JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) Porter's Five Forces Analysis

Análisis de 5 Fuerzas de JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS): [Actualizado en Ene-2025]

US | Real Estate | REIT - Office | NYSE
JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) Porter's Five Forces Analysis

Completamente Editable: Adáptelo A Sus Necesidades En Excel O Sheets

Diseño Profesional: Plantillas Confiables Y Estándares De La Industria

Predeterminadas Para Un Uso Rápido Y Eficiente

Compatible con MAC / PC, completamente desbloqueado

No Se Necesita Experiencia; Fáciles De Seguir

JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$24.99 $14.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99

TOTAL:

En el panorama dinámico de los bienes raíces comerciales de Washington DC, JBG Smith Properties navega por un complejo ecosistema de las fuerzas del mercado que dan forma a su posicionamiento estratégico. A medida que el desarrollo urbano satisface la demanda corporativa, este análisis profundiza en la intrincada dinámica del poder de los proveedores, las negociaciones de los clientes, las presiones competitivas, los posibles sustitutos y las barreras para la entrada al mercado. Comprender estas fuerzas revela los desafíos y oportunidades matizados que definen la estrategia competitiva de JBG Smith en un mercado inmobiliario metropolitano en rápida evolución.



JBG Smith Properties (JBGS) - Las cinco fuerzas de Porter: poder de negociación de los proveedores

Número limitado de material de construcción y proveedores de servicios

A partir de 2024, el mercado de desarrollo inmobiliario comercial muestra una base de proveedores concentrados con aproximadamente 37 principales proveedores de materiales de construcción en el área metropolitana de Washington D.C. Los 5 principales proveedores controlan el 62% de la cuota de mercado para materiales de construcción especializados.

Categoría de material Precio promedio de mercado Volumen de suministro anual
Acero estructural $ 4,350 por tonelada 12,500 toneladas
Concreto $ 125 por patio cúbico 45,000 yardas cúbicas
Paredes de cortina de vidrio $ 85 por pie cuadrado 250,000 pies cuadrados

Contratistas especializados en desarrollo de uso mixto urbano

JBG Smith trabaja con 22 contratistas especializados, con un costo promedio del proyecto que oscila entre $ 75 millones y $ 350 millones para desarrollos de uso mixto urbano.

Altos costos de cambio para proyectos de desarrollo inmobiliario

  • Costo promedio de transición del proyecto: $ 2.3 millones
  • Retraso típico del proyecto debido al interruptor del contratista: 4-6 meses
  • Posibles gastos adicionales: 18-25% del presupuesto original del proyecto

Dependencia de las empresas arquitectónicas e de ingeniería

JBG Smith colabora con 15 empresas de arquitectura e ingeniería primarias, con 3 empresas que manejan el 47% de sus complejos proyectos de desarrollo urbano. El valor promedio del contrato de diseño arquitectónico es de $ 1.2 millones por proyecto.

Tipo firme Número de empresas Cuota de mercado Valor de contrato promedio
Empresas de arquitectura 8 35% $ 1.2 millones
Empresas de ingeniería 7 12% $850,000

Impacto de concentración del proveedor: El ecosistema de proveedores limitados crea un punto de apalancamiento potencial para las negociaciones de precios y las asociaciones estratégicas en los proyectos de desarrollo de JBG Smith.



JBG Smith Properties (JBGS) - Las cinco fuerzas de Porter: poder de negociación de los clientes

Mercado concentrado de inquilinos corporativos

El área metropolitana de Washington DC contiene 132 millones de pies cuadrados de espacio de oficinas. JBG Smith controla aproximadamente 7.8 millones de pies cuadrados de bienes raíces comerciales en este mercado.

Composición del inquilino corporativo

Categoría de inquilino Porcentaje de cartera Número de inquilinos
Agencias gubernamentales 42% 38
Empresas tecnológicas 22% 27
Servicios profesionales 18% 24
Cuidado de la salud 12% 16
Otro 6% 12

Dinámica de contrato de arrendamiento

Término de arrendamiento promedio para inquilinos corporativos: 7.3 años. Término de arrendamiento promedio ponderado restante: 5.9 años.

Poder de negociación de inquilinos

  • Los 10 principales inquilinos representan el 38% de los ingresos por alquiler totales
  • Tamaño de arrendamiento promedio: 45,000 pies cuadrados
  • Tasa de ocupación: 93.4%
  • Tasas de alquiler en el área metropolitana de DC: $ 55.23 por pie cuadrado

Métricas de diversidad de inquilinos

Relación de concentración del inquilino: 0.62, que indica una dependencia moderada entre los segmentos de los clientes.



JBG Smith Properties (JBGS) - Las cinco fuerzas de Porter: rivalidad competitiva

Panorama competitivo en el mercado inmobiliario metropolitano de Washington DC

A partir de 2024, JBG Smith Properties enfrenta una intensa competencia en el mercado inmobiliario metropolitano de Washington DC. La compañía compite con varios actores clave en la región.

Competidor Capitalización de mercado Propiedades totales
Vornado Realty Trust $ 5.98 mil millones 45 propiedades
Propiedades de Boston $ 15.2 mil millones 192 propiedades
Alexandria Raíces Equities $ 14.3 mil millones 63 propiedades
JBG Smith Properties $ 3.2 mil millones 70 propiedades

Competencia de fideicomiso de inversión inmobiliaria (REIT)

El panorama competitivo incluye múltiples REIT establecidos con una importante presencia del mercado.

  • Número de REIT activos en el área metropolitana de Washington DC: 12
  • Valor inmobiliario comercial total en la región: $ 78.6 mil millones
  • Tasas de vacantes para espacios de oficina: 14.3%
  • Tasas de alquiler promedio por pie cuadrado: $ 55.20

Empresas regionales y nacionales de desarrollo inmobiliario

JBG Smith enfrenta la competencia de empresas de desarrollo inmobiliario tanto regionales como nacionales con capacidades de mercado sustanciales.

Tipo de competencia Número de empresas Valor de desarrollo total
Desarrolladores regionales 37 $ 12.4 mil millones
Desarrolladores nacionales 15 $ 24.7 mil millones

Estrategias de diferenciación

Los factores de diferenciación clave en el mercado competitivo incluyen:

  • Selección de ubicación premium
  • Servicios de propiedad avanzados
  • Estándares de construcción de alta calidad
  • Prácticas de desarrollo sostenible

La investigación de mercado indica que la calidad de ubicación representa el 42% de la valoración de la propiedad en el área metropolitana de Washington DC.



JBG Smith Properties (JBGS) - Las cinco fuerzas de Porter: amenaza de sustitutos

Opciones alternativas de inversión inmobiliaria comercial

A partir del cuarto trimestre de 2023, las opciones alternativas de inversión inmobiliaria comercial incluyen:

Tipo de inversión Tamaño del mercado Retorno anual
Fideicomisos de inversión inmobiliaria (REIT) $ 3.5 billones 10.3%
Fondos de bienes raíces de capital privado $ 1.2 billones 12.5%
Plataformas de crowdfunding $ 2.5 mil millones 8.7%

Tendencias de trabajo remoto emergente

Estadísticas de trabajo remoto que impacta la demanda del espacio de la oficina:

  • 42% de la fuerza laboral de EE. UU. Ahora trabaja híbrida
  • Tasas de ocupación de la oficina al 47.5% de los niveles previos a la pandemia
  • Empresas que reducen el espacio de la oficina en promedio del 20%

Soluciones de espacio de trabajo flexible

Métricas de mercado de espacio de trabajo flexible:

Métrico 2024 proyección
Tamaño del mercado global de espacio de trabajo flexible $ 111.68 mil millones
Tasa de crecimiento anual 17.2%
Cuota de mercado proyectada para 2025 30% del mercado total de oficinas

Alternativas de desarrollo suburbano y urbano

Estadísticas de desarrollo comparativo:

  • Crecimiento del desarrollo de la oficina suburbana: 6.3%
  • Inversión de desarrollo de uso mixto urbano: $ 45.2 mil millones
  • Tasa de vacantes de bienes raíces comerciales suburbanas: 14.5%


JBG Smith Properties (JBGS) - Las cinco fuerzas de Porter: amenaza de nuevos participantes

Altos requisitos de capital para el desarrollo de bienes raíces comerciales

JBG Smith Properties requiere una inversión de capital sustancial para el desarrollo inmobiliario. A partir del cuarto trimestre de 2023, los activos totales de la compañía eran de $ 5.6 mil millones, con inversiones de desarrollo y construcción que alcanzaron los $ 812 millones.

Categoría de inversión de capital Cantidad (en millones)
Adquisición de tierras $342
Costos de construcción $470
Inversión de desarrollo total $812

Entorno regulatorio complejo en el área metropolitana de Washington DC

El área metropolitana de Washington DC presenta desafíos regulatorios significativos para los nuevos participantes.

  • El proceso de aprobación de zonificación toma un promedio de 18-24 meses
  • Costos de cumplimiento estimados: $ 1.2- $ 1.8 millones por proyecto
  • Evaluaciones de impacto ambiental requeridas para el 92% de los desarrollos comerciales

Inversión inicial significativa para la adquisición de tierras

Los costos de adquisición de tierras en el área metropolitana de DC son excepcionalmente altos. Los precios promedio de la tierra por pie cuadrado varían de $ 250 a $ 750, dependiendo de la ubicación.

Ubicación Costo de tierra por pie cuadrado
Downtown DC $750
Suburban Maryland $350
Virginia del norte $450

Las relaciones de mercado establecidas crean barreras de entrada

JBG Smith Properties tiene relaciones profundamente arraigadas con las partes interesadas locales, lo que hace que la entrada al mercado sea un desafío para los nuevos competidores.

  • Más de 50 asociaciones a largo plazo con agencias gubernamentales locales
  • Relaciones existentes con el 78% de los principales contratistas locales
  • Redes de cadena de suministro establecidas valoradas en aproximadamente $ 1.5 mil millones

JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) - Porter's Five Forces: Competitive rivalry

You're looking at the competitive dynamics in the Washington D.C. market, and honestly, the numbers for the office sector tell a tough story right now. The intense rivalry in the D.C. office market is clearly visible when you look at JBG SMITH Properties' Same Store Net Operating Income (SSNOI) growth.

For the three months ended March 31, 2025, JBG SMITH's consolidated portfolio posted a negative 5.5% change in Same Store NOI. This pressure continued into the third quarter; for the three months ended September 30, 2025, SSNOI at JBG SMITH's share decreased 6.7% quarter-over-quarter, landing at $54.1 million. That kind of sustained negative growth signals that landlords are fighting hard for every dollar of rent, which is the definition of high rivalry.

However, JBG SMITH is using its high capital commitment to National Landing as a competitive moat. Approximately 75.0% of JBG SMITH's holdings are concentrated in the National Landing submarket. This area is anchored by major demand drivers like Amazon's headquarters and Virginia Tech's $1 billion Innovation Campus. To reinforce this position, JBG SMITH is actively taking obsolete office stock offline, planning to remove over 1.0 million square feet in National Landing. Furthermore, JBG SMITH is investing $40 million to reposition 2011 Crystal Drive into an amenity-filled hub for its National Landing office tenants.

Direct competition comes from other large, well-capitalized REITs operating in the same geography. We can see the market's perception of these players through their trading multiples as of mid-September 2025. JBG SMITH is trading at a significant premium relative to some peers, which suggests the market values its specific strategy, but it also highlights the established competition.

Company FY 2026 FFO Multiple (Consensus)
JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) 28x
Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) 17.7x
BXP, Inc. (BXP) 10.9x

The data shows JBG SMITH trades at 28x consensus FY 2026 FFO, while Vornado trades at 17.7x and BXP at 10.9x. This valuation gap suggests investors see a difference in asset quality or future prospects, which ties directly into JBG SMITH's differentiation strategy.

JBG SMITH's placemaking strategy is designed to pull assets out of the commodity office space pile. The focus is on cultivating vibrant, amenity-rich, walkable neighborhoods. This focus appears to be yielding some success in leasing, despite the overall market softness. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, JBG SMITH executed approximately 461,000 square feet of office leases at its share. More importantly, second-generation office leases generated an 11.1% rental rate increase on a cash basis for the three months ended September 30, 2025.

The multifamily segment, while still competitive, is showing more resilience than the office sector. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Same Store multifamily portfolio actually saw NOI increase by 0.2%. This contrasts sharply with the negative office NOI growth. Still, the multifamily market faces its own pressures:

  • Q3 2025 Same Store multifamily leased rate was 92.2% occupied.
  • Effective rents on new multifamily leases decreased by 0.8% in Q3 2025.
  • The renewal rate for multifamily in Q3 2025 was 56.3%.

To be fair, the multifamily segment is where JBG SMITH is pivoting capital, selling assets like a 432-unit building in NoMa for $155M in Q2 2025 to fund office acquisitions and buybacks. The overall picture is one of intense competition in office, where differentiation is key to achieving positive rent growth, and a more stable, but still contested, multifamily environment.

Finance: draft 13-week cash view by Friday.

JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of substitutes

The threat of substitutes for JBG SMITH Properties centers on alternatives that fulfill the same need-office space for businesses or rental housing for residents-but come from outside the traditional commercial real estate sector. This is a significant pressure point in the current market, especially for the commercial portfolio.

Office-to-residential conversion is a major substitute for traditional office space. When an office building is converted, it permanently removes that square footage from the office supply, effectively substituting a future office tenant with a residential one. This trend is actively reshaping the urban landscape. For context, the current office vacancy rate reported in the city was as high as 23.5 percent, signaling a large pool of potential substitutes for new office construction or leasing. JBG SMITH Properties' operating portfolio as of September 30, 2025, included 21 commercial assets totaling 7.0 million square feet at their share.

Remote and hybrid work models substitute for physical office demand. While mandates are pushing utilization higher, the underlying need for physical space has structurally changed. Data from early 2025 showed the Washington D.C. office occupancy rate hitting a record-high average of 51.5 percent in the last week of January, indicating that over 48 percent of the workforce was still not physically present on peak days. Nationally, hybrid work is the standard, with 66% of US companies offering some form of flexibility as of September 2025, which dampens long-term demand for large, traditional footprints.

Suburban office parks offer a lower-cost substitute for urban core office space. While JBG SMITH Properties is heavily concentrated in the urban-infill National Landing submarket (approximately 75.0% of holdings), tenants facing cost pressures may look outside the core. Older data from Q2 2023 illustrated a substantial price gap, with Class A asking rent in Washington D.C. suburbs at approximately $39.29 per square foot compared to the urban core average of $74.01 per square foot. Even with a flight-to-quality trend, this cost differential remains a powerful substitute consideration for cost-conscious firms.

The residential rental market is substituted by homeownership, though DC affordability is a barrier. For JBG SMITH Properties' multifamily segment, the alternative is tenants purchasing a home. However, high entry costs in the D.C. area keep many renters in the market. While US asking rents cooled to $1,599 in January 2025, which is 6.2% below the August 2022 peak of $1,700, the overall cost of buying remains a hurdle for many, supporting rental demand. The threat is mitigated by the high cost of entry into the ownership market.

Office conversion of 550,000 square feet by JBG SMITH mitigates this threat internally. JBG SMITH Properties is proactively addressing the office substitution threat by becoming a source of residential supply. They secured approval to convert two vacant office buildings totaling 550,000 square feet in Arlington, Virginia, into a 195-unit apartment community and a 344-key hotel, with construction expected to start by the end of 2025. This move turns a liability (obsolete office space) into an asset class (multifamily/hospitality) that faces a different set of substitutes.

Here's a quick look at the key market dynamics influencing the threat of substitutes:

  • DC Metro Total Office Vacancy (Q3 2025): 18.0%.
  • Trophy Office Vacancy (Q3 2025): 10.2%.
  • JBG SMITH Office Portfolio Size (Q3 2025): 7.0 million square feet.
  • JBG SMITH Conversion Project Size: 550,000 square feet.
  • US Average Asking Rent (January 2025): $1,599.

We can map the primary substitutes and their associated risks to JBG SMITH Properties' core segments:

Substitute Type JBG SMITH Affected Segment Observed Market Pressure/Metric
Office-to-Residential Conversion Commercial (Office) DC City Office Vacancy: 23.5%
Hybrid/Remote Work Commercial (Office) DC Office Occupancy (Jan 2025): 51.5%
Suburban Office Space Commercial (Office) DC CBD Class A Vacancy (Q1 2025): 18.5%
Homeownership Multifamily (Rental) US Rents 6.2% below 2022 peak

JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of new entrants

You're looking at the barriers to entry in the Washington, DC, real estate development space, especially for a specialized submarket like National Landing. Honestly, the threat from new entrants is quite low, and that's largely because the sheer scale of capital required is a massive hurdle. To compete here, you need deep pockets and a long-term view, something JBG SMITH Properties has demonstrated with its total development pipeline approaching 19 million square feet across the DC region.

The regulatory environment itself acts as a significant moat. Navigating zoning, approvals, and the complex public-private partnerships required for large-scale, mixed-use transformation-like the $12 billion in combined public and private infrastructure enhancements in National Landing-is a specialized skill set. For instance, JBG SMITH recently secured approval from Arlington County to convert over 550,000 square feet of vacant office space into new residential and hotel uses, showcasing their ability to work within the local policy framework, including their success with adaptive reuse projects where they've already transformed space for over 1,300 units.

JBG SMITH holds a unique position because of the sheer size of its controlled assets in the key growth area. While the prompt suggests a pipeline of 8.7 million square feet, what we can confirm is that JBG SMITH controls 8.2 million square feet of additional development density in National Landing alone, anchored by major entities like Amazon and the $1 billion Virginia Tech Innovation Campus. This level of control over future density, combined with existing assets like 5.6 million square feet of office space, creates an integrated platform that new players can't easily replicate.

Also, the cost of land acquisition in prime, Metro-served submarkets is prohibitive for smaller firms. You're not just buying dirt; you're buying into a master-planned ecosystem. New entrants face difficulty competing with established, integrated placemaking platforms like JBG SMITH Properties. Their in-house team of designers, planners, and retail experts focuses on the '20 feet of sidewalk and 20 feet of street façade,' creating curated street experiences that drive sales velocity and rent growth-a level of holistic development that takes years, if not decades, to build. It's about more than just construction; it's about creating a cohesive 'New City' market.

Here's a quick look at the scale that deters competition:

  • Total JBG SMITH development pipeline: nearly 19 million square feet.
  • Additional development density controlled in National Landing: 8.2 million square feet.
  • Existing/under construction multifamily units in National Landing: 4,223.
  • Total infrastructure investment in National Landing: $12 billion.
  • WMATA FY2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program: $11.1 billion.

The financial commitment needed to even begin to match this scale is staggering. Consider the capital required just for public transit backbone maintenance, where the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's (Metro) FY2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program totals $11.1 billion. That's the public side; the private side demands similar commitment for projects like the $1 billion Virginia Tech Innovation Campus.

Metric Value Context
Total Development Pipeline (DC Region) 19 million square feet Scale of future projects across the region.
Controlled Additional Development Density (National Landing) 8.2 million square feet Density JBG SMITH controls for future build-out.
Office Space Conversion Approved (Recent) 550,000 square feet Scale of recent adaptive reuse project approval.
Completed Adaptive Reuse Units (To Date) Over 1,300 units Track record in navigating regulatory conversion programs.
Total Infrastructure Investment (National Landing) $12 billion Public and private funds enhancing the submarket.

The barriers to entry are structural, not just financial. New entrants must contend with JBG SMITH's established relationships and their proven ability to execute complex, multi-faceted placemaking strategies. They've already delivered nearly 1,600 new apartments in National Landing since 2024, with properties like The Grace and Reva achieving over 80% leased status. That kind of immediate, high-demand absorption signals a market that is already being shaped by an incumbent leader.


Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.