Oracle Corporation (ORCL): PESTLE Analysis [Nov-2025 Updated]

You're holding a position in Oracle Corporation (ORCL) and wondering if the Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) growth story can outrun the regulatory headwinds and competitive pressure. The answer for fiscal year 2025 isn't simple: Oracle is aggressively integrating Generative AI (GenAI) into its Fusion and NetSuite applications, driving strong demand for cost-saving operational expenditure (OpEx) enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, but they defintely face rising compliance costs from the European Union's Digital Markets Act (DMA) and ongoing antitrust scrutiny over cloud licensing. We need to look past the headlines to see where the real risks and opportunities lie, especially as they commit to powering OCI data centers with 100% renewable energy.

Oracle Corporation (ORCL) - PESTLE Analysis: Political factors

Increased US government scrutiny on cloud security and vendor lock-in

The US government is simultaneously a massive customer and a strict regulator for Oracle Corporation, creating a dual political dynamic. The scrutiny on cloud security, especially after recent incidents, is intense. For instance, in April 2025, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued guidance on credential risks following a potential compromise of a legacy Oracle cloud environment. A separate security incident at Oracle Health (formerly Cerner) in January 2025, involving legacy servers, prompted an FBI investigation and class-action lawsuits, highlighting the pressure to secure all platforms.

On the vendor lock-in front, the government is actively pushing for better terms and easier migration. To be fair, Oracle responded directly to this political pressure. In July 2025, the US General Services Administration (GSA) announced a 'OneGov' agreement with Oracle. This landmark deal offers federal agencies a substantial 75% discount on license-based Oracle Technology Programs, like database and security software, through November 2025. Plus, the agreement eliminates data egress fees for moving workloads from Oracle Government Clouds to other approved FedRAMP/DoD clouds, which defintely reduces the cost and technical friction of switching providers.

Here's the quick math on the GSA deal's impact:

Geopolitical tensions (US/China) affecting supply chain and international sales

The escalating US/China trade conflict presents a significant headwind, primarily by increasing costs and fragmenting the global tech market. The resurgence of hostilities in 2025, marked by threats of 'massive' new tariffs from the US and China's retaliatory export controls on critical materials like rare earths, creates a volatile operating environment. Earlier in the year, cumulative US tariffs on a range of Chinese imports had already reached 125-145%.

This geopolitical friction directly impacts Oracle's supply chain for its Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) build-outs, especially for high-demand components like NVIDIA-powered servers needed for its massive AI cloud deals. Analysts warn that these US tariffs could undermine Big Tech's AI infrastructure investments. Oracle's overall Fiscal Year 2025 total revenues were $57.4 billion, so any disruption to its global operations or access to the Chinese market-which is increasingly difficult for US tech firms-is a material risk.

US Department of Defense and intelligence community cloud contract competition remains high

Competition for the US military and intelligence community's cloud budget is fierce, but Oracle is positioned as a key player. The company is one of four awardees on the multi-billion dollar Joint Warfighting Cloud Capability (JWCC) contract, which has a $9 billion ceiling. This is a massive contract, but they have to compete for every task order against Amazon Web Services, Google, and Microsoft.

Still, Oracle is winning. In April 2025, Oracle announced a firm-fixed price task order through JWCC to provide cloud services to the US Army's Enterprise Cloud Management Agency (ECMA) via its Oracle U.S. Defense Cloud. Looking ahead, the competition is set to intensify further. The Pentagon is already developing a follow-on contract, 'JWCC Next,' which is anticipated to be even larger than the original $9 billion JWCC. This means Oracle must continue to invest heavily in securing its Defense Cloud regions, which cover Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) Impact Levels (IL) 2, 4, 5, and 6.

Data sovereignty and localization policies forcing regional OCI build-outs

Global political trends around data sovereignty-the idea that data is subject to the laws of the nation where it is collected-are forcing Oracle to build out its Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) footprint globally. This is expensive, but it's a non-negotiable cost of doing business with governments and regulated industries worldwide.

The push for data localization, especially in the European Union (EU) and other key markets, requires Oracle to offer sovereign cloud options. Oracle is responding with its distributed cloud strategy, including the smaller-footprint Dedicated Region 25, which brings a full OCI region into a customer's data center to meet strict compliance needs. Oracle's aggressive expansion plans include building 40 new global data centers announced in March 2025, with new Cloud Regions in countries like Oman, Serbia, and Mexico. This capital expenditure is directly driven by political and regulatory requirements. Oracle's Cloud services and license support revenues of $44.0 billion in Fiscal Year 2025 provide the financial muscle for this necessary global build-out.

• Build new Cloud Regions in Oman, Serbia, and Mexico in 2025.
• Plan for 40 new global data centers announced in March 2025.
• Offer EU Sovereign Cloud options using OCI's distributed cloud architecture.

Oracle Corporation (ORCL) - PESTLE Analysis: Economic factors

The economic landscape in Fiscal Year 2025 is a clear tailwind for Oracle Corporation's cloud transition, but it also presents a headwind in traditional segments. You're seeing a classic split: macro uncertainty and high interest rates are crushing big, one-time hardware purchases (CapEx), but that same pressure is forcing companies to embrace the predictable, flexible subscription model (OpEx) where Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and its applications thrive. This is a defintely a strategic advantage for a company that has successfully pivoted to a cloud-first model.

Global corporate IT spending shifting heavily toward operational expenditure (OpEx) models

The shift from Capital Expenditure (CapEx) to Operational Expenditure (OpEx) is no longer a trend; it's the default financial strategy for IT. CFOs prefer OpEx because it turns a large, depreciating asset purchase into a predictable, monthly utility bill, which is easier to manage in an uncertain economy. This is why Oracle's cloud business is accelerating while its traditional license business is slowing down.

For the full Fiscal Year 2025, Oracle's total Cloud services and license support revenue-the core OpEx model-was a massive $44.0 billion, representing a 12% increase in USD. In contrast, the more CapEx-aligned Cloud license and on-premise license revenues only grew by a modest 2% to $5.2 billion for the full year. The market is voting with its wallet, and it is choosing the subscription model.

Here's the quick math on the shift:

• Cloud Services Revenue (OpEx model, FY2025): $44.0 billion.
• Cloud/On-Premise License Revenue (CapEx model, FY2025): $5.2 billion.
• Cloud Services growth rate (FY2025): 12%.

Persistently high interest rates slowing capital expenditure (CapEx) for on-premise hardware

When the cost of borrowing money is high, companies delay large, non-essential CapEx projects, especially for on-premise hardware refreshes. This is a direct headwind for Oracle's legacy business, as evidenced by the decline in traditional license sales. For example, in Q3 FY2025 alone, Cloud license and on-premise license revenues were down 10% in USD, a clear sign that customers are not buying new physical infrastructure.

Still, Oracle itself is bucking the CapEx slowdown where it matters most: its own cloud build-out. To meet the unprecedented demand for AI infrastructure, Oracle is aggressively investing. The company's CFO stated that fiscal year 2025 CapEx was expected to be approximately $13.6 billion, which would be double the previous year's CapEx. This strategic, massive investment in OCI capacity is a necessary cost to capture the future revenue from the OpEx-driven cloud boom.

Strong demand for cost-saving enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems like Fusion and NetSuite

In a high-cost environment, efficiency is king. Companies are prioritizing investments that deliver immediate, measurable cost savings and operational improvements, and this is where Oracle's cloud Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, Fusion and NetSuite, shine. They are seen as essential rather than discretionary spending because they streamline back-office operations.

The growth rates for these core Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) products in FY2025 were exceptional, validating their status as cost-saving enterprise tools:

These are strong, double-digit growth numbers. The fact that both Fusion and NetSuite hit the $1.0 billion quarterly revenue mark in Q4 FY2025 shows the scale of this demand for modern, cloud-based financial management.

Currency fluctuations impacting revenue conversion, especially from European and Asian markets

As a global company, a strong U.S. dollar (USD) is a persistent economic headwind. When the USD strengthens against the Euro or various Asian currencies, the revenue Oracle earns overseas translates into fewer dollars when converted back for financial reporting. This is a simple conversion problem, but it hits the top line.

In Q3 FY2025, for instance, Oracle's reported total revenue growth in USD was 6%, but the growth in constant currency (excluding the effect of currency changes) was 8%. That 2 percentage point difference is the direct cost of currency headwinds in that quarter alone. For the first nine months of FY2025, currency movements decreased total revenues by 1 percentage point. This effect also impacted profitability, with currency headwinds negatively affecting Q3 FY2025 Earnings Per Share (EPS) by $0.04.

This is a risk you can't fully eliminate, but Oracle's high proportion of international sales means you must factor in currency volatility when modeling future performance.

Oracle Corporation (ORCL) - PESTLE Analysis: Social factors

You're looking at Oracle Corporation's social landscape and what's clear is that talent, healthcare integration, and corporate ethics are the new battlegrounds. The social factors aren't just about public perception anymore; they directly influence your ability to innovate and retain customers, especially in the high-stakes cloud and AI markets.

Ongoing global competition for top-tier Artificial Intelligence (AI) and cloud engineering talent

The global fight for elite AI and cloud engineering talent is fierce, and it represents a significant social risk for Oracle. The demand for these specialized skills far outstrips supply; globally, 77% of employers struggled to fill job vacancies in 2024, marking the highest talent shortage in 17 years. This means you're competing with every major tech firm for a shrinking pool of experts.

To be fair, Oracle has used its own social policies to its advantage. Its adoption of a hybrid/remote work model has been a key differentiator, helping to attract talent from competitors. For instance, the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) team, which stands at around 23,000 people, has successfully hired over 600 former Amazon employees in the past two years, partly due to Amazon's stricter return-to-office mandate. Still, you have to keep innovating on the employee value proposition (EVP) because 67% of employees will stick with a company if offered clear opportunities for advancement and upskilling, even if they're unhappy with other factors.

Here's the quick math: talent acquisition is a core business function now, not just an HR task. Oracle is leaning into AI for its own recruiting, being named a Leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Talent Acquisition Suites for its use of AI-powered tools to streamline hiring.

Healthcare industry transformation driving demand for integrated platforms post-Cerner acquisition

The $28.4 billion acquisition of Cerner in 2022 positioned Oracle Health at the center of a massive healthcare transformation, but it also brought social challenges. The industry is demanding integrated, AI-driven platforms to reduce clinician burnout and improve patient outcomes, but the transition has been rocky.

Oracle Health's acute care EHR market share has declined from 25% in 2021 to 22.9% in 2024, with a net loss of 74 hospitals. In fact, the company lost 57 unique acute care customers in the past three years, with competitor Epic controlling more than 42% of the acute care hospital market in 2024, compared to Oracle's 23%. This is a clear social signal of customer dissatisfaction and a lack of confidence in the partnership, which has declined from 67% in Q2 2022 to 47% in Q1 2025.

The opportunity lies in the new technology. Oracle is launching a next-generation EHR built on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure in 2025, and early adopters of its Oracle Health Clinical AI Agent-which drafts patient documentation-are showing optimism, suggesting that delivering on the AI promise is the key to winning back customer trust.

Enterprise shift to hybrid work models increasing reliance on secure, scalable cloud applications

The permanent shift to hybrid work models-where employees split time between the office and home-is a massive social trend driving cloud demand. This isn't a temporary change; it's a structural one. In 2025, 54% of enterprises are using a hybrid cloud for mission-critical workloads, and hybrid cloud spending grew by 21% year-over-year.

This social factor directly translates into a huge opportunity for Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). Enterprises are not just moving to the cloud; they are looking for secure, multi-cloud solutions that prevent vendor lock-in and support a distributed workforce. About 90% of IT decision-makers plan to make substantial changes to their cloud strategies over the next two years to better align with AI integration and agility. Oracle's strategy to embed AI, like its new 50+ AI agents in Fusion Cloud Applications, directly addresses the need for secure automation and efficiency in a distributed, hybrid environment.

The enterprise cloud adoption rate is already over 94%, so the focus is now on optimization and security.

Growing public and employee focus on corporate social responsibility and ethical AI use

Public and employee scrutiny on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and ethical technology is rising, making it a critical social factor. This is a non-negotiable expectation from younger talent and enterprise customers alike. Oracle has responded with concrete Fiscal Year 2025 (FY25) goals and results, which are essential for maintaining its brand reputation and attracting talent.

The company has set a goal of achieving 100% renewable energy use across all operations, including Oracle Cloud, by 2025. On the ethical front, the industry is grappling with algorithmic bias, a concern for a quarter of talent specialists surveyed. Oracle's integration of over 50 AI agents into its Fusion Cloud Applications means it must defintely ensure these tools are governed by clear ethical AI guidelines to avoid social backlash and regulatory risk.

Your action item here is to track these non-financial metrics closely. They are leading indicators for brand strength and talent retention.

• Oracle Volunteers contributed over 167,000+ hours of service in FY25.
• Global philanthropy donations totaled US$25M in FY25.
• US$2.4M was donated for pediatric case grants in FY25.
• 100% of OCI data centers in Europe and Latin America are supported by renewable energy.

Finance: Draft a 13-week cash view by Friday, specifically modeling the cost of a 15% salary increase for all AI/Cloud engineering roles to counter talent competition.

Oracle Corporation (ORCL) - PESTLE Analysis: Technological factors

Rapid growth of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Gen2, though still trailing AWS and Microsoft Azure

You've seen the headlines, and the numbers confirm it: Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is growing at a blistering pace, but it's still a distant challenger to the cloud giants. For fiscal year 2025, Oracle's Cloud Infrastructure (IaaS) revenue reached approximately $10.3 billion. This growth is driven by a massive increase in demand for AI-related compute capacity, with OCI consumption revenue surging by 62% in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2025 alone. Here's the quick math: the Cloud Infrastructure segment's growth rate was 50% for the full FY2025. That's a phenomenal acceleration for a company of this scale.

But still, the market share picture shows the scale of the climb ahead. In the third calendar quarter of 2025, the worldwide cloud infrastructure services market hit $107 billion. Oracle's global market share in this massive space hovered at just 3%, while Amazon Web Services (AWS) led with 29% and Microsoft Azure held 20%. The good news is that Oracle's strategy of building out multi-cloud data centers and offering its infrastructure within rivals like Microsoft and Google is paying off, with revenue from these multi-cloud database services skyrocketing 1,529% in the first quarter of fiscal year 2026. That's a defintely smart move.

Aggressive integration of Generative AI (GenAI) capabilities into Fusion and NetSuite applications

The company is making a clear, aggressive push to embed Generative AI (GenAI) directly into its core Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) applications-Fusion and NetSuite. This isn't just a separate tool; it's about making the applications smarter from the inside out. In the NetSuite 2025 Release 1, for example, they introduced the N/llm Module, a developer tool that allows for direct integration of Oracle Cloud's GenAI to automate content generation like reports and emails.

For large enterprises using Fusion, the focus is on high-value, complex workflows. Oracle launched the Oracle AI Agent Studio for Fusion Applications in March 2025, which is designed to let customers and partners build custom AI agents. These agents are already embedded across the suite, helping to automate routine and complex tasks in areas like finance, supply chain, and HR. One partner reported that these AI agents in Fusion Cloud Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) have helped reduce cycle time by over 40% in procure-to-pay processes. That's a direct, measurable productivity gain for customers.

• GenAI-powered management reporting narratives in Fusion ERP.
• Predictive forecast explanations to demystify financial models.
• NetSuite Narrative Reporting drafting detailed financial analysis from transactional data.
• AI agents in Fusion Cloud Human Capital Management (HCM) to accelerate hiring and onboarding.

Successful migration of large, complex customer workloads from on-premise to OCI

The real evidence of OCI's success isn't just its growth rate, but the scale of the customer commitment it's locking in. The company's Remaining Performance Obligations (RPO)-essentially its backlog of contracted future revenue-reached an astonishing $455.3 billion as of August 31, 2025 (Q1 FY2026). This figure represents a monumental 359% increase from the previous year, signaling that major enterprises are signing multi-year, multi-billion-dollar contracts to move their most complex workloads. This includes a single, unnamed customer that signed an agreement expected to contribute more than $30 billion in annual revenue starting in fiscal year 2028. That's a huge vote of confidence in OCI's ability to handle scale.

OCI is designed to allow customers to migrate with minimal or no re-platforming, which is a key selling point for companies with massive, complex legacy systems. For example, GoTo, a global leader in remote working technology, moved its core video technology and other services to OCI, and now uses the platform to support 70% of its products. For the customer, this often means a reported 45% reduction in total cost of ownership and 53% more efficient IT infrastructure teams, according to a recent IDC study of OCI migrations. You can't argue with those efficiency numbers.

Continued challenge of fully integrating the Cerner electronic health record (EHR) platform

The acquisition of Cerner for more than $28 billion in 2022 was a huge bet on healthcare technology, but the integration remains a significant technological and operational challenge. While Oracle Health is planning to release a next-generation, AI-backed Electronic Health Record (EHR) platform in 2025, built from the ground up on OCI, the rollout of the existing system has been fraught with delays.

The most high-profile challenge is the Department of Veteran's Affairs (VA) deployment, a contract potentially worth $10 billion. The VA announced an indefinite pause in deployment in April 2023, and although preparation for a deployment restart is planned for early 2025, the project has been reset due to issues. Beyond the VA, other health systems like Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Airedale NHS Foundation Trust have also postponed their go-live dates. What this estimate hides is the customer perception: as of August 2025, customers reported a decline in vendor partnership and communication, with some large customers having left Oracle Health. The technology is there, but the execution on this complex integration is still a work in progress.

Oracle Corporation (ORCL) - PESTLE Analysis: Legal factors

Compliance costs rising due to the European Union's Digital Markets Act (DMA) and Digital Services Act (DSA)

You need to factor in the significant, non-optional compliance costs coming out of the European Union, specifically from the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and the Digital Services Act (DSA). These regulations are designed to curb the power of large tech companies, and while Oracle Corporation may not be the primary target for all provisions, its global scale ensures it feels the financial pressure.

Here's the quick math on the potential impact: The estimated average annual compliance cost for a large U.S. technology company is around $200 million for the DMA and another $150 million for the DSA, totaling $350 million just to adjust systems and reporting. But the real risk is in the penalties. Non-compliance with the DMA can result in fines up to 10% of the company's total worldwide turnover. Based on Oracle's fiscal year 2025 total revenues of $57.4 billion, that penalty could reach a staggering $5.74 billion. That's a huge number that changes a decision.

The DMA aims to ensure interoperability and prevent vendor lock-in, which directly challenges Oracle's traditional licensing model. The DSA, meanwhile, imposes new requirements for content moderation and transparency, particularly for its cloud-based application services.

Increased global data privacy and protection regulations (e.g., GDPR, CCPA) requiring strict data handling

Data privacy is no longer a niche legal issue; it's a core business risk, and the regulatory environment is only getting tougher. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the EU and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in the U.S. set the global standard, forcing Oracle Corporation to invest heavily in data governance and security across its vast cloud infrastructure (OCI) and applications.

Compliance is a continuous operational cost. The average initial cost for mid-to-large companies to establish a GDPR-compliant framework is around $1.3 million, but for a global entity like Oracle, the ongoing operational expenditure is far higher. The fines are substantial and are actively being levied against major tech players. GDPR penalties can reach €20 million or 4% of global revenue, while CCPA violations can cost up to $7,500 per incident with no cap on the total penalty. Oracle's role as a data processor for thousands of global clients means any compliance failure has exponential liability risk. You defintely need to keep your data security budget high.

Potential antitrust scrutiny regarding cloud licensing practices and perceived vendor lock-in

The most immediate and material legal risk for Oracle Corporation centers on its aggressive software licensing practices, especially as they intersect with its growing cloud business. Competitors like Google Cloud and industry trade groups have formally accused Oracle of using anticompetitive licensing terms to 'distort competition in the cloud' and create vendor lock-in.

The core issue is that Oracle's licensing rules often penalize customers for running Oracle software, particularly its flagship database, on a competitor's cloud platform like Amazon Web Services or Microsoft Azure. A study commissioned by CISPE found that these restrictions can lead to a price multiple of up to 10 times when using Oracle software on a third-party cloud compared to running it on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). This practice is drawing scrutiny from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and is a prime target for the EU's DMA, which aims to mandate interoperability and fair access. The risk here is a forced change to the licensing model, which could impact a significant portion of the Cloud Services and License Support revenue, which was $44.0 billion in fiscal year 2025.

Ongoing litigation risk related to intellectual property (IP) in the database and software space

Oracle Corporation's entire business model is built on its extensive and valuable intellectual property (IP) portfolio, making it a perennial target and plaintiff in IP litigation. The global Intellectual Property Litigation Service market is projected to reach $40 billion by 2025, reflecting the high stakes. The rise of Generative AI is fueling a new wave of IP concerns, with more than half of companies expecting their IP exposure to grow in 2025 due to AI-related issues.

The company is proactive in defending its IP, often seeking declaratory judgments of non-infringement against patent-holding firms to neutralize threats, as seen in its action against Vilox Technologies LLC. The constant threat of patent and trade secret disputes, especially in the high-growth database and software space, requires a substantial and consistent allocation of legal resources. This table highlights the IP litigation focus areas for 2025:

Oracle Corporation (ORCL) - PESTLE Analysis: Environmental factors

Investor and customer pressure for transparent Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting

You need to know that ESG is no longer a soft issue; it's a hard financial risk, and Oracle Corporation's commitment to transparency is a direct response to this market pressure. Investors and large corporate customers are demanding verifiable data on how the company manages its environmental impact, especially its massive cloud infrastructure.

This pressure is driving concrete, measurable targets, not just vague promises. Oracle explicitly states its sustainability goals reflect the shared values of its customers, partners, and investors, and the company is defintely using its cloud solutions to help customers reduce their own carbon footprint, which is a key sales point.

Commitment to powering OCI data centers with 100% renewable energy by a stated target date

Oracle has set an aggressive target: powering its global operations, including all Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) data centers, with 100% renewable energy by the end of calendar year 2025.

As of the end of Fiscal Year 2025 (FY25), the company is very close to hitting this goal, which is a significant achievement given the scale of its global cloud build-out. They use a mix of strategies, including power purchase agreements and Environmental Attribute Certificates (EACs), to reach this coverage.

Here's the quick math on their progress against the 2025 target:

To be fair, the European Cloud regions and 51 offices worldwide are already running on 100% renewable energy, so the remaining gap is in the Americas and APAC locations where sourcing is often harder.

Focus on reducing the carbon footprint of data center operations through energy-efficient hardware

The core of Oracle's environmental strategy is making its cloud infrastructure inherently more efficient than traditional on-premises (on-prem) systems. This is where the real carbon savings for customers happen.

The company is focused on energy-efficient hardware and advanced cooling technologies to drive down the Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) of its data centers. This helps them manage the carbon footprint even as their total energy use grows with the expansion of OCI.

For FY25, Oracle reported its Scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions-which are direct emissions from sources the company owns or controls-were 27,532 metric tons CO2e. The total Scope 1 and 2 emissions for 2025 amounted to approximately 340,041,000 kg CO2e.

Beyond energy, they are also hitting other efficiency targets early:

• Reduction in potable water use per square foot: 53% reduction in FY25, exceeding the 33% goal.
• Reduction in waste to landfill per square foot: 63% reduction in FY25, also exceeding the 33% goal.

This shows a holistic approach to resource management, not just a focus on power. Still, the massive growth in OCI means constant vigilance is required to keep the absolute emissions number from climbing.

Need to address e-waste and lifecycle management for legacy hardware and on-premise systems

The shift to cloud creates a major environmental challenge for customers: what to do with their old, on-premise hardware and legacy systems. Oracle addresses this with a robust, cost-free take-back program for its branded products.

The company manages excess and end-of-life electronic equipment based on a 'reuse, reclaim, and recycle' strategy, partnering with certified recycling facilities.

Here's the key metric on their e-waste efforts:

• In Fiscal Year 2020 (FY20), Oracle collected 2.5 million pounds of retired hardware assets.
• Of that collected hardware, 99.6% was either reused or recycled.

The need for this program is becoming more urgent, too. Many older Oracle databases and enterprise applications, like certain versions of Oracle Exadata hardware, are reaching their End of Life (EOL) between 2024 and 2025. This forces thousands of customers to decommission outdated platforms, so a seamless e-waste solution is critical for customer retention and environmental compliance.