Hess Midstream LP (HESM) PESTLE Analysis

Hess Midstream LP (HESM): PESTLE Analysis [Nov-2025 Updated]

US | Energy | Oil & Gas Midstream | NYSE
Hess Midstream LP (HESM) PESTLE Analysis

Fully Editable: Tailor To Your Needs In Excel Or Sheets

Professional Design: Trusted, Industry-Standard Templates

Investor-Approved Valuation Models

MAC/PC Compatible, Fully Unlocked

No Expertise Is Needed; Easy To Follow

Hess Midstream LP (HESM) Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$24.99 $14.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99

TOTAL:

If you're betting on Hess Midstream LP (HESM), you know the midstream business is built on predictability, but external forces are defintely making that stability harder to earn. The good news is HESM's fee-based structure is holding up, projecting a strong 2025 Adjusted EBITDA near $1.24 billion and supporting a unit distribution of about $2.65. Still, the real challenge isn't demand; it's the escalating cost of compliance-political uncertainty and stricter environmental mandates are the new capital expenditure drivers. We need to map those near-term risks and opportunities across the Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental (PESTLE) framework to understand exactly where HESM has to spend money to keep delivering that predictable cash flow.

Hess Midstream LP (HESM) - PESTLE Analysis: Political factors

Federal regulatory uncertainty following the 2024 US election cycle.

You need to understand that the federal regulatory landscape for midstream energy shifted dramatically in 2025 following the US election. While the new administration signaled a strong push for energy dominance, which is generally positive for Hess Midstream LP (HESM), the immediate effect was a period of uncertainty as policies were reversed or put on hold. For instance, two key Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) rules-one on carbon dioxide (CO2) pipelines and another on methane emissions-were left in limbo by a presidential order in January 2025, creating regulatory ambiguity for new projects.

The new administration's executive orders, however, aim to expedite permitting for energy infrastructure, directing agencies to identify and use emergency authorities to speed up approvals for domestic energy resources. This is a clear opportunity, but the industry remains cautious. Honestly, despite the friendlier political rhetoric, many US midstream operators are in a wait-and-see mode for new greenfield projects due to market volatility, preferring to acquire existing assets instead of starting new, complex builds.

Stable, supportive state-level regulatory environment in North Dakota's Bakken region.

The state-level political environment in North Dakota is a massive counterweight to federal uncertainty, providing a bedrock of stability for Hess Midstream's core operations in the Bakken and Three Forks Shale plays. The state has built a pragmatic, business-friendly regulatory framework that prioritizes speed and predictability. This is critical for HESM's ongoing capital program.

Here's the quick math on North Dakota's efficiency:

  • Drilling Permit Fee: A modest $100, compared to $12,500 in a state like Pennsylvania.
  • Permit Approval Time: Typically granted in 20 to 30 days.

Plus, North Dakota is actively using state tax policy to incentivize midstream infrastructure for Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU), which is vital for the long-term viability of the Bakken. The state's Legacy Fund, a sovereign-wealth-style savings account, held about $11.5 billion as of early 2025, demonstrating fiscal strength that underpins infrastructure support.

Geopolitical risk remains low due to focus on domestic US energy infrastructure.

Since Hess Midstream LP is a fee-based company operating exclusively in the Williston Basin area of North Dakota, its exposure to international geopolitical risk is inherently low. The company is a key part of the US domestic energy supply chain, which the current federal administration is actively promoting. This focus on domestic energy production, in a basin that has been crucial in making the US a net energy exporter, insulates HESM from the kind of political instability that plagues companies with significant overseas operations.

However, a major corporate political shift occurred in 2025 that affects HESM's internal governance and strategic alignment. The merger of Hess Corporation with Chevron Corporation was completed in July 2025, resulting in Chevron beneficially owning approximately 37.8% of Hess Midstream. This change in the primary sponsor and major customer, while domestic, is a significant political factor that will shape future capital decisions and commercial agreements.

Potential for new federal pipeline permitting hurdles slowing expansion projects.

Despite the pro-energy rhetoric from the federal government, the risk of permitting hurdles still exists, especially concerning environmental litigation under laws like the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Hess Midstream's own risk disclosures highlight the challenge in obtaining or maintaining permits necessary for capital projects.

We saw a concrete impact of project risk in the company's 2025 guidance. Hess Midstream LP reduced its full year 2025 capital expenditure (CapEx) guidance to approximately $270 million, down from the initial guidance of $300 million. This reduction was due to the suspension of the Capa gas plant project, removing it from the forward plan. This is a clear example of how project-based risk-whether due to permitting delays, costs, or strategic realignment-can directly impact CapEx and growth plans.

2025 Political/Regulatory Impact Factor HESM Financial/Operational Data (2025) Actionable Insight
Federal Regulatory Uncertainty (Post-Election) PHMSA Methane/CO2 rules in limbo (Jan 2025). Executive Orders for expedited permitting issued (Feb 2025). Monitor PHMSA/EPA rule finalization; focus on projects that benefit from accelerated federal permitting.
State-Level Regulatory Stability (North Dakota) Drilling permit cost: $100. State Legacy Fund: $11.5 billion (early 2025). Capitalize on low regulatory friction; prioritize Bakken CapEx over other regions.
Pipeline Permitting Hurdles/Project Risk Full-year CapEx guidance reduced to approximately $270 million (from $300 million) due to Capa gas plant suspension. Factor high project-execution risk into DCF models; prefer smaller, incremental expansions over large greenfield plants.
Major Corporate Political Shift Chevron Corporation now owns approximately 37.8% of HESM after the July 2025 merger with Hess Corporation. Anticipate a strategic review of long-term commercial agreements and capital allocation under new Chevron-influenced governance.

Hess Midstream LP (HESM) - PESTLE Analysis: Economic factors

Projected 2025 Adjusted EBITDA of approximately $1.24 billion, driven by fixed-fee contracts.

Hess Midstream LP's economic stability is fundamentally rooted in its fee-based business model, which insulates it from direct commodity price volatility. For the 2025 fiscal year, the company reaffirmed its full-year Adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) guidance range of $1,235 million to $1,285 million, with the lower end being approximately $1.24 billion.

This strong earnings forecast, representing an approximate 11% increase at the midpoint compared to 2024, is supported by long-term, fixed-fee commercial contracts. About 85% of Hess Midstream's revenues are protected by Minimum Volume Commitments (MVCs), which means producers must pay for a minimum amount of capacity even if they don't use it. That's a rock-solid foundation for cash flow.

2025 Financial Metric (Guidance Midpoint) Value Key Driver
Adjusted EBITDA $1,260 million Fixed-fee contracts and volume growth
Net Income $740 million (Range: $715M - $765M) Increased throughput volumes
Capital Expenditures Approximately $270 million (Updated) Expansion of gas compression and pipeline infrastructure

Distribution growth targeted at 5% annually, likely resulting in a 2025 distribution of around $2.65 per unit.

You can defintely count on Hess Midstream's commitment to shareholder returns. The company targets annual distribution per Class A share growth of at least 5% through 2027, fully funded by Adjusted Free Cash Flow. This consistent growth is a key part of their financial strategy, utilizing excess cash flow beyond the targeted distribution.

The actual distribution rate for the third quarter of 2025 was declared at $0.7548 per Class A share. Annualizing this most recent rate gives a 2025 distribution of approximately $3.02 per unit. This is significantly higher than the minimum 5% annual growth target and reflects the impact of accretive unit repurchases completed throughout the year.

Higher interest rates increase the cost of capital for future expansion debt financing.

The current high interest rate environment in the U.S. definitely raises the cost of capital, especially for future debt-financed expansion projects. For midstream companies, this means new infrastructure build-outs become more expensive. Hess Midstream, however, has managed its debt well. In February 2025, they issued $800.0 million of senior unsecured notes at a fixed rate of 5.875% due in 2028, giving us a concrete example of their cost of debt.

The good news is that S&P upgraded the company's senior unsecured debt to an investment grade rating of BBB- in July 2025, which helps keep borrowing costs lower than for non-investment-grade peers. The company is also focused on financial strength, expecting its leverage ratio (Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA) to decrease to below its long-term target of 3.0x by the end of 2025.

Stable Bakken production volumes support contracted minimum volume commitments (MVCs).

Bakken production volumes are the lifeblood of Hess Midstream's business. While the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) forecasted Bakken crude oil production at around 1.18 million barrels per day (b/d) in 2025, drilling activity has slowed, with rig counts dropping to a five-year low of around 30-35 by mid-2025. This stagnation in overall regional production would typically be a risk, but HESM's contract structure mitigates it.

The company's reliance on MVCs means that even with a slight slowdown in the basin's overall output, Hess Midstream's revenue stream remains predictable. The key economic takeaway here is that the stability of their cash flow is tied to the contract, not the spot price or daily volume fluctuations in the Bakken. This is why their gas processing and gathering systems are expected to represent approximately 75% of total affiliate revenues in 2026 and 2027.

Inflationary pressure on steel, labor, and construction costs for new infrastructure projects.

Inflation is a real headwind for capital projects. Midstream companies are dealing with higher costs for essential materials and labor. Specifically, new or expanded tariffs on steel and aluminum, in some cases doubled to 50%, directly increase the price of line pipe, valves, and other critical infrastructure components. This magnifying effect on project costs is a major concern.

Here's the quick math on the CapEx challenge:

  • Tariffs on imported steel and aluminum are raising material costs for new pipelines.
  • A tight labor market is pushing up construction wages.
  • Hess Midstream's total capital expenditures for 2025 were reduced to approximately $270 million, partly due to the suspension of the Capa gas plant project.

Still, Hess Midstream is partially protected because its existing contracts often have annual fee escalators tied to an inflation measure like the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or Producer Price Index (PPI), which can offset operating cost increases. Finance: Monitor the PPI for steel and construction materials monthly to assess future CapEx risk.

Hess Midstream LP (HESM) - PESTLE Analysis: Social factors

Increasing investor and public pressure for robust Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting.

You're seeing the capital markets shift hard, and Hess Midstream LP (HESM) is right in the crosshairs. ESG is no longer a niche concern; it's a core valuation driver. Institutional investors, especially those managing massive pools of capital like BlackRock, are using ESG metrics to screen investments, which directly impacts HESM's cost of capital and liquidity.

In 2025, the global assets under management (AUM) committed to ESG strategies are projected to be well over $40 trillion. This means HESM's ability to attract this capital hinges on transparent reporting of social factors like safety, workforce diversity, and community impact. The market is demanding quantitative proof, not just glossy reports. If your Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is high, or if your community engagement scores drop, your stock price feels it.

Here's the quick math: a lower ESG rating can increase your weighted average cost of capital (WACC) by 50 to 100 basis points, translating to millions in extra financing costs for major pipeline or facility expansions.

Labor shortages in skilled technical and field operations roles across the US energy sector.

The energy sector is facing a generational talent crunch, and the midstream segment is defintely not immune. HESM operates primarily in the Bakken, a region where competition for skilled labor-welders, pipeline technicians, and control room operators-is fierce. The average age of a skilled field worker in the US oil and gas industry is trending higher, creating a significant knowledge gap as experienced personnel retire.

By 2025, industry estimates suggest that up to 25% of the current US energy workforce could be eligible for retirement within the next few years. This shortage forces HESM to spend more on recruitment, training, and retention bonuses. A single, highly-skilled technician role in the Bakken can cost HESM $15,000 to $20,000 more annually in total compensation compared to a decade ago, just to stay competitive.

This is a supply chain risk for human capital. You need to staff up to maintain the high utilization rates on your assets.

  • Recruit: Focus on military veterans and trade schools.
  • Retain: Offer competitive benefits and clear career paths.
  • Automate: Invest in remote monitoring to reduce field personnel needs.

Community relations are crucial for pipeline routing and facility expansion permits.

For a midstream company like HESM, public perception at the local level is everything. Your ability to get a pipeline routed or a new gas processing facility permitted-especially in the Bakken, which has seen rapid development-depends heavily on maintaining a strong social license to operate (SLO). Local opposition can delay a project by months or even years, ballooning costs and missing critical in-service dates.

For example, a major midstream project delay can add $500,000 to $1 million per month in carrying costs and lost revenue. HESM must proactively engage landowners and local governments in North Dakota and Montana, ensuring they see tangible benefits from the infrastructure, not just risks.

What this estimate hides is the long-term damage to reputation; a single, poorly managed local incident can create a ripple effect across multiple future projects. This isn't a one-time check-the-box exercise.

Shifting public perception on fossil fuel infrastructure requires proactive communication.

The broader societal conversation around climate change and the energy transition directly impacts HESM, even though it's a midstream operator. While HESM's infrastructure is critical for transporting cleaner-burning natural gas, it is still categorized as fossil fuel infrastructure, which faces increasing scrutiny from environmental groups and policymakers.

HESM needs to clearly communicate its role in reducing flaring in the Bakken and its investments in carbon capture readiness or efficiency improvements. They are a necessary bridge to a lower-carbon future. For instance, the reduction in flaring intensity in the Bakken has been a key social and environmental win, and HESM's infrastructure is a major enabler of that progress. The company's communication should focus on the 99%+ gathering efficiency they aim for, translating complex operations into a clear environmental benefit for the public.

This is a strategic communication challenge. You have to tell your story before someone else tells it for you.

Hess Midstream LP (HESM) - PESTLE Analysis: Technological factors

The technological landscape for Hess Midstream LP is defined by a critical need for digital operational control and robust security, which directly supports the goal of increasing throughput while managing environmental risk. The core takeaway is that technology spending is embedded within the 2025 ongoing capital budget, functioning as a necessary operational expenditure (OpEx) to hit volume targets and maintain compliance, not just a growth CapEx line item.

Increased use of Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems for remote monitoring and efficiency.

Hess Midstream's operational efficiency hinges on its Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems, which are the nerve center for its extensive Bakken infrastructure. These systems allow for remote, real-time monitoring of pressure, temperature, flow rates, and equipment status across thousands of miles of gathering and transmission lines. This capability is essential for managing the expected 120 to 130 thousand barrels of water per day (MBbl/d) of water gathering volumes and the oil and gas systems.

The continuous optimization and upgrade of SCADA are funded through the approximately $125 million allocated to ongoing capital expenditures for gathering system well connects and maintenance in the 2025 guidance. Upgraded SCADA allows for predictive maintenance, meaning the company can fix a pump before it fails, which is far cheaper and less disruptive than a reactive repair. It's a classic OpEx optimization play.

Deployment of advanced methane detection technologies for leak prevention and compliance.

The pressure to reduce environmental impact is driving significant technological shifts, particularly in methane detection. Hess Midstream is aligned with its primary customer's goal to achieve zero routine flaring from operated assets by the end of 2025. This ambitious target cannot be met without deploying advanced, continuous monitoring technologies.

While a specific dollar figure for these systems is not broken out, the investment falls under the ongoing capital budget. The technology focus includes continuous emissions monitoring (CEM) sensors and potentially drone- or satellite-based leak detection (LDT) to identify fugitive emissions (unintended gas releases). This proactive deployment is a critical risk mitigation strategy, helping to avoid significant regulatory fines and reputational damage.

  • Action: Implement continuous emissions monitoring (CEM) systems at compressor stations.
  • Goal: Achieve zero routine flaring from operated assets by year-end 2025.
  • Financial Impact: Reduces regulatory risk and potential fines under new EPA methane rules.

Need for significant investment in cybersecurity to protect critical pipeline control systems.

The increasing reliance on SCADA and remote operations creates a larger attack surface, making cybersecurity a paramount technological risk. The midstream sector is a prime target for cyber-attacks, which can disrupt operations, compromise data, and even trigger physical damage. Hess Midstream explicitly identifies the risk of 'cyber-attacks' and 'information technology failures' in its financial filings.

The investment required here is less about physical hardware and more about software, threat intelligence, and personnel training. This spending is a non-negotiable cost of doing business, likely representing a high-priority portion of the $125 million ongoing CapEx. A security breach that shuts down a key pipeline could cost millions in lost revenue and remediation, far outweighing the preventative investment.

Digitalization of field operations to optimize crude oil throughput, projected near 125,000 BOPD.

Digitalization extends beyond SCADA to encompass the entire field workflow, using data analytics to optimize throughput (the volume of product moved). Hess Midstream is guiding for crude oil gathering volumes to average between 120 and 130 thousand barrels per day (MBbl/d) in 2025. This range is precisely around the 125,000 BOPD mark.

Here's the quick math: Hitting the high end of the 130,000 BOPD range requires every part of the system-from the well-pad connections to the main terminal-to operate at peak efficiency. Digital tools are used to:

  • Automate well-pad switching and scheduling.
  • Optimize compressor run-times to reduce energy costs.
  • Streamline maintenance scheduling to minimize downtime.

This operational focus is the direct link between technology investment and revenue growth. The table below summarizes the key operational metrics tied to these technological investments for the 2025 fiscal year.

Metric 2025 Guidance / Target Technological Driver Financial Context
Crude Oil Gathering Volume 120 to 130 MBbl/d SCADA & Digital Field Optimization Supports revenue growth from throughput volumes.
Total Capital Expenditures Approx. $270 million Overall funding for all projects, including tech. Reduced from initial $300 million guidance.
Ongoing Capital Expenditures Approx. $125 million SCADA Upgrades, Maintenance, Cybersecurity Primary budget source for operational technology.
Routine Flaring Target Zero by end of 2025 Advanced Methane Detection Technologies Compliance and environmental risk mitigation.

To be fair, what this estimate hides is the true cost of a sophisticated cybersecurity program, which includes substantial OpEx for software subscriptions and specialized talent, not just the CapEx for hardware. Still, the overall technology focus is clearly on enabling volume growth while defintely reducing operational and environmental liabilities.

Hess Midstream LP (HESM) - PESTLE Analysis: Legal factors

Stricter Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules on methane emissions from oil and gas infrastructure.

The legal landscape for methane emissions is still a moving target in 2025, but the near-term financial risk has been defintely altered. The most significant development is the Congressional action in March 2025 that prohibited the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from collecting the Waste Emissions Charge (WEC) until 2034, despite the charge itself remaining in the Inflation Reduction Act statute. This is a massive reprieve. Without this delay, Hess Midstream LP would have faced a WEC of $1,200/tonne for 2025 methane emissions exceeding the statutory threshold, a cost that would have directly impacted operating expenses.

Still, the core regulations-NSPS OOOOb and EG OOOOc (New Source Performance Standards and Emission Guidelines for new and existing oil and gas sources)-are in effect, though their implementation is under review. The EPA announced in March 2025 it is reconsidering these rules, and in July 2025, it extended compliance deadlines for certain provisions. This creates regulatory uncertainty, but the underlying requirement for enhanced leak detection and repair (LDAR) remains a non-negotiable compliance cost.

Here's a quick look at the shifting methane regulatory environment:

  • Waste Emissions Charge (WEC): Collection prohibited until 2034 by Congress, removing the $1,200/tonne fee for 2025.
  • NSPS OOOOb/EG OOOOc: Compliance deadlines extended in July 2025; rule is currently under EPA reconsideration.
  • Enforcement: A March 2025 memo directed EPA staff to reduce focus on methane enforcement, but this is subject to change.

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) updates to safety and integrity management standards.

Pipeline safety regulations are tightening up, and this means higher capital expenditures for Hess Midstream LP to maintain compliance. The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) distributed a final rule in January 2025 on Gas Pipeline Leak Detection and Repair, which mandates more rigorous leakage surveys and sets performance standards for advanced leak detection programs. This rule also establishes mandatory repair timelines for leaks based on a new grading system.

More critically for Hess Midstream's gas gathering systems, PHMSA issued technical amendments effective July 1, 2025, updating the incorporation by reference of the ASME B31.8S standard for gas pipelines from the 2004 to the 2018 edition. This requires a full review and update of all integrity management plans to align with the newer, more stringent risk assessment and remediation practices. Plus, the proposed PIPELINE Safety Act of 2025, introduced in October 2025, aims to double the maximum civil penalties for safety violations, raising the maximum daily penalty from approximately $200,000 to $400,000 and the maximum for a series of violations from approximately $2 million to $4 million. That's a clear signal on the rising cost of non-compliance.

Ongoing legal challenges related to right-of-way and eminent domain for new pipeline construction.

The legal battles over right-of-way and eminent domain in the Bakken region continue to be a significant headwind for new infrastructure projects. While Hess Midstream LP has a mature footprint, any expansion of its gathering systems, which is a key part of its 2025 capital plan, faces risk from protracted legal disputes with landowners. The total capital expenditures for Hess Midstream LP in 2025 are expected to be approximately $300 million, with a portion allocated to greenfield high-pressure gathering lines and compression expansions, making the right-of-way process a critical path item.

A high-profile case involving North Dakota ranchers and a natural gas pipeline company highlights the financial risk. In August 2025, landowners asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear their case after the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against awarding them legal fees, which amounted to hundreds of thousands of dollars, even though they successfully argued for a fair market price for their land. This ruling creates a massive disincentive for landowners to accept initial low-ball offers, which in turn increases the transaction cost and timeline for midstream companies using eminent domain authority.

Increased scrutiny on compliance with permitting for water usage and disposal in the Bakken.

Water handling is a core part of Hess Midstream LP's business, and it is under increasing regulatory scrutiny, especially concerning disposal. Hess Midstream LP's 2025 guidance projects full year water gathering volumes to average between 120 to 130 thousand barrels ('MBbl') per day. The sheer volume of produced water requires constant compliance with state and federal permitting for gathering and disposal wells.

The financial impact of this compliance is already visible. In the second quarter of 2025, Hess Midstream LP's revenues included $28.0 million of pass-through costs for electricity, produced water trucking, and disposal, an increase from $23.1 million in the prior-year quarter. This rising cost is a direct function of the increasingly complex and costly permitting and disposal requirements. The EPA is also revisiting wastewater rules for oil and gas extraction, which could lead to stricter limits on the quality of water injected into disposal wells or new requirements for beneficial reuse, which would necessitate new capital investment.

The risk of permit revocation or modification is a stated concern for the company, as it could severely disrupt the estimated 120 to 130 MBbl per day of water gathering volume. You need to monitor North Dakota's Department of Environmental Quality (NDDEQ) actions closely.

Legal/Regulatory Factor 2025 Financial/Operational Impact Actionable Insight for HESM
EPA Waste Emissions Charge (WEC) $1,200/tonne fee delayed until 2034 by Congress. Reallocate capital from immediate WEC compliance to PHMSA and LDAR upgrades.
PHMSA Integrity Management Update (ASME B31.8S-2018) Requires immediate update of integrity management plans; increases 2025 capital spending on compliance. Prioritize Q3 2025 compliance plan updates for the July 1, 2025, effective date.
Proposed PHMSA Penalty Increases Maximum civil penalty for a series of violations could double to $4 million. Invest in enhanced risk-based inspection technologies to minimize incident risk.
Bakken Eminent Domain Challenges Increased time and legal costs for new right-of-way acquisition (e.g., for $300 million in 2025 capital projects). Budget for higher land acquisition costs and longer project timelines; consider alternative routing.
Water Disposal Permitting Scrutiny Q2 2025 pass-through disposal costs were $28.0 million, indicating rising operational expense. Accelerate investment in produced water recycling/reuse projects to reduce reliance on disposal wells.

Hess Midstream LP (HESM) - PESTLE Analysis: Environmental factors

You need to understand that environmental compliance isn't just a cost center for Hess Midstream LP; it's a fundamental driver of their midstream infrastructure capital expenditure (CapEx). The near-term risks center on physical climate events and the financial pressure to hit the ambitious decarbonization targets set for the end of this year. We are past the point of treating this as a side project.

The direct takeaway is that HESM is on track to meet its zero routine flaring goal by the end of 2025, a massive compliance win, but one that requires substantial, ongoing investment in gas capture infrastructure. This investment, which is largely baked into the $270 million total 2025 capital expenditure, is a non-negotiable cost of doing business in the Bakken.

Pressure to meet decarbonization goals and reduce the operational carbon footprint

Hess Midstream's strategy is tightly aligned with Hess Corporation's commitment to achieve net zero Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on a net equity basis by 2050. More immediately, the parent company has a 2025 target to reduce operated GHG emission intensity and methane emissions intensity by ~50% each, compared to a 2017 baseline.

This commitment is not abstract; it's tied directly to performance. Hess has linked flare reduction to executive compensation, which defintely drives internal focus. HESM's role is to provide the infrastructure-the pipelines and processing capacity-that makes these reductions possible for both Hess and third-party producers. Their ongoing investment in high-pressure gathering lines and compression projects is the financial manifestation of this decarbonization pressure.

State-level mandates in North Dakota to reduce natural gas flaring require infrastructure investment

North Dakota's regulatory environment has long pushed for greater gas capture, and HESM is responding by targeting a world-class standard. The company is committed to achieving zero routine flaring by the end of 2025, aligning with the World Bank's Zero Routine Flaring by 2030 initiative. This is a critical operational target that ensures HESM can handle the increasing associated gas volumes from Hess's four-rig drilling program.

The infrastructure build-out to eliminate flaring is a major component of the 2025 capital plan. While the total 2025 capital expenditures are now expected to be approximately $270 million (down from an initial $300 million guidance due to project suspension), a significant portion is dedicated to gas gathering and compression. For the full year 2025, the system is expected to handle substantial volumes:

  • Gas Gathering Volumes: 455 to 465 MMcf per day
  • Gas Processing Volumes: 440 to 450 MMcf per day

The ability to process nearly all the gathered gas is the definition of flaring compliance. That's a huge operational lift.

Increased physical risk to assets from extreme weather events, like severe Bakken winters or flooding

The Bakken region presents distinct physical climate risks that directly impact midstream operations and financial results. HESM's Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) process considers the increased severity of acute weather events. We saw this risk materialize in 2025:

  • Winter Impact: Bakken net production in the first quarter of 2025 was negatively impacted by winter weather.
  • Summer Impact: Localized flooding in August 2025 affected gas throughputs in the third quarter.

Adverse weather conditions and related maintenance in the third quarter were cited as key reasons for lowering the full-year 2025 gas throughput guidance in September. These events create volume volatility, which, despite HESM's fee-based contracts, can still affect third-party volumes and operational costs. It's a constant battle to maintain operational uptime in a harsh climate.

Focus on responsible water management and reducing freshwater consumption in processing

Water management, specifically handling produced water (a byproduct of oil and gas extraction), is a core environmental service for HESM. Their integrated system in North Dakota is designed to minimize surface impact and trucking risk. In 2023, HESM gathered and transported approximately 48.7 million barrels (BBL) of produced water, moving 82% of it by pipe. For 2025, the expected water gathering volumes highlight the scale of this operation:

Metric 2025 Full Year Guidance (Midpoint) Environmental Significance
Water Gathering Volumes 125 MBbl per day (120 to 130 MBbl/day range) Managing and disposing of produced water without relying on trucking reduces road traffic, emissions, and spill risk.
Gas Processing Volumes 445 MMcf per day (440 to 450 MMcf/day range) High gas capture rate minimizes flaring and associated greenhouse gas emissions.
Total Capital Expenditures Approximately $270 million Funds the gas compression and gathering infrastructure necessary for flaring reduction.

Here's the quick math on the distribution: a 5% increase on the prior year's rate means HESM must generate enough distributable cash flow to cover the $2.65 per unit payout, which their fee-based structure makes highly predictable. What this estimate hides is the potential for a major regulatory fine or a severe weather event that takes a processing plant offline for an extended period. Still, the core business is rock-solid.

Next step: Finance: Model the impact of a 15% increase in environmental compliance capital expenditure on 2026 free cash flow by the end of the week.


Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.