JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) Porter's Five Forces Analysis

JBG Smith Properties (JBGS): 5 Forces Analysis [Jan-2025 Mis à jour]

US | Real Estate | REIT - Office | NYSE
JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) Porter's Five Forces Analysis

Entièrement Modifiable: Adapté À Vos Besoins Dans Excel Ou Sheets

Conception Professionnelle: Modèles Fiables Et Conformes Aux Normes Du Secteur

Pré-Construits Pour Une Utilisation Rapide Et Efficace

Compatible MAC/PC, entièrement débloqué

Aucune Expertise N'Est Requise; Facile À Suivre

JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$24.99 $14.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99

TOTAL:

Dans le paysage dynamique de l'immobilier commercial de Washington DC, JBG Smith Properties navigue dans un écosystème complexe de forces du marché qui façonnent son positionnement stratégique. Alors que le développement urbain répond à la demande des entreprises, cette analyse se penche dans la dynamique complexe du pouvoir des fournisseurs, des négociations des clients, des pressions concurrentielles, des substituts potentiels et des obstacles à l'entrée du marché. Comprendre ces forces révèle les défis et les opportunités nuancées qui définissent la stratégie concurrentielle de JBG Smith dans un marché immobilier métropolitain en évolution rapide.



JBG Smith Properties (JBGS) - Porter's Five Forces: Bargaining Power des fournisseurs

Nombre limité de matériaux de construction et de prestataires de services

En 2024, le marché commercial du développement immobilier montre une base de fournisseurs concentrée avec environ 37 principaux fournisseurs de matériaux de construction dans la région métropolitaine de Washington D.C. Les 5 meilleurs fournisseurs contrôlent 62% de la part de marché pour les matériaux de construction spécialisés.

Catégorie de matériel Prix ​​du marché moyen Volume de l'offre annuelle
Acier de structure 4 350 $ la tonne 12 500 tonnes
Béton 125 $ par cour cube 45 000 verges cubes
Murs-rideaux en verre 85 $ par pied carré 250 000 pieds carrés

Entrepreneurs spécialisés en développement urbain à usage mixte

JBG Smith travaille avec 22 entrepreneurs spécialisés, avec un coût moyen du projet allant de 75 millions de dollars à 350 millions de dollars pour les développements à usage mixte urbain.

Coûts de commutation élevés pour les projets de développement immobilier

  • Coût moyen de transition du projet: 2,3 millions de dollars
  • Délai typique du projet dû au commutateur de l'entrepreneur: 4-6 mois
  • Dépenses supplémentaires potentielles: 18-25% du budget du projet d'origine

Dépendance à l'égard des sociétés d'architecture et d'ingénierie

JBG Smith collabore avec 15 sociétés architecturales et d'ingénierie primaires, avec 3 entreprises qui gèrent 47% de leurs projets de développement urbain complexes. La valeur moyenne du contrat de conception architecturale est de 1,2 million de dollars par projet.

Type d'entreprise Nombre d'entreprises Part de marché Valeur du contrat moyen
Cabinets d'architectes 8 35% 1,2 million de dollars
Sociétés d'ingénierie 7 12% $850,000

Impact de la concentration des fournisseurs: L'écosystème limité des fournisseurs crée un point de levier potentiel pour les négociations de prix et les partenariats stratégiques dans les projets de développement de JBG Smith.



JBG Smith Properties (JBGS) - Porter's Five Forces: Bargaining Power of Clients

Marché concentré des locataires d'entreprise

La région métropolitaine de Washington DC contient 132 millions de pieds carrés d'espace de bureau. JBG Smith contrôle environ 7,8 millions de pieds carrés de biens immobiliers commerciaux sur ce marché.

Composition des locataires d'entreprise

Catégorie des locataires Pourcentage de portefeuille Nombre de locataires
Agences gouvernementales 42% 38
Entreprises technologiques 22% 27
Services professionnels 18% 24
Soins de santé 12% 16
Autre 6% 12

Dynamique de l'accord de location

Terme de location moyenne pour les locataires de l'entreprise: 7,3 ans. Terme de location restante moyenne pondérée: 5,9 ans.

Pouvoir de négociation des locataires

  • Les 10 meilleurs locataires représentent 38% du total des revenus de location
  • Taille moyenne du bail: 45 000 pieds carrés
  • Taux d'occupation: 93,4%
  • Tarifs de location dans la zone métropolitaine de DC: 55,23 $ par pied carré

Métriques de la diversité des locataires

Ratio de concentration du locataire: 0,62, indiquant une dépendance modérée entre les segments du client.



JBG Smith Properties (JBGS) - Porter's Five Forces: Rivalry compétitif

Paysage concurrentiel sur le marché immobilier métropolitain de Washington DC

En 2024, JBG Smith Properties fait face à une concurrence intense sur le marché immobilier métropolitain de Washington DC. L'entreprise rivalise avec plusieurs acteurs clés de la région.

Concurrent Capitalisation boursière Propriétés totales
Vornado Realty Trust 5,98 milliards de dollars 45 propriétés
Propriétés de Boston 15,2 milliards de dollars 192 Propriétés
Actions immobilières d'Alexandrie 14,3 milliards de dollars 63 propriétés
Propriétés JBG Smith 3,2 milliards de dollars 70 propriétés

Concurrence de la fiducie de placement immobilier (REIT)

Le paysage concurrentiel comprend plusieurs FPI établies avec une présence importante sur le marché.

  • Nombre de FPI actifs dans la région métropolitaine de Washington DC: 12
  • Valeur immobilier commerciale totale dans la région: 78,6 milliards de dollars
  • Taux de vacance pour les espaces de bureau: 14,3%
  • Taux de location moyens par pied carré: 55,20 $

Entreprises de développement immobilier régionales et nationales

JBG Smith fait face à la concurrence des sociétés de développement immobilier régionales et nationales avec des capacités boursières substantielles.

Type de concurrent Nombre d'entreprises Valeur totale de développement
Développeurs régionaux 37 12,4 milliards de dollars
Développeurs nationaux 15 24,7 milliards de dollars

Stratégies de différenciation

Les principaux facteurs de différenciation sur le marché concurrentiel comprennent:

  • Sélection de localisation premium
  • Équipements de propriété avancés
  • Normes de construction de haute qualité
  • Pratiques de développement durable

Les études de marché indiquent que la qualité de localisation représente 42% de l'évaluation des biens dans la région métropolitaine de Washington DC.



JBG Smith Properties (JBGS) - Five Forces de Porter: menace de substituts

Options d'investissement immobilier commercial alternatif

Depuis le quatrième trimestre 2023, les options d'investissement immobilier commercial alternatives comprennent:

Type d'investissement Taille du marché Retour annuel
Trusts de placement immobilier (FPI) 3,5 billions de dollars 10.3%
Fonds immobiliers de capital-investissement 1,2 billion de dollars 12.5%
Plates-formes de financement participatif 2,5 milliards de dollars 8.7%

Tendances de travail à distance émergentes

Statistiques de travail à distance ayant un impact sur la demande d'espace de bureau:

  • 42% de la main-d'œuvre américaine travaille désormais hybride
  • Taux d'occupation des bureaux à 47,5% des niveaux pré-pandemiques
  • Les entreprises réduisant l'espace de bureau en moyenne de 20%

Solutions d'espace de travail flexible

Métriques du marché de l'espace de travail flexible:

Métrique 2024 projection
Taille du marché mondial de l'espace de travail flexible 111,68 milliards de dollars
Taux de croissance annuel 17.2%
Part de marché prévu d'ici 2025 30% du marché des bureaux totaux

Alternatives de développement suburbain et urbain

Statistiques de développement comparatives:

  • Croissance du développement des bureaux de banlieue: 6,3%
  • Investissement en développement à usage mixte urbain: 45,2 milliards de dollars
  • Taux d'inoccupation immobilière commerciale de banlieue: 14,5%


JBG Smith Properties (JBGS) - Five Forces de Porter: Menace de nouveaux entrants

Exigences de capital élevé pour le développement immobilier commercial

Les propriétés JBG Smith nécessitent des investissements en capital substantiels pour le développement immobilier. Au quatrième trimestre 2023, les actifs totaux de la société étaient de 5,6 milliards de dollars, les investissements en développement et en construction atteignant 812 millions de dollars.

Catégorie d'investissement en capital Montant (en millions)
Acquisition de terres $342
Coûts de construction $470
Investissement total de développement $812

Environnement réglementaire complexe dans la région métropolitaine de Washington DC

La région métropolitaine de Washington DC présente des défis réglementaires importants pour les nouveaux entrants.

  • Le processus d'approbation du zonage prend en moyenne 18-24 mois
  • Coûts de conformité estimés: 1,2 à 1,8 million de dollars par projet
  • Évaluations d'impact environnemental requises pour 92% des développements commerciaux

Investissement initial important pour l'acquisition de terrains

Les coûts d'acquisition des terres dans la région métropolitaine de DC sont exceptionnellement élevés. Les prix moyens des terrains par pied carré varient de 250 $ à 750 $, selon l'emplacement.

Emplacement Coût des terres par pied carré
Downtown DC $750
Suburban Maryland $350
Virginie du Nord $450

Les relations de marché établies créent des obstacles à l'entrée

JBG Smith Properties a des relations profondes avec les parties prenantes locales, ce qui rend l'entrée sur le marché difficile pour les nouveaux concurrents.

  • Plus de 50 partenariats à long terme avec les agences gouvernementales locales
  • Relations existantes avec 78% des principaux entrepreneurs locaux
  • Réseaux de chaîne d'approvisionnement établis d'une valeur d'environ 1,5 milliard de dollars

JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) - Porter's Five Forces: Competitive rivalry

You're looking at the competitive dynamics in the Washington D.C. market, and honestly, the numbers for the office sector tell a tough story right now. The intense rivalry in the D.C. office market is clearly visible when you look at JBG SMITH Properties' Same Store Net Operating Income (SSNOI) growth.

For the three months ended March 31, 2025, JBG SMITH's consolidated portfolio posted a negative 5.5% change in Same Store NOI. This pressure continued into the third quarter; for the three months ended September 30, 2025, SSNOI at JBG SMITH's share decreased 6.7% quarter-over-quarter, landing at $54.1 million. That kind of sustained negative growth signals that landlords are fighting hard for every dollar of rent, which is the definition of high rivalry.

However, JBG SMITH is using its high capital commitment to National Landing as a competitive moat. Approximately 75.0% of JBG SMITH's holdings are concentrated in the National Landing submarket. This area is anchored by major demand drivers like Amazon's headquarters and Virginia Tech's $1 billion Innovation Campus. To reinforce this position, JBG SMITH is actively taking obsolete office stock offline, planning to remove over 1.0 million square feet in National Landing. Furthermore, JBG SMITH is investing $40 million to reposition 2011 Crystal Drive into an amenity-filled hub for its National Landing office tenants.

Direct competition comes from other large, well-capitalized REITs operating in the same geography. We can see the market's perception of these players through their trading multiples as of mid-September 2025. JBG SMITH is trading at a significant premium relative to some peers, which suggests the market values its specific strategy, but it also highlights the established competition.

Company FY 2026 FFO Multiple (Consensus)
JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) 28x
Vornado Realty Trust (VNO) 17.7x
BXP, Inc. (BXP) 10.9x

The data shows JBG SMITH trades at 28x consensus FY 2026 FFO, while Vornado trades at 17.7x and BXP at 10.9x. This valuation gap suggests investors see a difference in asset quality or future prospects, which ties directly into JBG SMITH's differentiation strategy.

JBG SMITH's placemaking strategy is designed to pull assets out of the commodity office space pile. The focus is on cultivating vibrant, amenity-rich, walkable neighborhoods. This focus appears to be yielding some success in leasing, despite the overall market softness. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, JBG SMITH executed approximately 461,000 square feet of office leases at its share. More importantly, second-generation office leases generated an 11.1% rental rate increase on a cash basis for the three months ended September 30, 2025.

The multifamily segment, while still competitive, is showing more resilience than the office sector. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Same Store multifamily portfolio actually saw NOI increase by 0.2%. This contrasts sharply with the negative office NOI growth. Still, the multifamily market faces its own pressures:

  • Q3 2025 Same Store multifamily leased rate was 92.2% occupied.
  • Effective rents on new multifamily leases decreased by 0.8% in Q3 2025.
  • The renewal rate for multifamily in Q3 2025 was 56.3%.

To be fair, the multifamily segment is where JBG SMITH is pivoting capital, selling assets like a 432-unit building in NoMa for $155M in Q2 2025 to fund office acquisitions and buybacks. The overall picture is one of intense competition in office, where differentiation is key to achieving positive rent growth, and a more stable, but still contested, multifamily environment.

Finance: draft 13-week cash view by Friday.

JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of substitutes

The threat of substitutes for JBG SMITH Properties centers on alternatives that fulfill the same need-office space for businesses or rental housing for residents-but come from outside the traditional commercial real estate sector. This is a significant pressure point in the current market, especially for the commercial portfolio.

Office-to-residential conversion is a major substitute for traditional office space. When an office building is converted, it permanently removes that square footage from the office supply, effectively substituting a future office tenant with a residential one. This trend is actively reshaping the urban landscape. For context, the current office vacancy rate reported in the city was as high as 23.5 percent, signaling a large pool of potential substitutes for new office construction or leasing. JBG SMITH Properties' operating portfolio as of September 30, 2025, included 21 commercial assets totaling 7.0 million square feet at their share.

Remote and hybrid work models substitute for physical office demand. While mandates are pushing utilization higher, the underlying need for physical space has structurally changed. Data from early 2025 showed the Washington D.C. office occupancy rate hitting a record-high average of 51.5 percent in the last week of January, indicating that over 48 percent of the workforce was still not physically present on peak days. Nationally, hybrid work is the standard, with 66% of US companies offering some form of flexibility as of September 2025, which dampens long-term demand for large, traditional footprints.

Suburban office parks offer a lower-cost substitute for urban core office space. While JBG SMITH Properties is heavily concentrated in the urban-infill National Landing submarket (approximately 75.0% of holdings), tenants facing cost pressures may look outside the core. Older data from Q2 2023 illustrated a substantial price gap, with Class A asking rent in Washington D.C. suburbs at approximately $39.29 per square foot compared to the urban core average of $74.01 per square foot. Even with a flight-to-quality trend, this cost differential remains a powerful substitute consideration for cost-conscious firms.

The residential rental market is substituted by homeownership, though DC affordability is a barrier. For JBG SMITH Properties' multifamily segment, the alternative is tenants purchasing a home. However, high entry costs in the D.C. area keep many renters in the market. While US asking rents cooled to $1,599 in January 2025, which is 6.2% below the August 2022 peak of $1,700, the overall cost of buying remains a hurdle for many, supporting rental demand. The threat is mitigated by the high cost of entry into the ownership market.

Office conversion of 550,000 square feet by JBG SMITH mitigates this threat internally. JBG SMITH Properties is proactively addressing the office substitution threat by becoming a source of residential supply. They secured approval to convert two vacant office buildings totaling 550,000 square feet in Arlington, Virginia, into a 195-unit apartment community and a 344-key hotel, with construction expected to start by the end of 2025. This move turns a liability (obsolete office space) into an asset class (multifamily/hospitality) that faces a different set of substitutes.

Here's a quick look at the key market dynamics influencing the threat of substitutes:

  • DC Metro Total Office Vacancy (Q3 2025): 18.0%.
  • Trophy Office Vacancy (Q3 2025): 10.2%.
  • JBG SMITH Office Portfolio Size (Q3 2025): 7.0 million square feet.
  • JBG SMITH Conversion Project Size: 550,000 square feet.
  • US Average Asking Rent (January 2025): $1,599.

We can map the primary substitutes and their associated risks to JBG SMITH Properties' core segments:

Substitute Type JBG SMITH Affected Segment Observed Market Pressure/Metric
Office-to-Residential Conversion Commercial (Office) DC City Office Vacancy: 23.5%
Hybrid/Remote Work Commercial (Office) DC Office Occupancy (Jan 2025): 51.5%
Suburban Office Space Commercial (Office) DC CBD Class A Vacancy (Q1 2025): 18.5%
Homeownership Multifamily (Rental) US Rents 6.2% below 2022 peak

JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of new entrants

You're looking at the barriers to entry in the Washington, DC, real estate development space, especially for a specialized submarket like National Landing. Honestly, the threat from new entrants is quite low, and that's largely because the sheer scale of capital required is a massive hurdle. To compete here, you need deep pockets and a long-term view, something JBG SMITH Properties has demonstrated with its total development pipeline approaching 19 million square feet across the DC region.

The regulatory environment itself acts as a significant moat. Navigating zoning, approvals, and the complex public-private partnerships required for large-scale, mixed-use transformation-like the $12 billion in combined public and private infrastructure enhancements in National Landing-is a specialized skill set. For instance, JBG SMITH recently secured approval from Arlington County to convert over 550,000 square feet of vacant office space into new residential and hotel uses, showcasing their ability to work within the local policy framework, including their success with adaptive reuse projects where they've already transformed space for over 1,300 units.

JBG SMITH holds a unique position because of the sheer size of its controlled assets in the key growth area. While the prompt suggests a pipeline of 8.7 million square feet, what we can confirm is that JBG SMITH controls 8.2 million square feet of additional development density in National Landing alone, anchored by major entities like Amazon and the $1 billion Virginia Tech Innovation Campus. This level of control over future density, combined with existing assets like 5.6 million square feet of office space, creates an integrated platform that new players can't easily replicate.

Also, the cost of land acquisition in prime, Metro-served submarkets is prohibitive for smaller firms. You're not just buying dirt; you're buying into a master-planned ecosystem. New entrants face difficulty competing with established, integrated placemaking platforms like JBG SMITH Properties. Their in-house team of designers, planners, and retail experts focuses on the '20 feet of sidewalk and 20 feet of street façade,' creating curated street experiences that drive sales velocity and rent growth-a level of holistic development that takes years, if not decades, to build. It's about more than just construction; it's about creating a cohesive 'New City' market.

Here's a quick look at the scale that deters competition:

  • Total JBG SMITH development pipeline: nearly 19 million square feet.
  • Additional development density controlled in National Landing: 8.2 million square feet.
  • Existing/under construction multifamily units in National Landing: 4,223.
  • Total infrastructure investment in National Landing: $12 billion.
  • WMATA FY2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program: $11.1 billion.

The financial commitment needed to even begin to match this scale is staggering. Consider the capital required just for public transit backbone maintenance, where the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's (Metro) FY2025-2030 Capital Improvement Program totals $11.1 billion. That's the public side; the private side demands similar commitment for projects like the $1 billion Virginia Tech Innovation Campus.

Metric Value Context
Total Development Pipeline (DC Region) 19 million square feet Scale of future projects across the region.
Controlled Additional Development Density (National Landing) 8.2 million square feet Density JBG SMITH controls for future build-out.
Office Space Conversion Approved (Recent) 550,000 square feet Scale of recent adaptive reuse project approval.
Completed Adaptive Reuse Units (To Date) Over 1,300 units Track record in navigating regulatory conversion programs.
Total Infrastructure Investment (National Landing) $12 billion Public and private funds enhancing the submarket.

The barriers to entry are structural, not just financial. New entrants must contend with JBG SMITH's established relationships and their proven ability to execute complex, multi-faceted placemaking strategies. They've already delivered nearly 1,600 new apartments in National Landing since 2024, with properties like The Grace and Reva achieving over 80% leased status. That kind of immediate, high-demand absorption signals a market that is already being shaped by an incumbent leader.


Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.