|
Evercore Inc. (EVR): 5 Forces Analysis [Jan-2025 MISE À JOUR] |
Entièrement Modifiable: Adapté À Vos Besoins Dans Excel Ou Sheets
Conception Professionnelle: Modèles Fiables Et Conformes Aux Normes Du Secteur
Pré-Construits Pour Une Utilisation Rapide Et Efficace
Compatible MAC/PC, entièrement débloqué
Aucune Expertise N'Est Requise; Facile À Suivre
Evercore Inc. (EVR) Bundle
Dans le monde à enjeux élevés de la banque d'investissement, Evercore Inc. (EVR) navigue dans un paysage concurrentiel complexe façonné par le cadre des cinq forces de Michael Porter. Cette analyse stratégique révèle la dynamique complexe qui définit la position du marché de l'entreprise, du pouvoir de négociation des rasoirs des professionnels financiers d'élite aux exigences sophistiquées des clients institutionnels. Alors que la technologie remodèle les services de conseil financier et les concurrents mondiaux de la domination du marché, la capacité d'Evercore à s'adapter, innover et maintenir son avantage concurrentiel devient de plus en plus critique dans un écosystème financier en évolution rapide.
Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Porter's Five Forces: Bangaining Power of Fournissers
Nombre limité de professionnels de la banque d'investissement hautement qualifiés
En 2024, Evercore Inc. emploie environ 750 professionnels de la banque d'investissement dans le monde. Le bassin de talents se caractérise par une sélectivité extrême.
| Catégorie professionnelle | Nombre d'employés | Des années moyennes d'expérience |
|---|---|---|
| Directeurs de direction supérieurs | 75 | 18-22 ans |
| Directeurs de gestion | 185 | 12-17 ans |
| Vice-présidents | 290 | 7-11 ans |
Pool de talents spécialisé avec une valeur marchande élevée
La rémunération totale médiane des professionnels de la banque d'investissement de premier plan d'Evercore varie entre 750 000 $ et 3,2 millions de dollars par an.
- Les 10% supérieurs des professionnels gagnent plus de 5 millions de dollars par an
- Les taux de rétention pour les talents clés dépassent 85%
- Coûts de recrutement par moyenne professionnelle senior 250 000 $
Expertise significative requise dans les services de conseil financier
Les services consultatifs d'Evercore exigent des connaissances spécialisées dans plusieurs domaines.
| Spécialisation consultative | Taille moyenne de l'accord | Part de marché |
|---|---|---|
| Avis de fusions et acquisitions | 1,2 milliard de dollars | 4.7% |
| Restructuration | 850 millions de dollars | 3.2% |
| Conseil stratégique | 675 millions de dollars | 2.9% |
Potentiel pour les employés clés pour négocier une compensation favorable
Les mesures de performance clés démontrent un pouvoir de négociation important pour les meilleurs talents.
- Les bonus basés sur les performances varient 50-200% du salaire de base
- La rémunération des actions pour les professionnels supérieurs atteint en moyenne 1,5 million de dollars par an
- Les accords de non-concurrence s'étendent généralement 2-3 ans
Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Five Forces de Porter: Pouvoir de négociation des clients
Grands clients institutionnels avec des ressources financières substantielles
La clientèle d'Evercore comprend:
| Type de client | Pourcentage de revenus | Taille moyenne des transactions |
|---|---|---|
| Fortune 500 Companies | 42% | 850 millions de dollars |
| Institutions financières mondiales | 33% | 1,2 milliard de dollars |
| Sociétés de capital-investissement | 25% | 650 millions de dollars |
Capacités de comparaison du service à la clientèle
Métriques de paysage concurrentiel:
- Temps de comparaison des frais de conseil moyen: 3-5 jours
- Plates-formes en ligne permettant la comparaison des services: 78%
- Taux de réponse RFP standardisé: 92%
Engagement sélectif des transactions de grande valeur
| Taille de transaction | Probabilité d'engagement | Taux de rejet |
|---|---|---|
| 500 millions de dollars - 1 milliard de dollars | 65% | 35% |
| 1 milliard de dollars - 5 milliards de dollars | 85% | 15% |
| Plus de 5 milliards de dollars | 95% | 5% |
Réputation et influence des antécédents
Facteurs de prise de décision du client:
- Taux d'achèvement de l'accord moyen: 92%
- Taux de rétention de la clientèle: 88%
- Score du promoteur net: 76
Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Five Forces de Porter: rivalité compétitive
Concurrence intense dans les services de banque d'investissement et de conseil
Evercore Inc. fait face à une pression concurrentielle importante dans le paysage des banques d'investissement. Au quatrième trimestre 2023, le marché mondial de la banque d'investissement était évalué à 124,8 milliards de dollars, avec une concurrence intense entre les entreprises de haut niveau.
| Concurrent | Global Revenue 2023 (milliards de dollars) | Part de marché (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Goldman Sachs | 44.2 | 12.5% |
| Morgan Stanley | 41.7 | 11.8% |
| Evercore Inc. | 2.3 | 0.65% |
Paysage concurrentiel des banques d'investissement mondiales majeures
L'environnement concurrentiel comprend plusieurs acteurs clés avec une présence substantielle sur le marché:
- Goldman Sachs: 44,2 milliards de dollars de revenus en 2023
- Morgan Stanley: 41,7 milliards de dollars de revenus en 2023
- JPMorgan Chase: 48,3 milliards de dollars de revenus en 2023
- Evercore inc.: 2,3 milliards de dollars de revenus en 2023
Différenciation par l'expertise du secteur spécialisé
La stratégie concurrentielle d'Evercore se concentre sur l'expertise du secteur spécialisé dans plusieurs industries:
| Secteur | Transactions consultatives 2023 | Valeur totale de la transaction (milliards de dollars) |
|---|---|---|
| Technologie | 37 | 18.6 |
| Soins de santé | 28 | 12.4 |
| Services financiers | 22 | 9.7 |
Modèle commercial axé sur les relations
L'approche concurrentielle d'Evercore met l'accent sur les relations avec les clients et les services de conseil spécialisés. En 2023, l'entreprise a maintenu:
- 278 relations avec les clients actifs
- 92 Directeurs supérieurs
- 2,3 milliards de dollars de revenus consultatifs totaux
- Terminé 87 transactions au total des fusions et acquisitions
Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Five Forces de Porter: menace de substituts
Plateformes de conseil financier alternatives et services d'investissement numérique
Au quatrième trimestre 2023, les plateformes d'investissement numérique ont déclaré 275,3 milliards de dollars d'actifs sous gestion, présentant une menace de substitution importante pour les services de conseil traditionnels.
| Plate-forme | Aum (milliards) | Part de marché (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Robin | $95.4 | 14.2% |
| Richesse | $68.2 | 10.1% |
| Amélioration | $41.7 | 6.2% |
Solutions émergentes fintech offrant des services de conseil spécialisés
Les plateformes de conseil fintech ont généré 23,6 milliards de dollars de revenus en 2023, avec des caractéristiques clés:
- Frais annuels moyens: 0,25% par rapport à 1-1,5% traditionnel
- Recommandations d'investissement axées sur l'IA
- Accessibilité numérique 24/7
Potentiel de perturbation axée sur la technologie dans le conseil financier
Les plates-formes d'investissement alimentées en AI ont augmenté la base d'utilisateurs de 42,7% en 2023, atteignant 18,3 millions d'utilisateurs actifs.
| Technologie | Pénétration du marché (%) | Taux de croissance |
|---|---|---|
| Robo-conseillers | 12.4% | 37.5% |
| Outils d'investissement en IA | 8.9% | 42.7% |
Disponibilité croissante de la recherche et des outils d'investissement en ligne
Des plateformes de recherche d'investissement gratuites ont capturé 34,6% de parts de marché en 2023, avec 22,1 millions d'utilisateurs actifs.
- Utilisateurs actifs mensuels moyens par plate-forme: 1,2 million
- Revenus de plate-forme de recherche en ligne totale: 4,7 milliards de dollars
- Âge de l'utilisateur médian: 32 ans
Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Five Forces de Porter: menace de nouveaux entrants
Exigences en matière de capital pour les opérations de banque d'investissement
L'investissement en capital initial d'Evercore pour établir des opérations de banque d'investissement: 50 à 100 millions de dollars.
| Composant capital | Coût estimé |
|---|---|
| Infrastructure technologique | 15-25 millions de dollars |
| Configuration de bureau | 5-10 millions de dollars |
| Acquisition initiale de talents | 20 à 35 millions de dollars |
Obstacles à la conformité réglementaire
Coûts liés à la conformité pour les nouveaux participants bancaires d'investissement:
- Frais d'enregistrement de la SEC: 150 000 $ à 250 000 $
- Maintenance annuelle de la conformité: 1,2 à 2,5 millions de dollars
- Dépenses juridiques et de consultation pour l'adhésion réglementaire: 500 000 $ à 1 million de dollars par an
Exigences de réseau professionnel
| Métrique du réseau | Référence |
|---|---|
| Relations avec les clients minimaux | 50-100 investisseurs institutionnels |
| Taille moyenne de l'accord pour établir la crédibilité | Valeur de transaction de 100 à 500 millions de dollars |
Investissement d'infrastructure de talents et de technologie
Coûts d'acquisition de talents pour les professionnels de la banque d'investissement de haut niveau: 2 à 5 millions de dollars par cadre supérieur.
- Investissement infrastructure technologique: 10-20 millions de dollars
- Analyse des données et plateformes de recherche: 3 à 7 millions de dollars
- Systèmes de cybersécurité: 2 à 5 millions de dollars
Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Porter's Five Forces: Competitive rivalry
Rivalry is intense among a small group of elite advisory firms and large universal banks (GS, MS). Evercore Inc. led the financial services M&A advisory space by value in the first half of 2025, advising on $38.6bn worth of deals, representing a 23.3% growth in value advised compared to the first half of 2024. Still, the competition is fierce, with major players close behind.
| Competitor | H1 2025 Financial Services M&A Advisory Value (USD) | H1 2025 Rank by Value |
|---|---|---|
| Evercore Inc. (EVR) | $38.6bn | #1 |
| JP Morgan | $36.2bn | #2 |
| Barclays | $31.8bn | #3 |
| Morgan Stanley (MS) | $30.9bn | #4 |
| UBS | $29.1bn | #5 |
You see this rivalry play out in the talent market, which is a key battleground. Competition focuses on recruiting and retaining the 168 revenue-generating SMDs (Senior Managing Directors). As of Q2 2025, Evercore Inc. had 159 Investment Banking SMDs, which is about 39% more than at the end of 2021. The firm actively hired, with nine Investment Banking SMDs and one Senior Advisor starting or joining year-to-date in Q2 2025. Furthermore, 11 Investment Banking Managing Directors were promoted to Senior Managing Director in January 2025.
The M&A market rebound in 2025 is increasing competition for advisory mandates. Bankers forecast a 15-20% M&A rebound in 2025-2026, driven by factors like currency volatility. This environment is directly translating into higher fees for Evercore Inc.; third quarter Advisory Fees increased 49% year-over-year, and year-to-date fees grew 34% year-over-year, primarily from large transactions in 2025. For context, the firm advised on the $34.5 billion Cox Communications merger with Charter Communications in Q2 2025.
Differentiation is based on deal execution and sector expertise, not on advisory fee price. For instance, the fee structure for mega-deals typically ranges between 0.5% and 1.5% of the transaction value. This focus on expertise is why Evercore Inc. was able to overtake Morgan Stanley in financial advisory fees by approximately $70 million in 2024. The firm's adjusted compensation ratio dropped to 65.4% in Q2 2025, showing financial discipline even as they invest in talent and growth, such as the acquisition of Robey Warshaw for $196 million.
The intensity of the talent competition is also visible in retention mechanics:
- Robey Warshaw partners receive incentives over six years.
- Compensation and benefits expenses for Evercore Inc. increased 19% year-over-year for the first six months of 2025.
- The firm's advisory business achieved $228 billion in transaction value across 118 deals in 2024.
Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of substitutes
The threat of substitutes for Evercore Inc.'s advisory services is a dynamic area, driven by internal capabilities of clients, the rise of alternative capital providers, and technological advancements encroaching on traditional service lines.
Large corporations can substitute external advice with internal, well-funded corporate development teams.
- Corporate development teams at large companies focus on inorganic growth strategies like M&A.
- At a Fortune 100 company, deal analysis and financial modeling can consume 75% of a team's time.
- Global M&A deal value was $3.4 trillion in 2024.
- Corporate dealmakers accounted for 78 percent of most 2024 transactions globally.
The growth of private credit markets substitutes for traditional debt capital markets services.
The private credit market has seen significant substitution for traditional bank lending, especially following regulatory shifts that constrained bank balance sheets. This directly impacts the debt capital markets advisory Evercore Inc. provides.
| Metric | Value / Estimate (2025/Recent) | Source Year/Context |
|---|---|---|
| Private Credit Market Size (Start of 2025) | $3 trillion | 2025 |
| Private Credit Market Size (2020) | Approx. $2 trillion | 2020 |
| Global Private Debt AUM Estimate (2025) | Approx. $2 trillion | 2025 |
| Potential Addressable Market (All Asset Classes) | Exceeds US$30 trillion | 2025 Outlook |
| Bank Portfolios Acquired by Private Credit Since 2022 | Over $30 billion | Recent Activity |
Fintech and AI platforms automate due diligence, potentially substituting junior banker tasks.
While direct quantification of substitution for advisory tasks is not readily available, the integration of technology into deal processes suggests a shift in the required skill set and the scope of work for junior advisory staff. AI is a major theme in dealmaking.
- Roughly one quarter of M&A deals valued at $5 billion or more in 2025 had an AI theme.
- The global generative AI market is expected to grow from USD37.89 billion in 2025 to circa USD1,005.07 billion by 2034.
Management consulting firms increasingly offer strategic advisory that encroaches on M&A origination.
The broader M&A consulting market size shows the scale of competition, including firms that offer strategic advisory services that can overlap with the origination phase of M&A, which is a core function for Evercore Inc.
| Consulting Market Metric | Value / Projection | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Global M&A Consulting Market Size Estimate (2025) | $50 billion | 2025 |
| Projected M&A Consulting Market CAGR (2025-2033) | 7% | Projection |
| Projected M&A Consulting Market Size (2033) | Approx. $85 billion | 2033 |
| Example Big Four Firm Mid-Market Deal Volume | Approx. $6.2 billion | Recent Activity |
You're assessing the competitive landscape for Evercore Inc., and the encroachment from these substitutes is real, even if the high-end, complex advisory work remains sticky.
Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of new entrants
You're looking at what it takes for a new firm to break into Evercore Inc.'s space, and honestly, the hurdles are steep. New entrants face massive upfront costs just to compete for the talent that drives this business.
Barriers are high due to the massive capital outlay required to attract and pay top SMDs (Senior Managing Directors). Look at Evercore Inc.'s own spending; for the third quarter of 2025, Employee Compensation and Benefits hit $192.6 million, a 39% jump year-over-year. Year-to-date for 2025, that expense was $354.4 million, reflecting a 27% increase. In the second quarter of 2025, the expense was $548.6 million for the quarter. The compensation ratio for the year-to-date period stood at 65.8%. That's the kind of compensation package a new player must match immediately to lure away even one successful SMD.
Establishing a global, trusted brand and network of 20 Investment Banking offices takes decades. Evercore Inc. started in 1995, giving it a nearly 30-year head start in building client trust and deal flow experience. New entrants need to replicate this footprint, which is no small feat.
Here's a quick look at the scale required to even approach Evercore Inc.'s established presence as of mid-2025:
| Metric | Evercore Inc. (Q2 2025) | Evercore Inc. (Q1 2025) |
| Investment Banking Offices Globally | 19 | 18 |
| Investment Banking Senior Managing Directors (SMDs) | 159 | 157 |
| Employees Worldwide | ~2,455 | ~2,400 |
| Countries with Evercore Offices | 13 | 12 |
Regulatory compliance and capital requirements create a significant hurdle for new banking platforms. The regulatory framework is designed to keep capital levels high for established players, which acts as a barrier to undercapitalized startups. For large banks, the minimum Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio requirement, effective October 1, 2025, is 4.5 percent. For Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs), there is an additional capital surcharge of at least 1.0 percent. Furthermore, the Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) rule requires a U.S. GSIB to maintain a buffer of at least 2% of its total leverage exposure. To be fair, some recent regulatory shifts might ease burdens for existing large banks; for instance, regulatory staff projected that a final rule could reduce aggregate tier 1 capital requirements for large bank subsidiaries by 28%. Still, the baseline compliance cost is substantial.
Big Tech companies (e.g., Amazon, Google) pose a long-term, disruptive threat via data and AI. These firms command resources that dwarf traditional investment banks. For example, in 2025, Big Tech companies like Microsoft and Meta announced plans to collectively spend hundreds of billions of dollars on AI infrastructure and talent. This focus on AI talent acquisition is already visible in the M&A space; globally, the total value of M&A deals for AI startups rose 288% in 2024 to $49.9 billion, and by mid-2025, that value had already exceeded the full-year 2024 total. Amazon even executed a "reverse" acqui-hire with AI robotics startup Covariant in August 2025.
New entrants must overcome these hurdles:
- Attract and retain talent commanding compensation packages over $548.6 million quarterly.
- Build a global footprint matching 19 IB offices across 13 countries.
- Secure capital to meet minimum CET1 ratios of 4.5% plus surcharges.
- Compete against Big Tech deploying hundreds of billions of dollars into AI capabilities.
Finance: draft 13-week cash view by Friday.
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.