|
JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS): 5 FORCES Analysis [Nov-2025 Updated] |
Fully Editable: Tailor To Your Needs In Excel Or Sheets
Professional Design: Trusted, Industry-Standard Templates
Investor-Approved Valuation Models
MAC/PC Compatible, Fully Unlocked
No Expertise Is Needed; Easy To Follow
JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) Bundle
You're trying to map out the real competitive landscape for JBG SMITH Properties right now, heading into late 2025, and honestly, the picture is mixed. We've got high interest rates giving financial capital suppliers serious leverage, while the office side is feeling the heat-remember, the commercial portfolio was only 77.6% leased as of September 30, 2025, giving tenants, especially an anchor like Amazon, major bargaining power. Still, the massive capital and regulatory hurdles in the DC metro area keep new entrants at bay, and their 8.7 million square feet development pipeline in National Landing offers a strategic moat. Dive in below for the full, unvarnished breakdown of how all five of Porter's forces are shaping the risk and reward profile for JBGS today.
JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) - Porter's Five Forces: Bargaining power of suppliers
You're looking at the cost side of JBG SMITH Properties' operations, where supplier power can directly squeeze Net Operating Income (NOI). Honestly, the cost environment in late 2025 is a major factor you need to watch.
High construction costs and rising utility expenses impact NOI. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, JBG SMITH's Annualized NOI was reported at $264.4 million (excluding assets sold). The multifamily portfolio's Same Store NOI increased 0.2% for the same period, but this was achieved while navigating higher operating expenses, which included utilities.
Specialized construction contractors for large mixed-use projects have moderate power. JBG SMITH maintains a development pipeline encompassing 8.7 million square feet of mixed-use opportunities as of October 2025. Securing the right specialized labor and materials for this volume of urban infill development definitely gives key contractors leverage.
JBG SMITH uses long-term utility supply agreements to control pricing risk. The company actively seeks expert market intelligence and analytics to lower expenses and commodity volatility. They employ supply agreements to lock in pricing, while still maintaining flexibility for property sales or redevelopment. JBG SMITH is also committed to maintaining carbon neutral operations annually.
Financial capital suppliers (lenders) have high power due to elevated interest rates. While the Federal Reserve pivoted rate cuts, bringing the federal funds rate down to 4.25%-4.5% in 2025, the 10-year Treasury rate stood at approximately 4.47% as of May 2025. This environment translates to higher borrowing costs for JBG SMITH, evidenced by a fixed interest rate of 5.03% on a $258.9 million mortgage loan they entered into in March 2025.
Land suppliers in high-barrier-to-entry DC urban infill markets have significant leverage. JBG SMITH's portfolio is heavily concentrated, with approximately 75.0% of holdings located in the National Landing submarket. This focus on prime, Metro-served, urban infill locations means that sellers of desirable, entitled land parcels in these constrained markets hold substantial pricing power.
Here's a quick look at some of the key figures influencing supplier dynamics:
| Supplier Category | Relevant Metric/Data Point | Value/Rate (as of 2025) |
| Financial Capital (Lenders) | Federal Funds Rate (Range) | 4.25%-4.5% |
| Financial Capital (Lenders) | 10-Year Treasury Rate (May 2025) | 4.47% |
| Financial Capital (Lenders) | JBGS Fixed Mortgage Rate (March 2025) | 5.03% |
| Construction/Development | Development Pipeline Size | 8.7 million to 8.9 million sq ft |
| Operations (Utilities) | Portfolio Size (Share) | 12.0 million to 12.5 million sq ft |
| Operations (Utilities) | Annualized NOI (Q1 2025) | $264.4 million to $270.1 million |
| Land Acquisition | National Landing Portfolio Concentration | 75.0% |
The power dynamic from key suppliers can be summarized by their direct impact on JBG SMITH's costs and development pipeline:
- Lenders exert high power due to borrowing costs remaining elevated above 4.47%.
- Utility suppliers face JBG SMITH's strategy of locking in pricing via long-term agreements.
- Specialized contractors command leverage given the 8.7 million square feet development pipeline.
- Land sellers in National Landing hold significant leverage due to JBG SMITH's 75.0% asset concentration there.
- Rising utility expenses contributed to pressure on Same Store NOI growth in Q1 2025.
Finance: draft 13-week cash view by Friday.
JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) - Porter's Five Forces: Bargaining power of customers
You're looking at the customer side of the equation for JBG SMITH Properties, and honestly, the power dynamic shifts quite a bit depending on whether you are talking office or apartment tenants in the Washington, DC metro area.
For the office segment, the bargaining power is definitely high. This is driven by the persistent softness in the broader metro area office market. As of September 30, 2025, JBG SMITH Properties' operating commercial portfolio stood at only 77.6% leased, at their share. That vacancy level gives tenants significant leverage when negotiating terms.
Here's a quick look at how the two main customer segments stack up based on recent metrics:
| Property Type | Key Metric | Latest Reported Figure |
| Office (Commercial) | Leased Percentage (as of 9/30/2025) | 77.6% |
| Multifamily (In-Service Occupancy) | Occupancy Rate (as of 3/31/2025) | 94.3% |
| Multifamily (Same Store Occupancy) | Occupancy Rate (as of 9/30/2025) | 92.2% |
Multifamily customers, on the other hand, hold considerably less power. The in-service occupancy for the multifamily portfolio was 94.3% as of March 31, 2025. Even looking at the third quarter's end, the Same Store multifamily portfolio was 92.2% occupied as of September 30, 2025. That tighter occupancy suggests residents have fewer immediate alternatives, which helps JBG SMITH maintain pricing power, though same-store effective rents for new leases actually decreased by 0.8% in Q3 2025.
The concentration of JBG SMITH Properties' assets in National Landing means that key anchor tenants wield outsized influence. Approximately 75.0% of JBG SMITH's holdings are located in this submarket, which is anchored by Amazon's headquarters. While Amazon's presence is a demand driver, any negotiation leverage held by such a large, singular customer is magnified.
Federal government leasing uncertainty introduces another layer of risk that empowers certain customers. Nearly a quarter of the REIT's nearly 5 million-square-foot office and retail portfolio is leased to the government, with an additional roughly 1.3 million square feet leased to government contractors. The GSA's existing leases with JBG SMITH brought in $67.6M in rent per year, based on figures reported earlier in 2025, showing direct exposure to federal spending decisions.
- Office leasing volume in Q1 2025 was anemic, with many deals paused due to federal uncertainty.
- Second-generation office leases in Q3 2025 saw a rental rate increase of 11.1% on a cash basis.
- The company executed approximately 182,000 square feet of office leases in the three months ending September 30, 2025.
- Amazonians living in the National Landing multifamily portfolio increased by 12.7% after the company mandated a full-time return to the office on January 2, 2025.
JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) - Porter's Five Forces: Competitive rivalry
You're looking at the competitive dynamics in the Washington D.C. market, and honestly, the numbers for the office sector tell a tough story right now. The intense rivalry in the D.C. office market is clearly visible when you look at JBG SMITH Properties' Same Store Net Operating Income (SSNOI) growth.
For the three months ended March 31, 2025, JBG SMITH's consolidated portfolio posted a negative 5.5% change in Same Store NOI. This pressure continued into the third quarter; for the three months ended September 30, 2025, SSNOI at JBG SMITH's share decreased 6.7% quarter-over-quarter, landing at $54.1 million. That kind of sustained negative growth signals that landlords are fighting hard for every dollar of rent, which is the definition of high rivalry.
However, JBG SMITH is using its high capital commitment to National Landing as a competitive moat. Approximately 75.0% of JBG SMITH's holdings are concentrated in the National Landing submarket. This area is anchored by major demand drivers like Amazon's headquarters and Virginia Tech's $1 billion Innovation Campus. To reinforce this position, JBG SMITH is actively taking obsolete office stock offline, planning to remove over 1.0 million square feet in National Landing. Furthermore, JBG SMITH is investing $40 million to reposition 2011 Crystal Drive into an amenity-filled hub for its National Landing office tenants.
Direct competition comes from other large, well-capitalized REITs operating in the same geography. We can see the market's perception of these players through their trading multiples as of mid-September 2025. JBG SMITH is trading at a significant premium relative to some peers, which suggests the market values its specific strategy, but it also highlights the established competition.
| Company | FY 2026 FFO Multiple (Consensus) |
|---|---|
| JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) | 28x |
| Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) | 17.7x |
| BXP, Inc. (BXP) | 10.9x |
The data shows JBG SMITH trades at 28x consensus FY 2026 FFO, while Vornado trades at 17.7x and BXP at 10.9x. This valuation gap suggests investors see a difference in asset quality or future prospects, which ties directly into JBG SMITH's differentiation strategy.
JBG SMITH's placemaking strategy is designed to pull assets out of the commodity office space pile. The focus is on cultivating vibrant, amenity-rich, walkable neighborhoods. This focus appears to be yielding some success in leasing, despite the overall market softness. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, JBG SMITH executed approximately 461,000 square feet of office leases at its share. More importantly, second-generation office leases generated an 11.1% rental rate increase on a cash basis for the three months ended September 30, 2025.
The multifamily segment, while still competitive, is showing more resilience than the office sector. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Same Store multifamily portfolio actually saw NOI increase by 0.2%. This contrasts sharply with the negative office NOI growth. Still, the multifamily market faces its own pressures:
- Q3 2025 Same Store multifamily leased rate was 92.2% occupied.
- Effective rents on new multifamily leases decreased by 0.8% in Q3 2025.
- The renewal rate for multifamily in Q3 2025 was 56.3%.
To be fair, the multifamily segment is where JBG SMITH is pivoting capital, selling assets like a 432-unit building in NoMa for $155M in Q2 2025 to fund office acquisitions and buybacks. The overall picture is one of intense competition in office, where differentiation is key to achieving positive rent growth, and a more stable, but still contested, multifamily environment.
Finance: draft 13-week cash view by Friday.
JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of substitutes
The threat of substitutes for JBG SMITH Properties centers on alternatives that fulfill the same need-office space for businesses or rental housing for residents-but come from outside the traditional commercial real estate sector. This is a significant pressure point in the current market, especially for the commercial portfolio.
Office-to-residential conversion is a major substitute for traditional office space. When an office building is converted, it permanently removes that square footage from the office supply, effectively substituting a future office tenant with a residential one. This trend is actively reshaping the urban landscape. For context, the current office vacancy rate reported in the city was as high as 23.5 percent, signaling a large pool of potential substitutes for new office construction or leasing. JBG SMITH Properties' operating portfolio as of September 30, 2025, included 21 commercial assets totaling 7.0 million square feet at their share.
Remote and hybrid work models substitute for physical office demand. While mandates are pushing utilization higher, the underlying need for physical space has structurally changed. Data from early 2025 showed the Washington D.C. office occupancy rate hitting a record-high average of 51.5 percent in the last week of January, indicating that over 48 percent of the workforce was still not physically present on peak days. Nationally, hybrid work is the standard, with 66% of US companies offering some form of flexibility as of September 2025, which dampens long-term demand for large, traditional footprints.
Suburban office parks offer a lower-cost substitute for urban core office space. While JBG SMITH Properties is heavily concentrated in the urban-infill National Landing submarket (approximately 75.0% of holdings), tenants facing cost pressures may look outside the core. Older data from Q2 2023 illustrated a substantial price gap, with Class A asking rent in Washington D.C. suburbs at approximately $39.29 per square foot compared to the urban core average of $74.01 per square foot. Even with a flight-to-quality trend, this cost differential remains a powerful substitute consideration for cost-conscious firms.
The residential rental market is substituted by homeownership, though DC affordability is a barrier. For JBG SMITH Properties' multifamily segment, the alternative is tenants purchasing a home. However, high entry costs in the D.C. area keep many renters in the market. While US asking rents cooled to $1,599 in January 2025, which is 6.2% below the August 2022 peak of $1,700, the overall cost of buying remains a hurdle for many, supporting rental demand. The threat is mitigated by the high cost of entry into the ownership market.
Office conversion of 550,000 square feet by JBG SMITH mitigates this threat internally. JBG SMITH Properties is proactively addressing the office substitution threat by becoming a source of residential supply. They secured approval to convert two vacant office buildings totaling 550,000 square feet in Arlington, Virginia, into a 195-unit apartment community and a 344-key hotel, with construction expected to start by the end of 2025. This move turns a liability (obsolete office space) into an asset class (multifamily/hospitality) that faces a different set of substitutes.
Here's a quick look at the key market dynamics influencing the threat of substitutes:
- DC Metro Total Office Vacancy (Q3 2025): 18.0%.
- Trophy Office Vacancy (Q3 2025): 10.2%.
- JBG SMITH Office Portfolio Size (Q3 2025): 7.0 million square feet.
- JBG SMITH Conversion Project Size: 550,000 square feet.
- US Average Asking Rent (January 2025): $1,599.
We can map the primary substitutes and their associated risks to JBG SMITH Properties' core segments:
| Substitute Type | JBG SMITH Affected Segment | Observed Market Pressure/Metric |
| Office-to-Residential Conversion | Commercial (Office) | DC City Office Vacancy: 23.5% |
| Hybrid/Remote Work | Commercial (Office) | DC Office Occupancy (Jan 2025): 51.5% |
| Suburban Office Space | Commercial (Office) | DC CBD Class A Vacancy (Q1 2025): 18.5% |
| Homeownership | Multifamily (Rental) | US Rents 6.2% below 2022 peak |
JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of new entrants
You're looking at the barriers to entry in the Washington, DC, real estate development space, especially for a specialized submarket like National Landing. Honestly, the threat from new entrants is quite low, and that's largely because the sheer scale of capital required is a massive hurdle. To compete here, you need deep pockets and a long-term view, something JBG SMITH Properties has demonstrated with its total development pipeline approaching 19 million square feet across the DC region.
The regulatory environment itself acts as a significant moat. Navigating zoning, approvals, and the complex public-private partnerships required for large-scale, mixed-use transformation-like the $12 billion in combined public and private infrastructure enhancements in National Landing-is a specialized skill set. For instance, JBG SMITH recently secured approval from Arlington County to convert over 550,000 square feet of vacant office space into new residential and hotel uses, showcasing their ability to work within the local policy framework, including their success with adaptive reuse projects where they've already transformed space for over 1,300 units.
JBG SMITH holds a unique position because of the sheer size of its controlled assets in the key growth area. While the prompt suggests a pipeline of 8.7 million square feet, what we can confirm is that JBG SMITH controls 8.2 million square feet of additional development density in National Landing alone, anchored by major entities like Amazon and the $1 billion Virginia Tech Innovation Campus. This level of control over future density, combined with existing assets like 5.6 million square feet of office space, creates an integrated platform that new players can't easily replicate.
Also, the cost of land acquisition in prime, Metro-served submarkets is prohibitive for smaller firms. You're not just buying dirt; you're buying into a master-planned ecosystem. New entrants face difficulty competing with established, integrated placemaking platforms like JBG SMITH Properties. Their in-house team of designers, planners, and retail experts focuses on the '20 feet of sidewalk and 20 feet of street façade,' creating curated street experiences that drive sales velocity and rent growth-a level of holistic development that takes years, if not decades, to build. It's about more than just construction; it's about creating a cohesive 'New City' market.
Here's a quick look at the scale that deters competition:
- Total JBG SMITH development pipeline: nearly 19 million square feet.
- Additional development density controlled in National Landing: 8.2 million square feet.
- Existing/under construction multifamily units in National Landing: 4,223.
- Total infrastructure investment in National Landing: $12 billion.
- WMATA FY2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program: $11.1 billion.
The financial commitment needed to even begin to match this scale is staggering. Consider the capital required just for public transit backbone maintenance, where the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's (Metro) FY2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program totals $11.1 billion. That's the public side; the private side demands similar commitment for projects like the $1 billion Virginia Tech Innovation Campus.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Total Development Pipeline (DC Region) | 19 million square feet | Scale of future projects across the region. |
| Controlled Additional Development Density (National Landing) | 8.2 million square feet | Density JBG SMITH controls for future build-out. |
| Office Space Conversion Approved (Recent) | 550,000 square feet | Scale of recent adaptive reuse project approval. |
| Completed Adaptive Reuse Units (To Date) | Over 1,300 units | Track record in navigating regulatory conversion programs. |
| Total Infrastructure Investment (National Landing) | $12 billion | Public and private funds enhancing the submarket. |
The barriers to entry are structural, not just financial. New entrants must contend with JBG SMITH's established relationships and their proven ability to execute complex, multi-faceted placemaking strategies. They've already delivered nearly 1,600 new apartments in National Landing since 2024, with properties like The Grace and Reva achieving over 80% leased status. That kind of immediate, high-demand absorption signals a market that is already being shaped by an incumbent leader.
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.