Evercore Inc. (EVR) Porter's Five Forces Analysis

Evercore Inc. (EVR): 5 forças Análise [Jan-2025 Atualizada]

US | Financial Services | Financial - Capital Markets | NYSE
Evercore Inc. (EVR) Porter's Five Forces Analysis

Totalmente Editável: Adapte-Se Às Suas Necessidades No Excel Ou Planilhas

Design Profissional: Modelos Confiáveis ​​E Padrão Da Indústria

Pré-Construídos Para Uso Rápido E Eficiente

Compatível com MAC/PC, totalmente desbloqueado

Não É Necessária Experiência; Fácil De Seguir

Evercore Inc. (EVR) Bundle

Get Full Bundle:
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$25 $15
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99
$14.99 $9.99

TOTAL:

No mundo do Banco de Investimento, a Evercore Inc. (EVR) navega em uma paisagem competitiva complexa moldada pela estrutura das cinco forças de Michael Porter. Essa análise estratégica revela a intrincada dinâmica que define a posição de mercado da empresa, desde o poder de negociação de Razor Sharp dos profissionais financeiros de elite até as sofisticadas demandas de clientes institucionais. À medida que a tecnologia reformula os serviços de consultoria financeira e os concorrentes globais disputam o domínio do mercado, a capacidade do Evercore de se adaptar, inovar e manter sua vantagem competitiva se torna cada vez mais crítica em um ecossistema financeiro em rápida evolução.



Evercore Inc. (EVR) - As cinco forças de Porter: poder de barganha dos fornecedores

Número limitado de profissionais de bancos de investimento altamente qualificados

A partir de 2024, a Evercore Inc. emprega aproximadamente 750 profissionais de banco de investimentos em todo o mundo. O pool de talentos é caracterizado por extrema seletividade.

Categoria profissional Número de funcionários Anos médios de experiência
Diretores -gerentes seniores 75 18-22 anos
Diretores Gerenciais 185 12-17 anos
Vice -presidentes 290 7-11 anos

Pool de talentos especializado com alto valor de mercado

A remuneração total média dos profissionais de banco de investimento de primeira linha na Evercore varia entre US $ 750.000 e US $ 3,2 milhões anualmente.

  • 10% dos profissionais ganham mais de US $ 5 milhões por ano
  • As taxas de retenção para os principais talentos excedem 85%
  • Custos de recrutamento por média profissional sênior $ 250.000

Experiência significativa necessária nos serviços de consultoria financeira

Os serviços de consultoria da Evercore exigem conhecimento especializado em vários domínios.

Especialização consultiva Tamanho médio de negócios Quota de mercado
Aviso de M&A US $ 1,2 bilhão 4.7%
Reestruturação US $ 850 milhões 3.2%
Consultoria estratégica US $ 675 milhões 2.9%

Potencial para os principais funcionários negociarem compensação favorável

As principais métricas de desempenho demonstram poder de negociação significativo para os melhores talentos.

  • Os bônus baseados em desempenho variam de 50-200% do salário-base
  • A compensação patrimonial para profissionais seniores em média de US $ 1,5 milhão anualmente
  • Os acordos de não concorrência normalmente abrangem 2-3 anos


Evercore Inc. (EVR) - As cinco forças de Porter: poder de barganha dos clientes

Grandes clientes institucionais com recursos financeiros substanciais

A base de clientes do Evercore inclui:

Tipo de cliente Porcentagem de receita Tamanho médio da transação
Fortune 500 empresas 42% US $ 850 milhões
Instituições Financeiras Globais 33% US $ 1,2 bilhão
Empresas de private equity 25% US $ 650 milhões

Recursos de comparação de atendimento ao cliente

Métricas de paisagem competitiva:

  • Taxa de consultoria média Tempo de comparação: 3-5 dias
  • Plataformas online que permitem comparação de serviços: 78%
  • Taxa de resposta RFP padronizada: 92%

Engajamento seletivo de transação de alto valor

Tamanho da transação Probabilidade de engajamento Taxa de rejeição
US $ 500 milhões - US $ 1 bilhão 65% 35%
US $ 1 bilhão - US $ 5 bilhões 85% 15%
Mais de US $ 5 bilhões 95% 5%

Reputação e rastrear influência do registro

Fatores de tomada de decisão do cliente:

  • Taxa média de conclusão de negócios: 92%
  • Taxa de retenção de clientes: 88%
  • Pontuação do promotor líquido: 76


Evercore Inc. (EVR) - As cinco forças de Porter: rivalidade competitiva

Concorrência intensa em serviços bancários de investimentos e serviços de consultoria

A Evercore Inc. enfrenta uma pressão competitiva significativa no cenário bancário de investimentos. No quarto trimestre de 2023, o mercado global de banco de investimento foi avaliado em US $ 124,8 bilhões, com intensa concorrência entre empresas de primeira linha.

Concorrente Receita Global 2023 (US $ bilhões) Quota de mercado (%)
Goldman Sachs 44.2 12.5%
Morgan Stanley 41.7 11.8%
Evercore Inc. 2.3 0.65%

Principais bancos de investimento global cenário competitivo

O ambiente competitivo inclui vários atores importantes com presença substancial no mercado:

  • Goldman Sachs: Receita de US $ 44,2 bilhões em 2023
  • Morgan Stanley: Receita de US $ 41,7 bilhões em 2023
  • JPMorgan Chase: Receita de US $ 48,3 bilhões em 2023
  • Evercore Inc.: Receita de US $ 2,3 bilhões em 2023

Diferenciação através de especialização especializada no setor

A estratégia competitiva da Evercore se concentra em conhecimentos especializados do setor em vários setores:

Setor Acordos de consultoria 2023 Valor total da transação (US $ bilhões)
Tecnologia 37 18.6
Assistência médica 28 12.4
Serviços financeiros 22 9.7

Modelo de negócios orientado por relacionamento

A abordagem competitiva do Evercore enfatiza o relacionamento com os clientes e os serviços de consultoria especializados. Em 2023, a empresa manteve:

  • 278 relacionamentos ativos do cliente
  • 92 diretores de gerenciamento seniores
  • US $ 2,3 bilhões em receitas de consultoria total
  • Concluiu 87 transações totais de fusões e aquisições


Evercore Inc. (EVR) - As cinco forças de Porter: ameaça de substitutos

Plataformas de consultoria financeira alternativas e serviços de investimento digital

No quarto trimestre 2023, as plataformas de investimento digital reportaram US $ 275,3 bilhões em ativos sob gestão, apresentando uma ameaça de substituição significativa aos serviços de consultoria tradicionais.

Plataforma AUM (bilhões) Quota de mercado (%)
Robinhood $95.4 14.2%
Wealthfront $68.2 10.1%
Melhoramento $41.7 6.2%

Soluções emergentes da FinTech, oferecendo serviços de consultoria especializados

As plataformas consultivas da Fintech geraram US $ 23,6 bilhões em receita em 2023, com características -chave:

  • Taxa anual média: 0,25% em comparação com 1-1,5% tradicional
  • Recomendações de investimento orientadas pela IA
  • Acessibilidade digital 24/7

Potencial de interrupção orientada para a tecnologia em consultoria financeira

As plataformas de investimento movidas a IA aumentaram a base de usuários em 42,7% em 2023, atingindo 18,3 milhões de usuários ativos.

Tecnologia Penetração de mercado (%) Taxa de crescimento
Robo-Advisores 12.4% 37.5%
Ferramentas de investimento da IA 8.9% 42.7%

Aumentando a disponibilidade de pesquisa e ferramentas de investimento on -line

As plataformas de pesquisa de investimento gratuitas capturaram 34,6% de participação de mercado em 2023, com 22,1 milhões de usuários ativos.

  • Usuários ativos mensais médios por plataforma: 1,2 milhão
  • Receita total da plataforma de pesquisa on -line: US $ 4,7 bilhões
  • Usuário mediano Idade: 32 anos


Evercore Inc. (EVR) - As cinco forças de Porter: ameaça de novos participantes

Requisitos de capital para operações bancárias de investimento

O investimento inicial de capital da Evercore para estabelecer operações bancárias de investimento: US $ 50 milhões a US $ 100 milhões.

Componente de capital Custo estimado
Infraestrutura de tecnologia US $ 15-25 milhões
Configuração do escritório US $ 5 a 10 milhões
Aquisição inicial de talentos US $ 20-35 milhões

Barreiras de conformidade regulatória

Custos relacionados à conformidade para novos participantes de banco de investimento:

  • Taxas de registro da SEC: US ​​$ 150.000 a US $ 250.000
  • Manutenção anual de conformidade: US $ 1,2-2,5 milhão
  • Despesas legais e de consultoria para adesão regulatória: US $ 500.000 a US $ 1 milhão anualmente

Requisitos de rede profissional

Métrica de rede Benchmark
Relacionamentos mínimos do cliente 50-100 investidores institucionais
Tamanho médio do negócio para estabelecer credibilidade Valor da transação de US $ 100-500 milhões

Investimento de infraestrutura de talento e tecnologia

Custos de aquisição de talentos para profissionais de banco de investimento de primeira linha: US $ 2-5 milhões por executivo sênior.

  • Investimento de infraestrutura tecnológica: US $ 10-20 milhões
  • Análise de dados e plataformas de pesquisa: US $ 3-7 milhões
  • Sistemas de segurança cibernética: US $ 2-5 milhões

Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Porter's Five Forces: Competitive rivalry

Rivalry is intense among a small group of elite advisory firms and large universal banks (GS, MS). Evercore Inc. led the financial services M&A advisory space by value in the first half of 2025, advising on $38.6bn worth of deals, representing a 23.3% growth in value advised compared to the first half of 2024. Still, the competition is fierce, with major players close behind.

Competitor H1 2025 Financial Services M&A Advisory Value (USD) H1 2025 Rank by Value
Evercore Inc. (EVR) $38.6bn #1
JP Morgan $36.2bn #2
Barclays $31.8bn #3
Morgan Stanley (MS) $30.9bn #4
UBS $29.1bn #5

You see this rivalry play out in the talent market, which is a key battleground. Competition focuses on recruiting and retaining the 168 revenue-generating SMDs (Senior Managing Directors). As of Q2 2025, Evercore Inc. had 159 Investment Banking SMDs, which is about 39% more than at the end of 2021. The firm actively hired, with nine Investment Banking SMDs and one Senior Advisor starting or joining year-to-date in Q2 2025. Furthermore, 11 Investment Banking Managing Directors were promoted to Senior Managing Director in January 2025.

The M&A market rebound in 2025 is increasing competition for advisory mandates. Bankers forecast a 15-20% M&A rebound in 2025-2026, driven by factors like currency volatility. This environment is directly translating into higher fees for Evercore Inc.; third quarter Advisory Fees increased 49% year-over-year, and year-to-date fees grew 34% year-over-year, primarily from large transactions in 2025. For context, the firm advised on the $34.5 billion Cox Communications merger with Charter Communications in Q2 2025.

Differentiation is based on deal execution and sector expertise, not on advisory fee price. For instance, the fee structure for mega-deals typically ranges between 0.5% and 1.5% of the transaction value. This focus on expertise is why Evercore Inc. was able to overtake Morgan Stanley in financial advisory fees by approximately $70 million in 2024. The firm's adjusted compensation ratio dropped to 65.4% in Q2 2025, showing financial discipline even as they invest in talent and growth, such as the acquisition of Robey Warshaw for $196 million.

The intensity of the talent competition is also visible in retention mechanics:

  • Robey Warshaw partners receive incentives over six years.
  • Compensation and benefits expenses for Evercore Inc. increased 19% year-over-year for the first six months of 2025.
  • The firm's advisory business achieved $228 billion in transaction value across 118 deals in 2024.

Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of substitutes

The threat of substitutes for Evercore Inc.'s advisory services is a dynamic area, driven by internal capabilities of clients, the rise of alternative capital providers, and technological advancements encroaching on traditional service lines.

Large corporations can substitute external advice with internal, well-funded corporate development teams.

  • Corporate development teams at large companies focus on inorganic growth strategies like M&A.
  • At a Fortune 100 company, deal analysis and financial modeling can consume 75% of a team's time.
  • Global M&A deal value was $3.4 trillion in 2024.
  • Corporate dealmakers accounted for 78 percent of most 2024 transactions globally.

The growth of private credit markets substitutes for traditional debt capital markets services.

The private credit market has seen significant substitution for traditional bank lending, especially following regulatory shifts that constrained bank balance sheets. This directly impacts the debt capital markets advisory Evercore Inc. provides.

Metric Value / Estimate (2025/Recent) Source Year/Context
Private Credit Market Size (Start of 2025) $3 trillion 2025
Private Credit Market Size (2020) Approx. $2 trillion 2020
Global Private Debt AUM Estimate (2025) Approx. $2 trillion 2025
Potential Addressable Market (All Asset Classes) Exceeds US$30 trillion 2025 Outlook
Bank Portfolios Acquired by Private Credit Since 2022 Over $30 billion Recent Activity

Fintech and AI platforms automate due diligence, potentially substituting junior banker tasks.

While direct quantification of substitution for advisory tasks is not readily available, the integration of technology into deal processes suggests a shift in the required skill set and the scope of work for junior advisory staff. AI is a major theme in dealmaking.

  • Roughly one quarter of M&A deals valued at $5 billion or more in 2025 had an AI theme.
  • The global generative AI market is expected to grow from USD37.89 billion in 2025 to circa USD1,005.07 billion by 2034.

Management consulting firms increasingly offer strategic advisory that encroaches on M&A origination.

The broader M&A consulting market size shows the scale of competition, including firms that offer strategic advisory services that can overlap with the origination phase of M&A, which is a core function for Evercore Inc.

Consulting Market Metric Value / Projection Context
Global M&A Consulting Market Size Estimate (2025) $50 billion 2025
Projected M&A Consulting Market CAGR (2025-2033) 7% Projection
Projected M&A Consulting Market Size (2033) Approx. $85 billion 2033
Example Big Four Firm Mid-Market Deal Volume Approx. $6.2 billion Recent Activity

You're assessing the competitive landscape for Evercore Inc., and the encroachment from these substitutes is real, even if the high-end, complex advisory work remains sticky.

Evercore Inc. (EVR) - Porter's Five Forces: Threat of new entrants

You're looking at what it takes for a new firm to break into Evercore Inc.'s space, and honestly, the hurdles are steep. New entrants face massive upfront costs just to compete for the talent that drives this business.

Barriers are high due to the massive capital outlay required to attract and pay top SMDs (Senior Managing Directors). Look at Evercore Inc.'s own spending; for the third quarter of 2025, Employee Compensation and Benefits hit $192.6 million, a 39% jump year-over-year. Year-to-date for 2025, that expense was $354.4 million, reflecting a 27% increase. In the second quarter of 2025, the expense was $548.6 million for the quarter. The compensation ratio for the year-to-date period stood at 65.8%. That's the kind of compensation package a new player must match immediately to lure away even one successful SMD.

Establishing a global, trusted brand and network of 20 Investment Banking offices takes decades. Evercore Inc. started in 1995, giving it a nearly 30-year head start in building client trust and deal flow experience. New entrants need to replicate this footprint, which is no small feat.

Here's a quick look at the scale required to even approach Evercore Inc.'s established presence as of mid-2025:

Metric Evercore Inc. (Q2 2025) Evercore Inc. (Q1 2025)
Investment Banking Offices Globally 19 18
Investment Banking Senior Managing Directors (SMDs) 159 157
Employees Worldwide ~2,455 ~2,400
Countries with Evercore Offices 13 12

Regulatory compliance and capital requirements create a significant hurdle for new banking platforms. The regulatory framework is designed to keep capital levels high for established players, which acts as a barrier to undercapitalized startups. For large banks, the minimum Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio requirement, effective October 1, 2025, is 4.5 percent. For Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs), there is an additional capital surcharge of at least 1.0 percent. Furthermore, the Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) rule requires a U.S. GSIB to maintain a buffer of at least 2% of its total leverage exposure. To be fair, some recent regulatory shifts might ease burdens for existing large banks; for instance, regulatory staff projected that a final rule could reduce aggregate tier 1 capital requirements for large bank subsidiaries by 28%. Still, the baseline compliance cost is substantial.

Big Tech companies (e.g., Amazon, Google) pose a long-term, disruptive threat via data and AI. These firms command resources that dwarf traditional investment banks. For example, in 2025, Big Tech companies like Microsoft and Meta announced plans to collectively spend hundreds of billions of dollars on AI infrastructure and talent. This focus on AI talent acquisition is already visible in the M&A space; globally, the total value of M&A deals for AI startups rose 288% in 2024 to $49.9 billion, and by mid-2025, that value had already exceeded the full-year 2024 total. Amazon even executed a "reverse" acqui-hire with AI robotics startup Covariant in August 2025.

New entrants must overcome these hurdles:

  • Attract and retain talent commanding compensation packages over $548.6 million quarterly.
  • Build a global footprint matching 19 IB offices across 13 countries.
  • Secure capital to meet minimum CET1 ratios of 4.5% plus surcharges.
  • Compete against Big Tech deploying hundreds of billions of dollars into AI capabilities.

Finance: draft 13-week cash view by Friday.


Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.