|
Evercore Inc. (EVR): Análisis de 5 Fuerzas [Actualizado en Ene-2025] |
Completamente Editable: Adáptelo A Sus Necesidades En Excel O Sheets
Diseño Profesional: Plantillas Confiables Y Estándares De La Industria
Predeterminadas Para Un Uso Rápido Y Eficiente
Compatible con MAC / PC, completamente desbloqueado
No Se Necesita Experiencia; Fáciles De Seguir
Evercore Inc. (EVR) Bundle
En el mundo de alto riesgo de la banca de inversión, Evercore Inc. (EVR) navega por un complejo panorama competitivo conformado por el marco de cinco fuerzas de Michael Porter. Este análisis estratégico revela la intrincada dinámica que define la posición del mercado de la empresa, desde el poder negociador de afeitadores de los profesionales financieros de élite hasta las sofisticadas demandas de los clientes institucionales. A medida que la tecnología reestructura los servicios de asesoramiento financiero y los competidores globales compiten por el dominio del mercado, la capacidad de Evercore para adaptarse, innovar y mantener su ventaja competitiva se vuelve cada vez más crítica en un ecosistema financiero en rápida evolución.
Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Las cinco fuerzas de Porter: poder de negociación de los proveedores
Número limitado de profesionales de banca de inversión altamente calificadas
A partir de 2024, Evercore Inc. emplea a aproximadamente 750 profesionales de banca de inversión a nivel mundial. El grupo de talentos se caracteriza por una selectividad extrema.
| Categoría profesional | Número de empleados | Años promedio de experiencia |
|---|---|---|
| Directores gerentes senior | 75 | 18-22 años |
| Directores gerentes | 185 | 12-17 años |
| Vicepresidentes | 290 | 7-11 años |
Grupo de talentos especializados con alto valor de mercado
La mediana de compensación total para los profesionales de banca de inversión de primer nivel en Evercore oscila entre $ 750,000 y $ 3.2 millones anuales.
- El 10% superior de los profesionales ganan más de $ 5 millones por año
- Las tasas de retención para el talento clave superan el 85%
- Costos de reclutamiento por promedio profesional senior $ 250,000
Se requiere experiencia significativa en los servicios de asesoramiento financiero
Los servicios de asesoramiento de Evercore exigen conocimiento especializado en múltiples dominios.
| Especialización de asesoramiento | Tamaño de trato promedio | Cuota de mercado |
|---|---|---|
| Aviso de fusiones y adquisiciones | $ 1.2 mil millones | 4.7% |
| Reestructuración | $ 850 millones | 3.2% |
| Consultoría estratégica | $ 675 millones | 2.9% |
Potencial para que los empleados clave negocien una compensación favorable
Las métricas de rendimiento clave demuestran un poder de negociación significativo para el talento superior.
- Las bonificaciones basadas en el rendimiento rango 50-200% del salario base
- La compensación de capital para profesionales superiores promedia $ 1.5 millones anuales
- Los acuerdos de no competencia generalmente abarcan 2-3 años
Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Las cinco fuerzas de Porter: poder de negociación de los clientes
Grandes clientes institucionales con recursos financieros sustanciales
La base de clientes de Evercore incluye:
| Tipo de cliente | Porcentaje de ingresos | Tamaño de transacción promedio |
|---|---|---|
| Fortune 500 Companies | 42% | $ 850 millones |
| Instituciones financieras globales | 33% | $ 1.2 mil millones |
| Empresas de capital privado | 25% | $ 650 millones |
Capacidades de comparación del servicio al cliente
Métricas de paisaje competitivos:
- Tiempo de comparación de tarifas de asesoramiento promedio: 3-5 días
- Plataformas en línea que habilitan la comparación del servicio: 78%
- Tasa de respuesta de RFP estandarizada: 92%
Transacción de alto valor compromiso selectivo
| Tamaño de transacción | Probabilidad de compromiso | Tasa de rechazo |
|---|---|---|
| $ 500 millones - $ 1 mil millones | 65% | 35% |
| $ 1 mil millones - $ 5 mil millones | 85% | 15% |
| Más de $ 5 mil millones | 95% | 5% |
Reputación e influencia de récords
Factores de toma de decisiones del cliente:
- Tasa promedio de finalización del acuerdo: 92%
- Tasa de retención del cliente: 88%
- Puntuación del promotor neto: 76
Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Las cinco fuerzas de Porter: rivalidad competitiva
Competencia intensa en servicios de banca de inversión y asesoramiento
Evercore Inc. enfrenta una presión competitiva significativa en el panorama de la banca de inversión. A partir del cuarto trimestre de 2023, el mercado global de banca de inversión estaba valorado en $ 124.8 mil millones, con una intensa competencia entre las empresas de primer nivel.
| Competidor | Ingresos globales 2023 ($ mil millones) | Cuota de mercado (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Goldman Sachs | 44.2 | 12.5% |
| Morgan Stanley | 41.7 | 11.8% |
| Evercore Inc. | 2.3 | 0.65% |
Grandes bancos de inversión global panorama competitivo
El entorno competitivo incluye varios jugadores clave con presencia sustancial del mercado:
- Goldman Sachs: $ 44.2 mil millones de ingresos en 2023
- Morgan Stanley: $ 41.7 mil millones de ingresos en 2023
- JPMorgan Chase: $ 48.3 mil millones de ingresos en 2023
- Evercore Inc.: $ 2.3 mil millones de ingresos en 2023
Diferenciación a través de experiencia en el sector especializado
La estrategia competitiva de Evercore se centra en la experiencia especializada en el sector en múltiples industrias:
| Sector | Acuerdos de asesoramiento 2023 | Valor de transacción total ($ mil millones) |
|---|---|---|
| Tecnología | 37 | 18.6 |
| Cuidado de la salud | 28 | 12.4 |
| Servicios financieros | 22 | 9.7 |
Modelo de negocio basado en relaciones
El enfoque competitivo de Evercore enfatiza las relaciones con los clientes y los servicios de asesoramiento especializados. En 2023, la empresa mantuvo:
- 278 Relaciones de clientes activos
- 92 directores gerentes senior
- $ 2.3 mil millones en ingresos de asesoramiento total
- Completadas 87 transacciones totales de M&A
Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Las cinco fuerzas de Porter: amenaza de sustitutos
Plataformas de asesoramiento financiero alternativo y servicios de inversión digital
A partir del cuarto trimestre de 2023, las plataformas de inversión digital reportaron $ 275.3 mil millones en activos bajo administración, presentando una amenaza de sustitución significativa a los servicios de asesoramiento tradicionales.
| Plataforma | Aum (miles de millones) | Cuota de mercado (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Robinidad | $95.4 | 14.2% |
| Riqueza | $68.2 | 10.1% |
| Mejoramiento | $41.7 | 6.2% |
Soluciones FinTech emergentes que ofrece servicios de asesoramiento especializados
Las plataformas de asesoramiento Fintech generaron $ 23.6 mil millones en ingresos en 2023, con características clave:
- Tarifa anual promedio: 0.25% en comparación con el tradicional 1-1.5%
- Recomendaciones de inversión impulsadas por IA
- Accesibilidad digital 24/7
Potencial de interrupción impulsada por la tecnología en consultoría financiera
Las plataformas de inversión con IA aumentaron la base de usuarios en un 42.7% en 2023, alcanzando 18.3 millones de usuarios activos.
| Tecnología | Penetración del mercado (%) | Índice de crecimiento |
|---|---|---|
| Advisores robo | 12.4% | 37.5% |
| Herramientas de inversión de IA | 8.9% | 42.7% |
Aumento de la disponibilidad de investigaciones y herramientas de inversiones en línea
Las plataformas de investigación de inversiones gratuitas capturaron una participación de mercado del 34.6% en 2023, con 22.1 millones de usuarios activos.
- Usuarios activos mensuales promedio por plataforma: 1.2 millones
- Ingresos totales de la plataforma de investigación en línea: $ 4.7 mil millones
- Media edad del usuario: 32 años
Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Las cinco fuerzas de Porter: amenaza de nuevos participantes
Requisitos de capital para operaciones de banca de inversión
La inversión de capital inicial de Evercore para establecer operaciones de banca de inversión: $ 50 millones a $ 100 millones.
| Componente de capital | Costo estimado |
|---|---|
| Infraestructura tecnológica | $ 15-25 millones |
| Configuración de oficina | $ 5-10 millones |
| Adquisición inicial de talento | $ 20-35 millones |
Barreras de cumplimiento regulatoria
Costos relacionados con el cumplimiento para los nuevos participantes de la banca de inversión:
- Tarifas de registro de la SEC: $ 150,000 a $ 250,000
- Mantenimiento anual de cumplimiento: $ 1.2-2.5 millones
- Gastos legales y de consultoría para la adherencia regulatoria: $ 500,000 a $ 1 millón anualmente
Requisitos de red profesional
| Métrico de red | Punto de referencia |
|---|---|
| Relaciones mínimas de clientes | 50-100 inversores institucionales |
| Tamaño promedio del acuerdo para establecer credibilidad | Valor de transacción de $ 100-500 millones |
Inversión en infraestructura de talento y tecnología
Costos de adquisición de talento para profesionales de banca de inversión de primer nivel: $ 2-5 millones por ejecutivo senior.
- Inversión de infraestructura tecnológica: $ 10-20 millones
- Análisis de datos y plataformas de investigación: $ 3-7 millones
- Sistemas de ciberseguridad: $ 2-5 millones
Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Porter's Five Forces: Competitive rivalry
Rivalry is intense among a small group of elite advisory firms and large universal banks (GS, MS). Evercore Inc. led the financial services M&A advisory space by value in the first half of 2025, advising on $38.6bn worth of deals, representing a 23.3% growth in value advised compared to the first half of 2024. Still, the competition is fierce, with major players close behind.
| Competitor | H1 2025 Financial Services M&A Advisory Value (USD) | H1 2025 Rank by Value |
|---|---|---|
| Evercore Inc. (EVR) | $38.6bn | #1 |
| JP Morgan | $36.2bn | #2 |
| Barclays | $31.8bn | #3 |
| Morgan Stanley (MS) | $30.9bn | #4 |
| UBS | $29.1bn | #5 |
You see this rivalry play out in the talent market, which is a key battleground. Competition focuses on recruiting and retaining the 168 revenue-generating SMDs (Senior Managing Directors). As of Q2 2025, Evercore Inc. had 159 Investment Banking SMDs, which is about 39% more than at the end of 2021. The firm actively hired, with nine Investment Banking SMDs and one Senior Advisor starting or joining year-to-date in Q2 2025. Furthermore, 11 Investment Banking Managing Directors were promoted to Senior Managing Director in January 2025.
The M&A market rebound in 2025 is increasing competition for advisory mandates. Bankers forecast a 15-20% M&A rebound in 2025-2026, driven by factors like currency volatility. This environment is directly translating into higher fees for Evercore Inc.; third quarter Advisory Fees increased 49% year-over-year, and year-to-date fees grew 34% year-over-year, primarily from large transactions in 2025. For context, the firm advised on the $34.5 billion Cox Communications merger with Charter Communications in Q2 2025.
Differentiation is based on deal execution and sector expertise, not on advisory fee price. For instance, the fee structure for mega-deals typically ranges between 0.5% and 1.5% of the transaction value. This focus on expertise is why Evercore Inc. was able to overtake Morgan Stanley in financial advisory fees by approximately $70 million in 2024. The firm's adjusted compensation ratio dropped to 65.4% in Q2 2025, showing financial discipline even as they invest in talent and growth, such as the acquisition of Robey Warshaw for $196 million.
The intensity of the talent competition is also visible in retention mechanics:
- Robey Warshaw partners receive incentives over six years.
- Compensation and benefits expenses for Evercore Inc. increased 19% year-over-year for the first six months of 2025.
- The firm's advisory business achieved $228 billion in transaction value across 118 deals in 2024.
Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of substitutes
The threat of substitutes for Evercore Inc.'s advisory services is a dynamic area, driven by internal capabilities of clients, the rise of alternative capital providers, and technological advancements encroaching on traditional service lines.
Large corporations can substitute external advice with internal, well-funded corporate development teams.
- Corporate development teams at large companies focus on inorganic growth strategies like M&A.
- At a Fortune 100 company, deal analysis and financial modeling can consume 75% of a team's time.
- Global M&A deal value was $3.4 trillion in 2024.
- Corporate dealmakers accounted for 78 percent of most 2024 transactions globally.
The growth of private credit markets substitutes for traditional debt capital markets services.
The private credit market has seen significant substitution for traditional bank lending, especially following regulatory shifts that constrained bank balance sheets. This directly impacts the debt capital markets advisory Evercore Inc. provides.
| Metric | Value / Estimate (2025/Recent) | Source Year/Context |
|---|---|---|
| Private Credit Market Size (Start of 2025) | $3 trillion | 2025 |
| Private Credit Market Size (2020) | Approx. $2 trillion | 2020 |
| Global Private Debt AUM Estimate (2025) | Approx. $2 trillion | 2025 |
| Potential Addressable Market (All Asset Classes) | Exceeds US$30 trillion | 2025 Outlook |
| Bank Portfolios Acquired by Private Credit Since 2022 | Over $30 billion | Recent Activity |
Fintech and AI platforms automate due diligence, potentially substituting junior banker tasks.
While direct quantification of substitution for advisory tasks is not readily available, the integration of technology into deal processes suggests a shift in the required skill set and the scope of work for junior advisory staff. AI is a major theme in dealmaking.
- Roughly one quarter of M&A deals valued at $5 billion or more in 2025 had an AI theme.
- The global generative AI market is expected to grow from USD37.89 billion in 2025 to circa USD1,005.07 billion by 2034.
Management consulting firms increasingly offer strategic advisory that encroaches on M&A origination.
The broader M&A consulting market size shows the scale of competition, including firms that offer strategic advisory services that can overlap with the origination phase of M&A, which is a core function for Evercore Inc.
| Consulting Market Metric | Value / Projection | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Global M&A Consulting Market Size Estimate (2025) | $50 billion | 2025 |
| Projected M&A Consulting Market CAGR (2025-2033) | 7% | Projection |
| Projected M&A Consulting Market Size (2033) | Approx. $85 billion | 2033 |
| Example Big Four Firm Mid-Market Deal Volume | Approx. $6.2 billion | Recent Activity |
You're assessing the competitive landscape for Evercore Inc., and the encroachment from these substitutes is real, even if the high-end, complex advisory work remains sticky.
Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of new entrants
You're looking at what it takes for a new firm to break into Evercore Inc.'s space, and honestly, the hurdles are steep. New entrants face massive upfront costs just to compete for the talent that drives this business.
Barriers are high due to the massive capital outlay required to attract and pay top SMDs (Senior Managing Directors). Look at Evercore Inc.'s own spending; for the third quarter of 2025, Employee Compensation and Benefits hit $192.6 million, a 39% jump year-over-year. Year-to-date for 2025, that expense was $354.4 million, reflecting a 27% increase. In the second quarter of 2025, the expense was $548.6 million for the quarter. The compensation ratio for the year-to-date period stood at 65.8%. That's the kind of compensation package a new player must match immediately to lure away even one successful SMD.
Establishing a global, trusted brand and network of 20 Investment Banking offices takes decades. Evercore Inc. started in 1995, giving it a nearly 30-year head start in building client trust and deal flow experience. New entrants need to replicate this footprint, which is no small feat.
Here's a quick look at the scale required to even approach Evercore Inc.'s established presence as of mid-2025:
| Metric | Evercore Inc. (Q2 2025) | Evercore Inc. (Q1 2025) |
| Investment Banking Offices Globally | 19 | 18 |
| Investment Banking Senior Managing Directors (SMDs) | 159 | 157 |
| Employees Worldwide | ~2,455 | ~2,400 |
| Countries with Evercore Offices | 13 | 12 |
Regulatory compliance and capital requirements create a significant hurdle for new banking platforms. The regulatory framework is designed to keep capital levels high for established players, which acts as a barrier to undercapitalized startups. For large banks, the minimum Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio requirement, effective October 1, 2025, is 4.5 percent. For Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs), there is an additional capital surcharge of at least 1.0 percent. Furthermore, the Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) rule requires a U.S. GSIB to maintain a buffer of at least 2% of its total leverage exposure. To be fair, some recent regulatory shifts might ease burdens for existing large banks; for instance, regulatory staff projected that a final rule could reduce aggregate tier 1 capital requirements for large bank subsidiaries by 28%. Still, the baseline compliance cost is substantial.
Big Tech companies (e.g., Amazon, Google) pose a long-term, disruptive threat via data and AI. These firms command resources that dwarf traditional investment banks. For example, in 2025, Big Tech companies like Microsoft and Meta announced plans to collectively spend hundreds of billions of dollars on AI infrastructure and talent. This focus on AI talent acquisition is already visible in the M&A space; globally, the total value of M&A deals for AI startups rose 288% in 2024 to $49.9 billion, and by mid-2025, that value had already exceeded the full-year 2024 total. Amazon even executed a "reverse" acqui-hire with AI robotics startup Covariant in August 2025.
New entrants must overcome these hurdles:
- Attract and retain talent commanding compensation packages over $548.6 million quarterly.
- Build a global footprint matching 19 IB offices across 13 countries.
- Secure capital to meet minimum CET1 ratios of 4.5% plus surcharges.
- Compete against Big Tech deploying hundreds of billions of dollars into AI capabilities.
Finance: draft 13-week cash view by Friday.
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.