource rent. The table above details the Mexican proposal, but similar pressures exist in US states and Canadian provinces where Coeur operates, as local governments also look to fill budget holes. The core risk is that these tax changes are often implemented without the stability guarantees that underpin long-term mine investment decisions.
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) - PESTLE Analysis: Economic factors
The economic landscape for Coeur Mining, Inc. in 2025 is defined by a high-volatility metals market and persistent inflationary pressures on the cost side. You're seeing a classic margin squeeze scenario, but the recent surge in gold and silver prices is currently overpowering the cost headwinds, leading to record financial performance.
Gold and silver price volatility driven by US Federal Reserve interest rate policy
The primary economic driver for Coeur Mining, Inc. is the extreme price volatility of gold and silver, which is directly tied to the U.S. Federal Reserve's (the Fed) interest rate policy. In late 2025, the market is grappling with a divided Fed, which has introduced significant short-term uncertainty. The Fed has executed two quarter-point rate cuts in September and October, bringing the federal funds rate to a target range of 3.75%-4.00%.
These initial cuts were a major catalyst for the recent precious metals rally, as lower rates reduce the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like gold and silver. However, a prevailing 'higher-for-longer' interest rate narrative is still causing sharp price swings. Gold (XAU) reached an all-time high of approximately $4,381.58 per ounce in October 2025, and silver (XAG) hit an unprecedented peak of $54.42 per ounce in mid-November 2025. This volatility is the single biggest risk and opportunity for Coeur Mining, Inc.'s quarterly revenue.
| Metric | Q3 2025 Value | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Average Realized Gold Price | $3,148 per ounce | Represents a significant year-over-year increase, driving record revenue. |
| Average Realized Silver Price | $38.93 per ounce | Strong price environment supports high-volume operations like Rochester. |
| Federal Funds Target Rate Range | 3.75%-4.00% | Monetary policy benchmark influencing the opportunity cost of holding metals. |
High inflation, particularly in consumables and labor, pressuring All-in Sustaining Costs (AISC)
High inflation is a structural headwind for all miners, putting upward pressure on All-in Sustaining Costs (AISC), which is the true cost of production. The global gold mining industry is facing a projected AISC increase of around 8% in 2025. This is driven by rising energy costs, equipment prices, and labor expenses across the board. For Coeur Mining, Inc., managing these input costs is defintely critical to maintaining its robust margins.
Here's the quick math on the cost pressure: While the industry average AISC for major producers rose by approximately 9.2% year-over-year in Q1 2025, Coeur Mining, Inc. has shown some success in cost control, particularly at its large-scale operations. For example, the cost of materials, parts, and supplies per ore ton mined actually decreased to $4.06 in the third quarter of 2025, down from $4.56 in Q3 2023. Still, labor costs have seen a modest increase, a common issue in the tight North American mining labor market.
Analyst projection for 2025 silver equivalent production near 30.0 million ounces
Coeur Mining, Inc.'s production profile has been significantly transformed by the Rochester expansion and the Las Chispas integration. The company's latest revised 2025 production guidance is for 415,250 ounces of gold and 18.1 million ounces of silver. While some analyst models might project a silver equivalent production near 30.0 million ounces, this figure is highly sensitive to the gold-to-silver price ratio used in the calculation.
Using the company's strong average realized prices from Q3 2025, where the gold-to-silver ratio was approximately 80.86:1 ($3,148 / $38.93), the current silver equivalent (AgEq) is substantially higher than the 30.0 million ounce mark. This indicates that the required production target is achievable and likely to be exceeded under the current high-price environment. What this estimate hides is the potential for a much higher AgEq if the favorable price ratio holds.
- Revised 2025 Gold Production Guidance: 415,250 ounces
- Revised 2025 Silver Production Guidance: 18.1 million ounces
- Analyst Projection for AgEq: Near 30.0 million ounces
Strong US dollar still makes international operating costs cheaper
The relative strength of the U.S. dollar (USD) in 2025 provides a tangible economic benefit to Coeur Mining, Inc. because a portion of its operating costs are incurred in foreign currencies, primarily the Mexican Peso (for Palmarejo) and the Canadian Dollar (for Silvertip). When the USD is strong, it takes fewer dollars to cover those local currency expenses, effectively lowering the company's operating costs when translated back to USD for financial reporting.
This currency dynamic helps offset some of the domestic inflationary pressures seen in the U.S. operations (Rochester and Wharf). The strong dollar acts as a natural hedge against rising input costs in its international mines, contributing to the company's solid cost performance reported in Q3 2025. Conversely, a weakening dollar would increase the reported costs from its foreign operations.
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) - PESTLE Analysis: Social factors
Growing investor focus on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance.
You can defintely see how Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors have moved from a compliance checklist to a core investment screen for major institutional investors. For Coeur Mining, this translates directly into capital access and cost. The company currently holds an MSCI ESG Rating of A, which is a strong signal to the market that their practices are better than average for the sector.
This focus is now deeply embedded in the corporate structure. For instance, the 2025 Proxy Statement confirms that maintaining strong ESG performance is a key part of the Board's oversight, helping to mitigate non-financial risks. This isn't just about optics; it's about financial resilience. The ongoing pressure means Coeur Mining must continuously improve its social metrics to maintain this rating and, crucially, to attract the growing pool of ESG-mandated capital.
- Maintain MSCI ESG Rating of A to attract capital.
- Integrate ESG into executive compensation metrics.
- Report social performance transparently to stakeholders.
Need for robust community relations to ensure social license to operate (SLO).
A Social License to Operate (SLO) is the ongoing acceptance of a company's operations by the local community and stakeholders. For a miner like Coeur Mining, which operates in sensitive areas like Alaska (Kensington mine) and Nevada (Rochester mine), losing the SLO can halt production overnight, costing millions. The recent $7 billion acquisition of New Gold, announced in November 2025, significantly expands Coeur Mining's footprint and complexity, making multi-jurisdictional stakeholder management a critical risk.
To manage this, the company has a dedicated community relations lead at each site and a formal Community Grievance Policy. A concrete example of their commitment in the 2025 fiscal year is the $1.5 million investment in sustainable water infrastructure at the newly acquired Las Chispas mine in Sonora, Mexico. This kind of tangible, shared-value investment is the only way to build the trust needed for long-term operational stability. You have to invest in the community to secure your future cash flow.
Competition for skilled labor in North American mining regions, driving up wages.
The North American mining sector is grappling with a severe talent crunch, and Coeur Mining is right in the middle of it. The primary driver is an aging workforce, with over half of the current U.S. mining workforce (about 221,000 workers) expected to retire by 2029. This creates intense wage inflation and recruitment challenges, especially in remote regions like Alaska and Nevada where Coeur Mining operates. Specialized mining roles can take up to 62 days to fill, which directly impacts operational efficiency and project timelines.
Here's the quick math on the pressure: general industrial wages have jumped 18% over the last three years due to this competition. To attract and keep the right talent, Coeur Mining must offer highly competitive packages. Skilled and specialized roles in their operating regions now command salaries in the $70,000 to $90,000 range, with technical and management positions easily exceeding $110,000 annually in 2025.
| Labor Challenge Metric (2025) | Value/Impact | Significance for Coeur Mining |
|---|---|---|
| Projected U.S. Skilled Labor Shortage (5 years) | 27,000 workers | Increases time-to-hire and reliance on contractors. |
| Average Time to Fill Specialized Mining Roles | Up to 62 days | Directly impacts productivity and project ramp-ups. |
| Skilled Role Salary Range (U.S.) | $70,000 - $90,000 annually | Drives up Costs Applicable to Sales (CAS). |
Safety culture improvements are defintely a continuous operational priority.
Safety is non-negotiable in mining, and for Coeur Mining, it's a competitive advantage they've been able to monetize in their public reporting. A strong safety record reduces insurance costs, minimizes operational downtime from incidents, and improves employee retention-all of which feed directly into better financial performance. The company has maintained its industry leadership in employee safety, achieving the lowest employee total reportable injury frequency rate (TRIFR) among its U.S. peers for the third year in a row.
This achievement comes from a focus on leading indicators-proactive measures rather than just reacting to incidents-to reduce long-term risk and repeated exposure. This consistent, top-tier safety performance is a key social factor that supports their SLO and helps them in the fierce competition for skilled labor, as people prefer to work for a demonstrably safer company. It's a virtuous cycle: better safety, better reputation, better talent pool.
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) - PESTLE Analysis: Technological factors
Use of data analytics to optimize ore body modeling and mine planning
The core of modern mining is turning geological data into profitable reserves, and for Coeur Mining, Inc., this means a heavy reliance on advanced data analytics for ore body modeling. This isn't just about drawing lines on a map; it's about using sophisticated software to process seismic, drilling, and assay data to pinpoint high-grade zones more accurately, which directly extends mine life and justifies large-scale capital projects.
The company's commitment to this is clear in its exploration spending, which is the primary budget for these technologies. In the third quarter of 2025 alone, Coeur invested approximately $30 million in exploration, with $5 million of that being capitalized-meaning it's treated as a long-term asset, not just an immediate expense. This investment is part of a broader strategy to expand the reserve base, which is a high-return organic growth priority in the company's capital allocation framework. The quick math shows that better modeling ensures every dollar spent on drilling is defintely working harder.
Increased investment in automation and remote operation at key sites like Rochester
Automation is the key to unlocking the massive scale at Coeur's flagship operations, especially the expanded Rochester silver-gold mine in Nevada. The sheer volume of material processed there demands it. The crushing circuit at Rochester is designed to reach a full capacity of 88,000 tonnes per day, or approximately 32 million tonnes per year. Managing this throughput efficiently requires a high degree of automation in the crushing, conveying, and stacking systems to minimize human error and maximize uptime.
The success of this technological integration is visible in the operational results. The Rochester mine achieved a 24% quarter-over-quarter increase in crushed ore tons in the second quarter of 2025, a clear sign the automated systems are ramping up effectively. Furthermore, the recent $7 billion acquisition of New Gold is expected to accelerate the integration of advanced automation and digital technologies across the now-expanded seven-operation portfolio, creating a more resilient and lower-cost combined entity.
Digitalization of supply chain to reduce inventory costs and improve efficiency
Digitalization extends beyond the pit and into the back office, specifically targeting the supply chain (SCM). For a multi-jurisdiction miner like Coeur, digitizing the SCM is a non-negotiable step to reduce working capital tied up in inventory and to improve procurement efficiency across its U.S., Canadian, and Mexican operations. This focus is part of the broader 'digital and business transformation' mentioned in their strategic priorities.
A digitized supply chain achieves several critical near-term actions:
- Optimize inventory levels for critical spare parts.
- Automate purchase order processing, cutting lead times.
- Improve forecasting for consumables like reagents and fuel.
While a specific dollar figure for supply chain savings is not public, the overall operational improvements and solid cost management led to a strong Q3 2025 performance, with adjusted costs applicable to sales per ounce for gold at $1,215 and silver at $14.95. These cost figures are a direct reflection of a more efficient, digitally-enabled operational backbone.
Implementing predictive maintenance to minimize unplanned downtime
Unplanned downtime is a killer of mining margins, especially at high-volume operations like Rochester. Coeur is moving from reactive or scheduled maintenance to predictive maintenance (PdM) using sensors and data analysis on critical equipment like crushers, mills, and haul trucks. This technology predicts equipment failure before it happens, allowing maintenance to be scheduled precisely when needed, but not sooner.
The financial impact of this operational discipline is substantial and is a key driver behind the company's record-setting 2025 financial guidance. The expected full-year 2025 adjusted EBITDA is projected to exceed $1 billion, with free cash flow expected to top $550 million. This kind of margin expansion is impossible without maximizing uptime, which is the core benefit of a successful PdM program. Here's how the technology translates into financial performance:
| Technological Factor | Operational Metric (Q3 2025) | Financial Impact (2025 Full-Year Guidance) |
|---|---|---|
| Data Analytics (Exploration) | $30 million exploration investment | Extends mine life, justifying long-term capital. |
| Automation (Rochester) | Crushing throughput up 24% Q-o-Q | Drives production volume and lowers unit costs. |
| Predictive Maintenance (PdM) | Strong execution and operating discipline | Contributes to Adjusted EBITDA exceeding $1 billion |
The lesson here is simple: you pay for the sensors now, or you pay for a massive, unscheduled repair later.
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) - PESTLE Analysis: Legal factors
Strict compliance with US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) regulations.
As a US-based, publicly traded company, Coeur Mining, Inc. operates under the most stringent financial and corporate governance regulations globally. This isn't optional; it's the cost of access to US capital markets. The company is classified as a large accelerated filer by the SEC, meaning it must adhere to the fastest reporting deadlines.
Compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) requires a rigorous system of internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR). The Audit Committee's role is critical here, reviewing compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, specifically focusing on internal controls, accounting, and contingent liabilities. To be fair, this is a baseline for any major US-listed miner, but maintaining a clean record is a constant, high-stakes legal priority.
The company confirmed in its 2024 filings that its principal executive and financial officers have made all required SOX certifications, and there has been no significant deficiency or material weakness identified in the design or operation of its internal controls as of late 2024. That's a clean bill of health.
Complex and lengthy permitting processes for mine expansions in the US.
The biggest legal hurdle for growth in the US remains the permitting gauntlet. While Coeur Mining's domestic operations-like the Rochester silver-gold mine in Nevada and the Kensington gold mine in Alaska-are mature, any significant expansion or new project faces a protracted regulatory timeline.
The average time for a mining project in the United States to receive federal approval, which typically involves a comprehensive Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), is an estimated eight to nine years. This is a massive time sink compared to the roughly two years often seen in jurisdictions like Canada or Australia.
The legal landscape is also volatile. The Trump administration's executive order in March 2025 aimed to fast-track permits for critical minerals, which could theoretically compress the typical 7-10 year timeline. However, this creates a dynamic environment where expedited permits are often challenged by litigation from environmental and local groups, leading to further delays. So, the risk isn't just the time; it's the high probability of a lawsuit (litigation exposure) that follows the permit approval.
Adherence to evolving labor laws in Mexico and Canada.
Coeur Mining's significant operations in Mexico (Las Chispas and Palmarejo) and its growing presence in Canada (Silvertip project and the announced New Gold acquisition) mandate continuous adaptation to rapidly shifting labor laws in both countries. This isn't just about wages; it's about fundamental working conditions and employee rights.
In Mexico, the focus is on worker well-being and reduced hours. The most impactful change is the proposed reform to reduce the maximum workweek from 48 hours to 40 hours, to be phased in starting in 2026 and completed by 2029-2030. This will necessitate a complete overhaul of shift rotations, which is a major operational and legal challenge for 24/7 mine sites.
A more immediate 2025 requirement is the 'Chair Law' (Ley Silla), which took effect on June 17, 2025, requiring employers to provide seats or chairs with backrests for rest breaks. The company's internal labor regulations must be updated to reflect this by December 14, 2025.
In Canada, the legal environment is focused on equity and access. The International Credentials Recognition Act in British Columbia, effective July 1, 2025, prohibits employers from requiring 'Canadian experience' in job postings, which helps Coeur tap into a wider global talent pool but requires immediate HR policy changes. Furthermore, the expansion of pay transparency laws in British Columbia means employers with 300 or more employees must comply with mandatory pay transparency reporting by November 1, 2025.
New environmental liability standards requiring higher financial assurance.
The legal mandate for environmental cleanup and mine closure is getting more demanding, translating directly into higher financial assurance (reclamation bonds) requirements. This is a material financial liability, formally tracked as the Asset Retirement Obligation (ARO) on the balance sheet.
The addition of the Las Chispas mine in February 2025 immediately increased the company's total ARO, as the purchase price allocation included an estimate for its reclamation and mine closure costs. In Mexico, amendments to the Mining Law now explicitly require mining companies to provide financial guarantees (like deposits or trusts) to support mitigation and compensation measures, formalizing the financial assurance requirement.
Here's the quick math on the expense associated with this liability for 2025: the Asset Retirement Obligation accretion expense, which is the non-cash charge representing the increase in the ARO liability due to the passage of time, totaled approximately $18.935 million for the last twelve months ending Q3 2025. This accretion expense is a clear financial measure of the legal obligation's impact on the income statement.
The company must also comply with the Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM), a non-governmental but increasingly de facto legal standard, with Coeur completing 20% of the outstanding implementation tasks across all sites in 2024.
Here is a summary of the key 2025 legal compliance deadlines and financial impacts:
| Legal/Regulatory Factor | Jurisdiction | 2025 Financial/Operational Impact | Compliance Deadline / Effective Date |
| US Mine Permitting (Average) | United States | Average approval time is 8-9 years for major projects. | N/A (Long-term systemic risk, subject to March 2025 Executive Order) |
| Asset Retirement Obligation (ARO) Accretion Expense | Global Operations | Accretion expense for LTM Q3 2025 was approximately $18.935 million. | Ongoing (Quarterly expense) |
| Mandatory Rest/Seating (Ley Silla) | Mexico | Requires capital expenditure for seating/rest areas; compliance risk. | Effective: June 17, 2025. Internal Regulation Amendment Deadline: December 14, 2025. |
| Pay Transparency Reporting | British Columbia, Canada | Requires new HR/Finance reporting infrastructure for companies with 300+ employees. | Compliance Deadline: November 1, 2025. |
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) - PESTLE Analysis: Environmental factors
You're operating in a sector where environmental compliance is no longer a cost center; it's a core component of your social license to operate and a key determinant of valuation. For Coeur Mining, Inc., the environmental pressures are translating directly into capital expenditure and rising asset retirement obligations (AROs). The good news is the company is making measurable progress on climate targets, but the near-term risk remains in the high-cost, non-negotiable mandates like global tailings standards.
Honestly, environmental risk is financial risk now. Every analyst knows that.
Managing water usage and discharge quality, especially at arid sites.
Water stewardship is a critical operational risk, particularly in arid regions like Sonora, Mexico, where the Las Chispas mine is located. Regulatory and community pressure demands not just compliance but demonstrable conservation and quality control. Coeur Mining is responding with significant investment to mitigate this risk.
The company committed a $1.5 million investment in sustainable water infrastructure at the Las Chispas mine. This is a concrete step toward securing a resilient water management system for that operation and the surrounding community. Furthermore, Coeur is collaboratively developing a five-year water stewardship plan for the site, which is essential for long-term operational stability in a water-stressed area. This is how you build a buffer against future regulatory tightening.
Pressure to reduce Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
Coeur has already delivered a significant win on the climate front, exceeding its near-term intensity goal. By the end of 2024, the company achieved a 38% reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) net intensity emissions compared to its 2018-2019 base year. The base year GHG intensity was 14.21 kg CO2e/ton processed. This achievement places them ahead of schedule and provides a strong narrative for climate resilience.
Still, the absolute emissions footprint remains a focus. The total Scope 1 and Scope 2 location-based emissions for Coeur were approximately 284,700 metric tonnes of CO2e in 2024. The ongoing challenge is to maintain this downward trajectory, especially as production is expected to increase significantly in 2025 with the full integration of Las Chispas.
- Scope 1 Emissions (2024): 189,452 metric tonnes CO2e
- Scope 2 Emissions (2024): 95,249 metric tonnes CO2e
- Total Emissions (2024): 284,700 metric tonnes CO2e
Tailings storage facility (TSF) management under stricter global safety standards.
The Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM) is the new non-negotiable baseline for the entire mining industry. Coeur Mining is actively working toward full compliance across its four active TSFs, which include the 'High' hazard potential Final Tailings Dam at Palmarejo.
The company has set a clear deadline: they plan to complete all GISTM requirements across all sites by 2027. As of the end of 2024, they had completed 20% of the outstanding tasks required for full implementation. This compliance effort requires significant capital and operational investment, including advanced monitoring technologies like Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) to proactively measure land structure changes at TSFs and heap leach pads.
Reclamation and closure planning costs rising due to regulatory changes.
The cost of closing a mine responsibly-your Asset Retirement Obligation (ARO)-is rising due to stricter regulatory requirements and higher inflation in labor and materials. This is a direct, quantifiable financial impact on Coeur's balance sheet, and we've seen it tick up throughout 2025.
The primary driver for the increase in 2025 is the higher reclamation and mine closure costs associated with the Las Chispas operation. This is a permanent, non-cash expense that impacts net income through accretion expense. Here's the quick math on the quarterly impact for 2025:
| Period | Asset Retirement Obligation (ARO) Accretion Expense (in millions) |
|---|---|
| Q1 2025 | $17.434 million |
| Q2 2025 | $18.180 million |
| Q3 2025 | $18.935 million |
The quarter-over-quarter increase in ARO accretion expense shows the rising financial provisioning required for future environmental liabilities. This trend will defintely continue as the company integrates new assets and global closure standards tighten. Finance: Track AISC projections against actual inflation data weekly.
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.