JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) Bundle
If you are looking at JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS), you need to look past the National Landing hype and focus on the cold, hard numbers from the 2025 fiscal year. The reality is that the commercial real estate market is still a grind, and it shows up directly in the financials: the company reported a net loss of $93.5 million for the first nine months of 2025, even with a trailing twelve-month (TTM) revenue of around $0.51 Billion USD. That's a serious headwind.
Still, there are bright spots: the Core Funds From Operations (FFO) per share for Q3 2025 came in at $0.15, which is better than some analysts expected, and the aggressive share repurchase program has already cut shares outstanding by about 33% since 2024. But honestly, the commercial operating portfolio's leased rate sits at a soft 77.6%, which tells you the office vacancy problem in the D.C. area is defintely not fixed, so you have to weigh the long-term growth potential of their strategic, mixed-use portfolio against the near-term drag of a challenged office sector. That's the core of the investment decision right now.
Revenue Analysis
You need to know where the money is coming from, especially now that the commercial real estate market is under pressure. For JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS), the direct takeaway is this: their revenue base is contracting, with the trailing twelve months (TTM) revenue down, but the Commercial segment remains the largest contributor, even as the Multifamily segment provides a critical buffer.
Looking at the most recent data through the third quarter of 2025, JBG SMITH Properties' TTM revenue stood at approximately $501.23 million, reflecting a year-over-year decline of about -11.61%. This contraction is a clear signal of the headwinds facing their core Washington, D.C. metro area portfolio. Honestly, that double-digit drop is defintely something to watch, as it's significantly below the broader REIT industry's performance.
The company's primary revenue streams break down into three core segments. For the third quarter of 2025, the total reported revenue was $123.9 million. Here's the quick math on how the primary segments contributed to that total:
- Commercial Property Rental: Generated $52.6 million, contributing about 42.45% of the total Q3 revenue.
- Multifamily Property Rental: Brought in $47.5 million, or roughly 38.34%.
- Third-Party Real Estate Services: Accounted for $6.6 million (excluding reimbursements), which is about 5.33%.
The remaining portion of the revenue comes from other sources, including property reimbursements and development fees. What this breakdown shows is that JBG SMITH Properties is still heavily reliant on its Commercial portfolio, but the Multifamily segment is nearly equal in size, which is a good diversification strategy in the current environment.
The most significant change in the revenue profile is the overall year-over-year decline. The Q3 2025 revenue of $123.9 million was a notable decrease of about -8.9% compared to the $136.0 million reported in the same period last year. This drop is primarily attributed to lower property rental revenue and a dip in third-party real estate services revenue. Specifically, the Same Store Net Operating Income (NOI)-which strips out the impact of new acquisitions and dispositions-fell by 6.7% quarter-over-quarter in Q3 2025.
This decline in Same Store NOI was driven by a few key factors you need to be aware of:
- Lower commercial occupancy and parking revenue.
- Lower multifamily occupancy coupled with higher operating expenses/concessions.
While office leasing momentum is still there-they executed 182,000 square feet of leases in Q3-the overall occupancy rate remains a challenge, with the commercial portfolio only 75.7% occupied and the multifamily portfolio at 87.2% occupied as of September 30, 2025. The National Landing focus (near Amazon HQ) is the long-term play, but the near-term numbers show a clear struggle with existing assets. To be fair, this is a sector-wide issue, not just a JBG SMITH Properties one. For a deeper dive into who is betting on this strategy, you should read Exploring JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why?
Profitability Metrics
JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) is defintely facing a challenging profitability environment, driven by its exposure to the Washington, D.C. office market and elevated operating costs. For the trailing twelve months (TTM) ended September 30, 2025, the company showed a strong gross margin but quickly saw that eroded, resulting in negative operating and net margins.
The direct takeaway is that while the core property operations generate a significant gross profit, the company's overhead, depreciation, interest expense, and other costs are pushing it deep into a net loss position. This is a clear signal of operational and financial strain that you need to factor into your valuation.
Gross, Operating, and Net Margins (TTM 2025)
When we look at the TTM figures ending September 30, 2025, the financial picture is stark. Total revenue for this period was approximately $501.23 million, against a TTM Gross Profit of $249.94 million. Here's the quick math on the key margins:
- Gross Profit Margin: 49.86% (Calculated: $249.94M / $501.23M)
- Operating Profit Margin: -0.75% (Calculated: -$3.77M / $501.23M)
- Net Profit Margin: -30.96% (Calculated: -$155.18M / $501.23M)
The Gross Profit Margin of nearly 50% is solid, reflecting the intrinsic value of the real estate assets. But, the TTM Operating Income of -$3.77 million and the TTM Net Income of -$155.18 million show that general and administrative expenses, plus depreciation and amortization, are consuming all of the gross profit, and then some. The company is losing money on an operating basis, and the net loss is substantial.
Profitability Trends and Industry Context
The negative profitability is not a new issue; it's a persistent, worsening trend. JBG SMITH Properties' net losses have compounded at an annual rate of 25.9% over the last five years, with no visible turnaround in the reported figures as of October 2025. This unyielding loss rate is a major concern about the company's cost discipline and its ability to adapt to sector headwinds.
To be fair, the broader office REIT sector is struggling. Office REITs are trading at one of the largest discounts to Net Asset Value (NAV) in the industry, at around 44.1%, and have some of the lowest Funds From Operations (FFO) multiples, around 9x. JBG SMITH Properties, with its heavy concentration in the Washington, D.C. area, is caught in this downdraft. The TTM Net Profit Margin of -30.96% is a significant underperformance compared to the broader, often positive, margins seen in healthier REIT segments like multifamily or industrial.
Operational Efficiency and Cost Management
The decline in operational efficiency is clear in the third quarter 2025 results. Same Store Net Operating Income (SSNOI), a key operational metric for a REIT, decreased by 6.7% quarter-over-quarter, falling to $54.1 million. This decline was driven by two factors:
- Lower commercial occupancy and parking revenue.
- Higher utilities and operating expenses in both the commercial and multifamily segments.
This tells you that JBG SMITH Properties is facing a double-whammy: a revenue problem from soft leasing and a cost problem from inflation in utilities and other operating expenses. The annualized Net Operating Income (NOI) at the company's share, excluding sold or recently acquired assets, fell to $232.9 million in Q3 2025, down from $242.2 million in Q2 2025. That's a clear drop in the core income-generating engine. You can read more about the company's long-term vision in their Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS).
Here is a summary of the most recent quarterly margins for context:
| Metric | Q3 2025 Value | Q3 2025 Margin |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $123.870 million | N/A |
| Net Loss Attributable to Common Shareholders | $28.555 million | N/A |
| Net Income Margin | N/A | (23.1766%) |
| EBITDA Margin | N/A | 36.8853% |
The high EBITDA margin compared to the deeply negative Net Income Margin highlights the massive impact of non-cash charges like depreciation and amortization, and significant interest expense, on the bottom line. Operational efficiency needs to focus on leasing up the commercial portfolio and getting a handle on rising utility costs.
Debt vs. Equity Structure
JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) is maintaining a debt-heavy capital structure, which is common for a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), but its leverage metrics are elevated compared to the broader industry. As of the most recent quarter in 2025, the company's total debt stood at approximately $2.51 billion. This level of debt is necessary to finance its substantial portfolio of mixed-use properties, particularly the high-profile National Landing development in Northern Virginia.
The company's reliance on debt is best captured by its Debt-to-Equity (D/E) ratio, which was reported at 142.94% (or 1.43) in the most recent quarter of 2025. This means for every dollar of shareholder equity, the company has about $1.43 in debt financing. For context, the long-term debt component alone accounts for a D/E ratio of 133.83%. While REITs are capital-intensive and typically carry more debt than other sectors, the general REIT industry average shows a more conservative balance, with a Debt-to-Market Asset ratio around 32.5% in 2025. JBGS's higher ratio signals a more aggressive, or at least a more highly leveraged, position in the current market cycle.
In terms of managing this debt, JBG SMITH Properties has been active in refinancing. In March 2025, for example, the company secured a new five-year, interest-only mortgage loan for $258.9 million at a fixed interest rate of 5.03%, which was used to repay a larger outstanding loan. This move helps lock in financing costs and manage maturity schedules, a smart move in a high-rate environment. They also repaid a $99.7 million mortgage loan in February 2025 following an asset sale. Still, the fact that the company's Net Debt to Annualized Adjusted EBITDA was 12.6x as of Q3 2025 shows the leverage is a key factor to watch.
To balance this debt financing, JBG SMITH Properties has aggressively focused on equity management through share repurchases, a clear signal that management believes the stock is undervalued relative to its underlying assets. In the first three quarters of 2025 alone, the company repurchased and retired a total of 15.3 million common shares for a combined $250.4 million. This strategy reduces the share count, which can boost per-share metrics like Funds From Operations (FFO), but it also contributed to a significant decrease in shareholders' equity to $1.2 billion by Q3 2025. That's a defintely high-stakes balancing act between debt and equity, prioritizing a tighter capital structure over reducing the absolute debt load. If you are looking for more details on the company's performance, you can check out Breaking Down JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
- Total Debt (Q3 2025): $2.51 Billion
- Debt-to-Equity Ratio: 142.94%
- Q1-Q3 2025 Share Repurchases: $250.4 Million
| Metric | JBG SMITH Properties (Q3 2025) | Industry Context (US REITs 2025) | Insight |
| Total Debt | $2.51 Billion | N/A | Substantial capital base for large-scale developments. |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio | 1.43 (142.94%) | Varies, but generally lower | Higher leverage than many peers, indicating higher risk/reward profile. |
| Recent Refinancing Rate | 5.03% Fixed Rate | Average REIT Debt Rate: 4.2% | New debt is slightly above the industry average rate. |
Liquidity and Solvency
You need to know how easily JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) can cover its short-term bills, and the data from the third quarter of 2025 gives us a clear picture: their liquidity is adequate, but it relies heavily on non-cash current assets. The company maintains a positive working capital position, but their cash flow strategy is currently focused on strategic asset sales and share repurchases, not just operating cash flow.
Current and Quick Ratios: A Look at Liquidity
JBG SMITH Properties' liquidity position, as of the most recent quarter (MRQ) in 2025, shows they can meet their immediate obligations, but with a thin margin. The Current Ratio sits at 1.21. Here's the quick math: for every dollar of short-term debt, the company has $1.21 in short-term assets to cover it. That's positive working capital (current assets exceed current liabilities), which is defintely a strength.
However, the Quick Ratio is lower, at 1.04. This ratio strips out inventory and other less-liquid assets from the current assets, giving a truer measure of immediate cash-based coverage. The gap between the two ratios is small, which is typical for a real estate investment trust (REIT) like JBG SMITH Properties, since they generally have minimal inventory compared to a retailer or manufacturer. Still, it tells you that a significant portion of their current assets is not immediately cash or receivables.
- Current Ratio: 1.21 (Adequate short-term coverage)
- Quick Ratio: 1.04 (Immediate cash-based coverage is tighter)
- Working Capital: Positive, but not excessive, indicating efficient management of short-term resources.
Cash Flow Statements Overview and Trends
When we look at the cash flow statement, we see a company actively managing its portfolio and capital structure. While specific consolidated cash flow from operations (CFO) for the full year isn't yet finalized, the investing and financing activities in Q3 2025 were significant. The company's strategy involves monetizing non-core assets to fuel capital returns and reduce debt.
Key cash flow trends for JBG SMITH Properties in the near-term include:
- Investing Cash Flow: A notable source of cash in Q3 2025 was the sale of a multifamily asset, The Batley, for $155.0 million in July 2025. This is a strategic move to unlock capital from stabilized properties.
- Financing Cash Flow: The company used capital for shareholder returns, repurchasing 3.1 million common shares for $62.9 million during the third quarter of 2025. This signals confidence in the stock's valuation, but it's a cash outflow.
Potential Liquidity Concerns or Strengths
The primary strength is the significant access to capital outside of the current balance sheet. As of September 30, 2025, JBG SMITH Properties had $585.2 million of undrawn capacity under its revolving credit facility. This acts as a powerful liquidity cushion, far exceeding the consolidated cash and cash equivalents of $64.4 million. Their Net Debt to total enterprise value was 59.8% as of September 30, 2025, which, while high, is managed with this available credit. The real estate market remains challenging, especially for office space, so the company's ability to execute on asset sales remains a critical liquidity strength. You can dive deeper into the market dynamics in Exploring JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why?
The main risk is the reliance on asset sales to generate large, non-operating cash inflows. If the real estate market for their development pipeline or non-core assets softens further, this source of liquidity could slow down. Still, the available credit line provides a strong, near-term backstop.
Valuation Analysis
You want to know if JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) is a buy, a hold, or a sell right now. The quick answer is that traditional valuation metrics point to an 'undervalued' status based on assets, but the market's consensus is a definitive 'Strong Sell' due to earnings and cash flow challenges. It's a classic real estate investment trust (REIT) puzzle: cheap assets, but weak operations.
As a seasoned analyst, I look past the noise and focus on the core ratios. Here's the quick math on JBG SMITH Properties' valuation metrics based on recent 2025 fiscal year data, which paint a mixed picture:
- Price-to-Book (P/B): The P/B ratio is sitting at approximately 0.88. A ratio below 1.0 suggests the stock is trading for less than the value of its net assets, which often signals a potential undervaluation.
- Price-to-Earnings (P/E): This is where the picture gets complicated. JBG SMITH Properties has reported a diluted loss per share of $0.48 in Q3 2025, making the P/E ratio negative or not meaningful (NM). You can't compare a negative P/E to the market, so we have to look deeper.
- Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA): The trailing twelve months (TTM) EV/EBITDA is around 20.67. For a REIT, this is on the higher side, but some models place its forward EV/EBITDA of 21.36 in a 'Fairly Valued' range compared to its own historical trend.
The stock has seen a decent run-up, gaining about +16.50% over the last 52 weeks, but it's still trading well below its 52-week high of $24.30. This volatility shows the market is defintely trying to price in the long-term value of its National Landing assets against the near-term drag from office market weakness.
The dividend situation is a major red flag for income-focused investors. While the stock offers a trailing dividend yield of around 3.98%, the payout ratio based on Funds Available for Distribution (FAD) was elevated at 114.5% year-to-date through Q3 2025. Honestly, paying out more than you're generating in distributable cash flow is not a sustainable long-term strategy, and analysts anticipate a potential dividend cut of up to -20.45% for the current fiscal year. You need to factor that risk into your total return expectation.
The Street's consensus is clear: the average analyst rating for JBG SMITH Properties is a 'Strong Sell,' with an average 12-month price target hovering around $17.33 to $17.50. This target is essentially flat or slightly below the current price of $17.76, suggesting very limited upside in the near term. The highest target is only $19.00, so the range of outcomes is tight and bearish. You can read more about the full financial picture in Breaking Down JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
What this estimate hides is the potential for a massive re-rating if the National Landing development fully stabilizes and the office market recovers, but that's a multi-year bet, not a near-term catalyst. The market is pricing the company based on its current weak earnings, not its future asset value.
| Metric | Value (Approx.) | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Stock Price (Nov 2025) | $17.76 | Current market price. |
| Price-to-Book (P/B) | 0.88 | Suggests potential undervaluation relative to assets. |
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | Negative / NM | Not meaningful due to negative earnings. |
| EV/EBITDA (TTM) | 20.67x | Higher end of fair value range for its historical trend. |
| Dividend Yield | 3.98% | Attractive on paper, but high payout risk. |
| FAD Payout Ratio (YTD Q3 2025) | 114.5% | Unsustainable; dividend is not covered by cash flow. |
| Analyst Consensus | Strong Sell | Limited near-term upside expected. |
Your next step should be to model the impact of a dividend cut to $0.50 per share and see if the resulting yield and total return still meet your investment hurdle. That's the realistic scenario you need to plan for.
Risk Factors
You're looking for the clearest path through JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS)'s current financial landscape, and honestly, the path is marked by a few significant, near-term risks. The direct takeaway is this: while the strategic focus on National Landing is a long-term play, the company is battling a challenging commercial real estate market and high operating costs right now, which is hitting their bottom line.
The company's primary risks in the 2025 fiscal year fall into three buckets: market concentration, financial strain, and macro-economic headwinds. Here's the quick math: the year-to-date net loss through September 30, 2025, was $93.5 million, a clear signal of persistent operational challenges.
External and Strategic Risks: The National Landing Concentration
The biggest external risk is also JBG SMITH Properties' greatest opportunity: its heavy concentration in the National Landing submarket. Approximately 75% of the company's holdings are anchored there, strategically located near major demand drivers like Amazon's headquarters and Virginia Tech's Innovation Campus.
- Single-Market Exposure: Any localized economic downturn in the Washington, D.C. area, or a delay in a key project, creates an outsized vulnerability.
- Government Uncertainty: The D.C. market is deeply tied to federal operations. A government shutdown, which impacted the region's economic activity in 2025, or any future federal workforce optimization (layoffs or footprint reduction) poses a direct threat to commercial leasing decisions.
This is a classic high-risk, high-reward bet. If National Landing fully matures, the payoff is huge, but until then, you're exposed to a single point of failure.
Operational and Financial Risks: The Office Drag
The operational and financial risks are intertwined, largely driven by the weak commercial real estate sector and mounting expenses. The commercial portfolio is the main drag, with a leased rate of only 77.6% as of September 30, 2025. The multifamily segment is holding up better, but the annualized Net Operating Income (NOI) still decreased by 3.8% quarter-over-quarter to $232.9 million in Q3 2025, reflecting the overall pressure.
Plus, rising utility and operating costs are eating into profits. The Q3 2025 net loss of $28.6 million highlights this cost-profit squeeze. On the financial side, the company's leverage is high, with net debt at $2.5 billion and a net debt-to-total enterprise value ratio of 59.8% as of Q3 2025. This high leverage limits flexibility, especially in an environment of uncertain interest rates.
Here is a snapshot of the operational challenge:
| Metric (Q3 2025) | Value | Context |
| Commercial Portfolio Leased Rate | 77.6% | Indicates significant vacancy risk. |
| Multifamily Portfolio Leased Rate | 89.1% | Shows relative strength, but still below peak. |
| Annualized NOI (Q-o-Q Change) | -3.8% (to $232.9M) | Profitability is declining due to costs/vacancy. |
Mitigation and Actionable Steps
JBG SMITH Properties is defintely not standing still. Their mitigation strategy centers on capital reallocation and maintaining liquidity. The strategic move is to divest lower-performing Central Business District (CBD) office assets and redirect that capital into multifamily development, which is a segment with better occupancy.
- Capital Reallocation: Focus on high-quality, mixed-use development, like the completion of Valen, a 355-unit multifamily tower in National Landing.
- Liquidity Buffer: The company maintains a healthy liquidity position with $64.4 million in cash and cash equivalents and an additional $585.2 million in undrawn capacity under its revolving credit facility as of September 30, 2025.
- Share Buybacks: They've been aggressive in reducing shares outstanding, repurchasing 26.8 million shares this year, totaling $443.1 million, which is designed to boost net asset value (NAV) per share.
The action for you, the investor, is to monitor the commercial leasing velocity closely. The success of the strategy hinges on the commercial leased rate moving above 80% in the next two quarters. For a deeper dive into the company's strategic pivot, you should read the full analysis on Breaking Down JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) Financial Health: Key Insights for Investors.
Growth Opportunities
You're looking at JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and trying to map the path from its current financial headwinds-like the $35.0 million net loss in Q3 2025-to future growth. Honestly, the entire investment thesis rests on one simple, powerful concept: location. Specifically, the National Landing submarket in Northern Virginia.
This isn't just a bet on real estate; it's a bet on regional economic anchors. Approximately 75.0% of JBG SMITH Properties' holdings are concentrated here, a strategic position buoyed by four key demand drivers: Amazon's headquarters, Virginia Tech's $1 billion Innovation Campus, the proximity to the Pentagon, and the company's intensive placemaking efforts. This concentration provides a clear, long-term competitive advantage over more geographically dispersed peers.
- Focus on National Landing: 75.0% of assets concentrated in a high-demand submarket.
- Office Leasing Momentum: Q3 2025 saw 182,000 square feet of executed leases.
- Pricing Power: Second-generation office leases achieved a strong +11.1% cash rent mark-to-market in Q3 2025.
The core growth engine is the development pipeline, which is heavily skewed toward high-demand multifamily units. JBG SMITH Properties maintains a substantial pipeline encompassing 8.9 million square feet of estimated potential development density, predominantly multifamily. This is the future revenue stream. For example, the company completed construction on The Zoe (420 units) in Q1 2025 and delivered Valen (355 units) in Q3 2025, with lease-up progressing across these new towers. Stabilizing these assets will be crucial for moderating the Q3 2025 Net Debt/annualized Adjusted EBITDA ratio of 12.6x.
Future Revenue and Earnings Estimates
Near-term, the financial outlook remains challenging, reflecting the broader market's higher interest rates and operating expenses. Here's the quick math on what analysts are projecting for the full 2025 fiscal year. What this estimate hides, of course, is the timing of when the development pipeline starts contributing significant cash flow.
| Metric | 2025 Consensus Estimate | YoY Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Full Year Revenue | $414.12 million | Down from $546.89M in 2024 |
| Full Year FFO per Share | $0.60 | Down 27.31% from 2024 |
| Full Year EPS | -$2.07 | Expected Net Loss |
| Q4 2025 Revenue (Projected) | $102.131 million | Sequential Decline from Q3 2025 |
The consensus for Funds From Operations (FFO) per share for 2025 is $0.60, a significant drop, but the expected growth for 2026 is projected to be around 32.05% to $0.80 per share. That jump is defintely tied to the successful lease-up of the new multifamily product.
Strategic Levers and Competitive Edge
Beyond the National Landing concentration, JBG SMITH Properties has two other key levers. First is their focus on placemaking, which translates to creating vibrant, walkable neighborhoods that attract and retain high-quality tenants-a critical differentiator in the current office market. Second, the company has been aggressively reducing its share count, repurchasing 69.0 million shares since 2020 at an average price of $19.08 per share. This capital allocation strategy supports the stock price and increases ownership for remaining shareholders.
Also, the firm is heavily committed to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) initiatives, aiming for a net-zero carbon emissions strategy and setting interim 2030 performance targets. This isn't just corporate window dressing; for institutional investors, this is increasingly a requirement, not a preference. Plus, their Impact Pool, an affordable housing investment platform, surpassed its goal of creating/preserving 3,000 units by 2025, which strengthens community ties and provides a diversified revenue stream.
To understand the players betting on this long-term vision, you should read Exploring JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) Investor Profile: Who's Buying and Why?.

JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) DCF Excel Template
5-Year Financial Model
40+ Charts & Metrics
DCF & Multiple Valuation
Free Email Support
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.